From patchwork Wed Mar 27 17:32:06 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paul Durrant X-Patchwork-Id: 10873821 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E331922 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5B28536 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0515928683; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:34:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A30428536 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h9CPO-00049V-In; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:32:14 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-dfw2.inumbo.com ([104.130.134.6]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h9CPN-00049O-El for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:32:13 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 4099ea75-50b6-11e9-bc90-bc764e045a96 Received: from SMTP03.CITRIX.COM (unknown [162.221.156.55]) by us1-rack-dfw2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4099ea75-50b6-11e9-bc90-bc764e045a96; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:32:11 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,277,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="81999313" From: Paul Durrant To: , , Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:32:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20190327173206.9065-3-paul.durrant@citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1.2.gb21ebb6 In-Reply-To: <20190327173206.9065-1-paul.durrant@citrix.com> References: <20190327173206.9065-1-paul.durrant@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-block: always report 'sectors' in terms of 512-byte units X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Anthony Perard , Kevin Wolf , Paul Durrant , Stefano Stabellini , Max Reitz Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The mail thread at [1] clarifies that the Xen blkif protocol requires that 'sectors' value reported in xenstore is strictly in terms of 512-byte units and is not dependent on the logical sector size reported in 'sector-size'. [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-03/msg01600.html Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant --- Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Anthony Perard Cc: Kevin Wolf Cc: Max Reitz --- hw/block/xen-block.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/block/xen-block.c b/hw/block/xen-block.c index a848849f48..57e9da7e1c 100644 --- a/hw/block/xen-block.c +++ b/hw/block/xen-block.c @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void xen_block_set_size(XenBlockDevice *blockdev) const char *type = object_get_typename(OBJECT(blockdev)); XenBlockVdev *vdev = &blockdev->props.vdev; BlockConf *conf = &blockdev->props.conf; - int64_t sectors = blk_getlength(conf->blk) / conf->logical_block_size; + int64_t sectors = blk_getlength(conf->blk) / XEN_BLKIF_SECTOR_SIZE; XenDevice *xendev = XEN_DEVICE(blockdev); trace_xen_block_size(type, vdev->disk, vdev->partition, sectors);