diff mbox

[v2,3/3] xen-blkfront: dynamic configuration of per-vbd resources

Message ID 1469510377-15131-3-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Bob Liu July 26, 2016, 5:19 a.m. UTC
The current VBD layer reserves buffer space for each attached device based on
three statically configured settings which are read at boot time.
 * max_indirect_segs: Maximum amount of segments.
 * max_ring_page_order: Maximum order of pages to be used for the shared ring.
 * max_queues: Maximum of queues(rings) to be used.

But the storage backend, workload, and guest memory result in very different
tuning requirements. It's impossible to centrally predict application
characteristics so it's best to leave allow the settings can be dynamiclly
adjusted based on workload inside the Guest.

Usage:
Show current values:
cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues

Write new values:
echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues

Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
--
v2: Rename to max_ring_page_order and rm the waiting code suggested by Roger.
---
 drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |  275 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 269 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Roger Pau Monné July 26, 2016, 8:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:19:37PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> The current VBD layer reserves buffer space for each attached device based on
> three statically configured settings which are read at boot time.
>  * max_indirect_segs: Maximum amount of segments.
>  * max_ring_page_order: Maximum order of pages to be used for the shared ring.
>  * max_queues: Maximum of queues(rings) to be used.
> 
> But the storage backend, workload, and guest memory result in very different
> tuning requirements. It's impossible to centrally predict application
> characteristics so it's best to leave allow the settings can be dynamiclly
> adjusted based on workload inside the Guest.
> 
> Usage:
> Show current values:
> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
> 
> Write new values:
> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> --
> v2: Rename to max_ring_page_order and rm the waiting code suggested by Roger.
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |  275 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 269 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index 1b4c380..ff5ebe5 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ struct blkfront_info
>  	/* Save uncomplete reqs and bios for migration. */
>  	struct list_head requests;
>  	struct bio_list bio_list;
> +	/* For dynamic configuration. */
> +	unsigned int reconfiguring:1;
> +	int new_max_indirect_segments;

Can't you just use max_indirect_segments? Is it really needed to introduce a 
new struct member?

> +	int max_ring_page_order;
> +	int max_queues;
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned int nr_minors;
> @@ -1350,6 +1355,31 @@ static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_info *info, int suspend)
>  	for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++)
>  		blkif_free_ring(&info->rinfo[i]);
>  
> +	/* Remove old xenstore nodes. */
> +	if (info->nr_ring_pages > 1)
> +		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-page-order");
> +
> +	if (info->nr_rings == 1) {
> +		if (info->nr_ring_pages == 1) {
> +			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-ref");
> +		} else {
> +			for (i = 0; i < info->nr_ring_pages; i++) {
> +				char ring_ref_name[RINGREF_NAME_LEN];
> +
> +				snprintf(ring_ref_name, RINGREF_NAME_LEN, "ring-ref%u", i);
> +				xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, ring_ref_name);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "multi-queue-num-queues");
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++) {
> +			char queuename[QUEUE_NAME_LEN];
> +
> +			snprintf(queuename, QUEUE_NAME_LEN, "queue-%u", i);
> +			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, queuename);
> +		}
> +	}
>  	kfree(info->rinfo);
>  	info->rinfo = NULL;
>  	info->nr_rings = 0;
> @@ -1763,15 +1793,21 @@ static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  	const char *message = NULL;
>  	struct xenbus_transaction xbt;
>  	int err;
> -	unsigned int i, max_page_order = 0;
> +	unsigned int i, backend_max_order = 0;
>  	unsigned int ring_page_order = 0;
>  
>  	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> -			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &max_page_order);
> +			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &backend_max_order);
>  	if (err != 1)
>  		info->nr_ring_pages = 1;
>  	else {
> -		ring_page_order = min(xen_blkif_max_ring_order, max_page_order);
> +		if (info->max_ring_page_order) {
> +			/* Dynamic configured through /sys. */
> +			BUG_ON(info->max_ring_page_order > backend_max_order);

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think you can BUG here. The 
following flow for example will trigger this BUG:

 - Admin sets max_ring_page_order = 2 from sysfs, frontend reconfigures.
 - VM is migrated to a new host without multipage ring support.
 - BUG will trigger on reconnection (because backend_max_order == 1 and 
   max_ring_page_order == 2).

Roger.
Bob Liu July 26, 2016, 8:58 a.m. UTC | #2
On 07/26/2016 04:44 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:19:37PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>> The current VBD layer reserves buffer space for each attached device based on
>> three statically configured settings which are read at boot time.
>>  * max_indirect_segs: Maximum amount of segments.
>>  * max_ring_page_order: Maximum order of pages to be used for the shared ring.
>>  * max_queues: Maximum of queues(rings) to be used.
>>
>> But the storage backend, workload, and guest memory result in very different
>> tuning requirements. It's impossible to centrally predict application
>> characteristics so it's best to leave allow the settings can be dynamiclly
>> adjusted based on workload inside the Guest.
>>
>> Usage:
>> Show current values:
>> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
>> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
>> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
>>
>> Write new values:
>> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
>> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
>> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> --
>> v2: Rename to max_ring_page_order and rm the waiting code suggested by Roger.
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |  275 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 269 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> index 1b4c380..ff5ebe5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ struct blkfront_info
>>  	/* Save uncomplete reqs and bios for migration. */
>>  	struct list_head requests;
>>  	struct bio_list bio_list;
>> +	/* For dynamic configuration. */
>> +	unsigned int reconfiguring:1;
>> +	int new_max_indirect_segments;
> 
> Can't you just use max_indirect_segments? Is it really needed to introduce a 
> new struct member?
> 
>> +	int max_ring_page_order;
>> +	int max_queues;

Do you mean also get rid of these two new struct members?
I'll think about that.

>>  };
>>  
>>  static unsigned int nr_minors;
>> @@ -1350,6 +1355,31 @@ static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_info *info, int suspend)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++)
>>  		blkif_free_ring(&info->rinfo[i]);
>>  
>> +	/* Remove old xenstore nodes. */
>> +	if (info->nr_ring_pages > 1)
>> +		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-page-order");
>> +
>> +	if (info->nr_rings == 1) {
>> +		if (info->nr_ring_pages == 1) {
>> +			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-ref");
>> +		} else {
>> +			for (i = 0; i < info->nr_ring_pages; i++) {
>> +				char ring_ref_name[RINGREF_NAME_LEN];
>> +
>> +				snprintf(ring_ref_name, RINGREF_NAME_LEN, "ring-ref%u", i);
>> +				xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, ring_ref_name);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "multi-queue-num-queues");
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++) {
>> +			char queuename[QUEUE_NAME_LEN];
>> +
>> +			snprintf(queuename, QUEUE_NAME_LEN, "queue-%u", i);
>> +			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, queuename);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  	kfree(info->rinfo);
>>  	info->rinfo = NULL;
>>  	info->nr_rings = 0;
>> @@ -1763,15 +1793,21 @@ static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>>  	const char *message = NULL;
>>  	struct xenbus_transaction xbt;
>>  	int err;
>> -	unsigned int i, max_page_order = 0;
>> +	unsigned int i, backend_max_order = 0;
>>  	unsigned int ring_page_order = 0;
>>  
>>  	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
>> -			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &max_page_order);
>> +			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &backend_max_order);
>>  	if (err != 1)
>>  		info->nr_ring_pages = 1;
>>  	else {
>> -		ring_page_order = min(xen_blkif_max_ring_order, max_page_order);
>> +		if (info->max_ring_page_order) {
>> +			/* Dynamic configured through /sys. */
>> +			BUG_ON(info->max_ring_page_order > backend_max_order);
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think you can BUG here. The 
> following flow for example will trigger this BUG:
> 

You are right, this BUG will be triggered after removed the waiting code in this version.
Will be updated.

>  - Admin sets max_ring_page_order = 2 from sysfs, frontend reconfigures.
>  - VM is migrated to a new host without multipage ring support.
>  - BUG will trigger on reconnection (because backend_max_order == 1 and 
>    max_ring_page_order == 2).
>
Roger Pau Monné July 26, 2016, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:58:10PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> 
> On 07/26/2016 04:44 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:19:37PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> >> The current VBD layer reserves buffer space for each attached device based on
> >> three statically configured settings which are read at boot time.
> >>  * max_indirect_segs: Maximum amount of segments.
> >>  * max_ring_page_order: Maximum order of pages to be used for the shared ring.
> >>  * max_queues: Maximum of queues(rings) to be used.
> >>
> >> But the storage backend, workload, and guest memory result in very different
> >> tuning requirements. It's impossible to centrally predict application
> >> characteristics so it's best to leave allow the settings can be dynamiclly
> >> adjusted based on workload inside the Guest.
> >>
> >> Usage:
> >> Show current values:
> >> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
> >> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
> >> cat /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
> >>
> >> Write new values:
> >> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_indirect_segs
> >> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_ring_page_order
> >> echo <new value> > /sys/devices/vbd-xxx/max_queues
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> >> --
> >> v2: Rename to max_ring_page_order and rm the waiting code suggested by Roger.
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |  275 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 269 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> index 1b4c380..ff5ebe5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ struct blkfront_info
> >>  	/* Save uncomplete reqs and bios for migration. */
> >>  	struct list_head requests;
> >>  	struct bio_list bio_list;
> >> +	/* For dynamic configuration. */
> >> +	unsigned int reconfiguring:1;
> >> +	int new_max_indirect_segments;
> > 
> > Can't you just use max_indirect_segments? Is it really needed to introduce a 
> > new struct member?
> > 
> >> +	int max_ring_page_order;
> >> +	int max_queues;
> 
> Do you mean also get rid of these two new struct members?
> I'll think about that.

Oh no, those two are fine, and AFAICT are needed because now every blkfront 
instance can have it's own max number of queues or ring pages. What I think 
can be removed is the introduction of new_max_indirect_segments, and instead 
just use the already available max_indirect_segments field in that same 
struct.

Roger.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
index 1b4c380..ff5ebe5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
@@ -212,6 +212,11 @@  struct blkfront_info
 	/* Save uncomplete reqs and bios for migration. */
 	struct list_head requests;
 	struct bio_list bio_list;
+	/* For dynamic configuration. */
+	unsigned int reconfiguring:1;
+	int new_max_indirect_segments;
+	int max_ring_page_order;
+	int max_queues;
 };
 
 static unsigned int nr_minors;
@@ -1350,6 +1355,31 @@  static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_info *info, int suspend)
 	for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++)
 		blkif_free_ring(&info->rinfo[i]);
 
+	/* Remove old xenstore nodes. */
+	if (info->nr_ring_pages > 1)
+		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-page-order");
+
+	if (info->nr_rings == 1) {
+		if (info->nr_ring_pages == 1) {
+			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "ring-ref");
+		} else {
+			for (i = 0; i < info->nr_ring_pages; i++) {
+				char ring_ref_name[RINGREF_NAME_LEN];
+
+				snprintf(ring_ref_name, RINGREF_NAME_LEN, "ring-ref%u", i);
+				xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, ring_ref_name);
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
+		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, "multi-queue-num-queues");
+
+		for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++) {
+			char queuename[QUEUE_NAME_LEN];
+
+			snprintf(queuename, QUEUE_NAME_LEN, "queue-%u", i);
+			xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->nodename, queuename);
+		}
+	}
 	kfree(info->rinfo);
 	info->rinfo = NULL;
 	info->nr_rings = 0;
@@ -1763,15 +1793,21 @@  static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
 	const char *message = NULL;
 	struct xenbus_transaction xbt;
 	int err;
-	unsigned int i, max_page_order = 0;
+	unsigned int i, backend_max_order = 0;
 	unsigned int ring_page_order = 0;
 
 	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
-			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &max_page_order);
+			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &backend_max_order);
 	if (err != 1)
 		info->nr_ring_pages = 1;
 	else {
-		ring_page_order = min(xen_blkif_max_ring_order, max_page_order);
+		if (info->max_ring_page_order) {
+			/* Dynamic configured through /sys. */
+			BUG_ON(info->max_ring_page_order > backend_max_order);
+			ring_page_order = info->max_ring_page_order;
+		} else
+			/* Default. */
+			ring_page_order = min(xen_blkif_max_ring_order, backend_max_order);
 		info->nr_ring_pages = 1 << ring_page_order;
 	}
 
@@ -1894,7 +1930,14 @@  static int negotiate_mq(struct blkfront_info *info)
 	if (err < 0)
 		backend_max_queues = 1;
 
-	info->nr_rings = min(backend_max_queues, xen_blkif_max_queues);
+	if (info->max_queues) {
+		/* Dynamic configured through /sys */
+		BUG_ON(info->max_queues > backend_max_queues);
+		info->nr_rings = info->max_queues;
+	} else
+		/* Default. */
+		info->nr_rings = min(backend_max_queues, xen_blkif_max_queues);
+
 	/* We need at least one ring. */
 	if (!info->nr_rings)
 		info->nr_rings = 1;
@@ -2352,11 +2395,197 @@  static void blkfront_gather_backend_features(struct blkfront_info *info)
 			    NULL);
 	if (err)
 		info->max_indirect_segments = 0;
-	else
+	else {
 		info->max_indirect_segments = min(indirect_segments,
 						  xen_blkif_max_segments);
+		if (info->new_max_indirect_segments) {
+			BUG_ON(info->new_max_indirect_segments > indirect_segments);
+			info->max_indirect_segments = info->new_max_indirect_segments;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static ssize_t max_ring_page_order_show(struct device *dev,
+					struct device_attribute *attr, char *page)
+{
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(page, "%u\n", get_order(info->nr_ring_pages * XEN_PAGE_SIZE));
 }
 
+static ssize_t max_indirect_segs_show(struct device *dev,
+				      struct device_attribute *attr, char *page)
+{
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(page, "%u\n", info->max_indirect_segments);
+}
+
+static ssize_t max_queues_show(struct device *dev,
+			       struct device_attribute *attr, char *page)
+{
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(page, "%u\n", info->nr_rings);
+}
+
+static ssize_t dynamic_reconfig_device(struct blkfront_info *info, ssize_t count)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Prevent new requests even to software request queue.
+	 */
+	blk_mq_freeze_queue(info->rq);
+
+	/*
+	 * Guarantee no uncompleted reqs.
+	 */
+	if (part_in_flight(&info->gd->part0) || info->reconfiguring) {
+		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(info->rq);
+		pr_err("Dev:%s busy, please retry later.\n", dev_name(&info->xbdev->dev));
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Frontend: 				Backend:
+	 * Freeze_queue()
+	 * Switch to XenbusStateClosed
+	 *					frontend_changed(StateClosed)
+	 *						> xen_blkif_disconnect()
+	 *						> Switch to XenbusStateClosed
+	 * blkback_changed(StateClosed)
+	 *	> blkfront_resume()
+	 *	> Switch to StateInitialised
+	 *					frontend_changed(StateInitialised):
+	 *						> reconnect
+	 *						> Switch to StateConnected
+	 * blkback_changed(StateConnected)
+	 *	> blkif_recover()
+	 *		> Also switch to StateConnected
+	 *		> Unfreeze_queue()
+	 */
+	info->reconfiguring = true;
+	xenbus_switch_state(info->xbdev, XenbusStateClosed);
+
+	return count;
+}
+
+static ssize_t max_indirect_segs_store(struct device *dev,
+		struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	ssize_t ret;
+	unsigned int max_segs = 0, backend_max_segs = 0;
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err;
+
+	ret = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &max_segs);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (max_segs == info->max_indirect_segments)
+		return count;
+
+	err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
+			    "feature-max-indirect-segments", "%u", &backend_max_segs,
+			    NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("Backend %s doesn't support feature-indirect-segments.\n",
+			info->xbdev->otherend);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (max_segs > backend_max_segs) {
+		pr_err("Invalid max indirect segment (%u), backend-max: %u.\n",
+			max_segs, backend_max_segs);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	info->new_max_indirect_segments = max_segs;
+
+	return dynamic_reconfig_device(info, count);
+}
+
+static ssize_t max_ring_page_order_store(struct device *dev,
+				 struct device_attribute *attr,
+				 const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	ssize_t ret;
+	unsigned int max_order = 0, backend_max_order = 0;
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err;
+
+	ret = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &max_order);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if ((1 << max_order) == info->nr_ring_pages)
+		return count;
+
+	if (max_order > XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER) {
+		pr_err("Invalid max_ring_page_order (%u), max: %u.\n",
+				max_order, XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
+			   "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &backend_max_order);
+	if (err != 1) {
+		pr_err("Backend %s doesn't support feature multi-page-ring.\n",
+			info->xbdev->otherend);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	if (max_order > backend_max_order) {
+		pr_err("Invalid max_ring_page_order (%u), backend supports max: %u.\n",
+			max_order, backend_max_order);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	info->max_ring_page_order = max_order;
+
+	return dynamic_reconfig_device(info, count);
+}
+
+static ssize_t max_queues_store(struct device *dev,
+				struct device_attribute *attr,
+				const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	ssize_t ret;
+	unsigned int max_queues = 0, backend_max_queues = 0;
+	struct blkfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err;
+
+	ret = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &max_queues);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (max_queues == info->nr_rings)
+		return count;
+
+	if (max_queues > num_online_cpus()) {
+		pr_err("Invalid max_queues (%u), can't bigger than online cpus: %u.\n",
+			max_queues, num_online_cpus());
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
+			   "multi-queue-max-queues", "%u", &backend_max_queues);
+	if (err != 1) {
+		pr_err("Backend %s doesn't support block multi queue.\n",
+			info->xbdev->otherend);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	if (max_queues > backend_max_queues) {
+		pr_err("Invalid max_queues (%u), backend supports max: %u.\n",
+			max_queues, backend_max_queues);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	info->max_queues = max_queues;
+
+	return dynamic_reconfig_device(info, count);
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_queues);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_ring_page_order);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_indirect_segs);
+
 /*
  * Invoked when the backend is finally 'ready' (and has told produced
  * the details about the physical device - #sectors, size, etc).
@@ -2393,6 +2622,10 @@  static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
 		 * supports indirect descriptors, and how many.
 		 */
 		blkif_recover(info);
+		if (info->reconfiguring) {
+			blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(info->rq);
+			info->reconfiguring = false;
+		}
 		return;
 
 	default:
@@ -2443,6 +2676,22 @@  static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
+	if (err)
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_indirect_segs);
+	if (err) {
+		device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_queues);
+	if (err) {
+		device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
+		device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_indirect_segs);
+		goto fail;
+	}
 	xenbus_switch_state(info->xbdev, XenbusStateConnected);
 
 	/* Kick pending requests. */
@@ -2453,6 +2702,12 @@  static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
 	add_disk(info->gd);
 
 	info->is_ready = 1;
+	return;
+
+fail:
+	blkif_free(info, 0);
+	xlvbd_release_gendisk(info);
+	return;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2500,8 +2755,16 @@  static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
 		break;
 
 	case XenbusStateClosed:
-		if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
+		if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) {
+			if (info->reconfiguring)
+				if (blkfront_resume(info->xbdev)) {
+					/* Resume failed. */
+					info->reconfiguring = false;
+					xenbus_switch_state(info->xbdev, XenbusStateClosed);
+					pr_err("Resume from dynamic configuration failed\n");
+				}
 			break;
+		}
 		/* Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough */
 	case XenbusStateClosing:
 		if (info)