| Message ID | 1459987594-5434-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 07/04/16 01:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > The use of subarch should have no current effect on Xen > PV guests, as such this should have no current functional > effects. Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> David
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c index 9b8f1eacc110..40487f1ecb4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_start_kernel(void) boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image = initrd_start; boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_size = xen_start_info->mod_len; boot_params.hdr.cmd_line_ptr = __pa(xen_start_info->cmd_line); + boot_params.hdr.hardware_subarch = X86_SUBARCH_XEN; if (!xen_initial_domain()) { add_preferred_console("xenboot", 0, NULL);
The use of subarch should have no current effect on Xen PV guests, as such this should have no current functional effects. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)