Message ID | 1484157461-12185-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
>>> On 11.01.17 at 18:57, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c > @@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ long arch_do_sysctl( > > /* Bad featureset index? */ > if ( !p ) > + { > ret = -EINVAL; > + break; > + } > > cpuid_policy_to_featureset(p, featureset); Considering how the following code is written, adding an "else" would seem more natural. With the patch above the !ret check right out of context would then be dead code. With either of the possible adjustments Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Jan
On 12/01/17 10:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 11.01.17 at 18:57, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c >> @@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ long arch_do_sysctl( >> >> /* Bad featureset index? */ >> if ( !p ) >> + { >> ret = -EINVAL; >> + break; >> + } >> >> cpuid_policy_to_featureset(p, featureset); > Considering how the following code is written, adding an "else" > would seem more natural. With the patch above the !ret check > right out of context would then be dead code. With either of > the possible adjustments > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Good point - I will make that adjustment. ~Andrew
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c index 87da541..274ca0c 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c @@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ long arch_do_sysctl( /* Bad featureset index? */ if ( !p ) + { ret = -EINVAL; + break; + } cpuid_policy_to_featureset(p, featureset);
This was introduced by c/s c38869e711 "x86/cpuid: Drop the temporary linear feature bitmap from struct cpuid_policy", and caught by Coverity. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> --- CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> --- xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)