diff mbox series

[26/37] xen/arm: build NUMA cpu_to_node map in dt_smp_init_cpus

Message ID 20210923120236.3692135-27-wei.chen@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add device tree based NUMA support to Arm | expand

Commit Message

Wei Chen Sept. 23, 2021, 12:02 p.m. UTC
NUMA implementation has a cpu_to_node array to store CPU to NODE
map. Xen is using CPU logical ID in runtime components, so we
use CPU logical ID as CPU index in cpu_to_node.

In device tree case, cpu_logical_map is created in dt_smp_init_cpus.
So, when NUMA is enabled, dt_smp_init_cpus will fetch CPU NUMA id
at the same time for cpu_to_node.

Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
---
 xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c     | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Stefano Stabellini Sept. 24, 2021, 2:26 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Wei Chen wrote:
> NUMA implementation has a cpu_to_node array to store CPU to NODE
> map. Xen is using CPU logical ID in runtime components, so we
> use CPU logical ID as CPU index in cpu_to_node.
> 
> In device tree case, cpu_logical_map is created in dt_smp_init_cpus.
> So, when NUMA is enabled, dt_smp_init_cpus will fetch CPU NUMA id
> at the same time for cpu_to_node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c     | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> index 60c0e82fc5..6e3cc8d3cc 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,12 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
>      {
>          [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = MPIDR_INVALID
>      };
> +    static nodeid_t node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata =
> +    {
> +        [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
> +    };
>      bool bootcpu_valid = false;
> +    uint32_t nid = 0;
>      int rc;
>  
>      mpidr = system_cpuinfo.mpidr.bits & MPIDR_HWID_MASK;
> @@ -172,6 +177,28 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
>              continue;
>          }
>  
> +        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) )
> +        {
> +            /*
> +             * When CONFIG_NUMA is set, try to fetch numa infomation
> +             * from CPU dts node, otherwise the nid is always 0.
> +             */
> +            if ( !dt_property_read_u32(cpu, "numa-node-id", &nid) )
> +            {
> +                printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> +                       "cpu[%d] dts path: %s: doesn't have numa information!\n",
                               ^ %u


> +                       cpuidx, dt_node_full_name(cpu));

I think that this message shouldn't be a warning: CONFIG_NUMA is a
compile time option. Anybody that enables CONFIG_NUMA in the Xen build
will get this warning printed out at boot time if Xen is booting on a
regular non-NUMA machine, right?

The warning should only be printed if NUMA is actively enabled, e.g.
there is a distance-map but the cpus don't have numa-node-id.



> +                /*
> +                 * During the early stage of NUMA initialization, when Xen
> +                 * found any CPU dts node doesn't have numa-node-id info, the
> +                 * NUMA will be treated as off, all CPU will be set to a FAKE
> +                 * node 0. So if we get numa-node-id failed here, we should
> +                 * set nid to 0.
> +                 */
> +                nid = 0;
> +            }
> +        }
> +
>          /*
>           * 8 MSBs must be set to 0 in the DT since the reg property
>           * defines the MPIDR[23:0]
> @@ -231,9 +258,12 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
>          {
>              printk("cpu%d init failed (hwid %"PRIregister"): %d\n", i, hwid, rc);
>              tmp_map[i] = MPIDR_INVALID;
> +            node_map[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>          }
> -        else
> +        else {
>              tmp_map[i] = hwid;
> +            node_map[i] = nid;
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      if ( !bootcpu_valid )
> @@ -249,6 +279,11 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
>              continue;
>          cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_possible_map);
>          cpu_logical_map(i) = tmp_map[i];
> +
> +        nid = node_map[i];
> +        if ( nid >= MAX_NUMNODES )
> +            nid = 0;
> +        numa_set_node(i, nid);
>      }
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> index 758eafeb05..8a4ad379e0 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ extern mfn_t first_valid_mfn;
>  #define node_start_pfn(nid) (mfn_x(first_valid_mfn))
>  #define __node_distance(a, b) (20)
>  
> +static inline void numa_set_node(int cpu, nodeid_t node)
> +{
> +
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  static inline unsigned int arch_have_default_dmazone(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
Wei Chen Sept. 24, 2021, 4:25 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Stefano,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2021年9月24日 10:26
> To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; sstabellini@kernel.org; julien@xen.org;
> Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/37] xen/arm: build NUMA cpu_to_node map in
> dt_smp_init_cpus
> 
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Wei Chen wrote:
> > NUMA implementation has a cpu_to_node array to store CPU to NODE
> > map. Xen is using CPU logical ID in runtime components, so we
> > use CPU logical ID as CPU index in cpu_to_node.
> >
> > In device tree case, cpu_logical_map is created in dt_smp_init_cpus.
> > So, when NUMA is enabled, dt_smp_init_cpus will fetch CPU NUMA id
> > at the same time for cpu_to_node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c     | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h |  5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> > index 60c0e82fc5..6e3cc8d3cc 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> > @@ -121,7 +121,12 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
> >      {
> >          [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = MPIDR_INVALID
> >      };
> > +    static nodeid_t node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata =
> > +    {
> > +        [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
> > +    };
> >      bool bootcpu_valid = false;
> > +    uint32_t nid = 0;
> >      int rc;
> >
> >      mpidr = system_cpuinfo.mpidr.bits & MPIDR_HWID_MASK;
> > @@ -172,6 +177,28 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
> >              continue;
> >          }
> >
> > +        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) )
> > +        {
> > +            /*
> > +             * When CONFIG_NUMA is set, try to fetch numa infomation
> > +             * from CPU dts node, otherwise the nid is always 0.
> > +             */
> > +            if ( !dt_property_read_u32(cpu, "numa-node-id", &nid) )
> > +            {
> > +                printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> > +                       "cpu[%d] dts path: %s: doesn't have numa
> information!\n",
>                                ^ %u
> 
> 
> > +                       cpuidx, dt_node_full_name(cpu));
> 
> I think that this message shouldn't be a warning: CONFIG_NUMA is a
> compile time option. Anybody that enables CONFIG_NUMA in the Xen build
> will get this warning printed out at boot time if Xen is booting on a
> regular non-NUMA machine, right?
> 
> The warning should only be printed if NUMA is actively enabled, e.g.
> there is a distance-map but the cpus don't have numa-node-id.
> 
> 

Yes, this message would be unexpected on a regular non-NUMA machine.
I will some check condition to print this message.

> 
> > +                /*
> > +                 * During the early stage of NUMA initialization, when
> Xen
> > +                 * found any CPU dts node doesn't have numa-node-id
> info, the
> > +                 * NUMA will be treated as off, all CPU will be set to
> a FAKE
> > +                 * node 0. So if we get numa-node-id failed here, we
> should
> > +                 * set nid to 0.
> > +                 */
> > +                nid = 0;
> > +            }
> > +        }
> > +
> >          /*
> >           * 8 MSBs must be set to 0 in the DT since the reg property
> >           * defines the MPIDR[23:0]
> > @@ -231,9 +258,12 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
> >          {
> >              printk("cpu%d init failed (hwid %"PRIregister"): %d\n", i,
> hwid, rc);
> >              tmp_map[i] = MPIDR_INVALID;
> > +            node_map[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >          }
> > -        else
> > +        else {
> >              tmp_map[i] = hwid;
> > +            node_map[i] = nid;
> > +        }
> >      }
> >
> >      if ( !bootcpu_valid )
> > @@ -249,6 +279,11 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
> >              continue;
> >          cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_possible_map);
> >          cpu_logical_map(i) = tmp_map[i];
> > +
> > +        nid = node_map[i];
> > +        if ( nid >= MAX_NUMNODES )
> > +            nid = 0;
> > +        numa_set_node(i, nid);
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > index 758eafeb05..8a4ad379e0 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ extern mfn_t first_valid_mfn;
> >  #define node_start_pfn(nid) (mfn_x(first_valid_mfn))
> >  #define __node_distance(a, b) (20)
> >
> > +static inline void numa_set_node(int cpu, nodeid_t node)
> > +{
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> >  #endif
> >
> >  static inline unsigned int arch_have_default_dmazone(void)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
index 60c0e82fc5..6e3cc8d3cc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
@@ -121,7 +121,12 @@  static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
     {
         [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = MPIDR_INVALID
     };
+    static nodeid_t node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata =
+    {
+        [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
+    };
     bool bootcpu_valid = false;
+    uint32_t nid = 0;
     int rc;
 
     mpidr = system_cpuinfo.mpidr.bits & MPIDR_HWID_MASK;
@@ -172,6 +177,28 @@  static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
             continue;
         }
 
+        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) )
+        {
+            /*
+             * When CONFIG_NUMA is set, try to fetch numa infomation
+             * from CPU dts node, otherwise the nid is always 0.
+             */
+            if ( !dt_property_read_u32(cpu, "numa-node-id", &nid) )
+            {
+                printk(XENLOG_WARNING
+                       "cpu[%d] dts path: %s: doesn't have numa information!\n",
+                       cpuidx, dt_node_full_name(cpu));
+                /*
+                 * During the early stage of NUMA initialization, when Xen
+                 * found any CPU dts node doesn't have numa-node-id info, the
+                 * NUMA will be treated as off, all CPU will be set to a FAKE
+                 * node 0. So if we get numa-node-id failed here, we should
+                 * set nid to 0.
+                 */
+                nid = 0;
+            }
+        }
+
         /*
          * 8 MSBs must be set to 0 in the DT since the reg property
          * defines the MPIDR[23:0]
@@ -231,9 +258,12 @@  static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
         {
             printk("cpu%d init failed (hwid %"PRIregister"): %d\n", i, hwid, rc);
             tmp_map[i] = MPIDR_INVALID;
+            node_map[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
         }
-        else
+        else {
             tmp_map[i] = hwid;
+            node_map[i] = nid;
+        }
     }
 
     if ( !bootcpu_valid )
@@ -249,6 +279,11 @@  static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
             continue;
         cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_possible_map);
         cpu_logical_map(i) = tmp_map[i];
+
+        nid = node_map[i];
+        if ( nid >= MAX_NUMNODES )
+            nid = 0;
+        numa_set_node(i, nid);
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
index 758eafeb05..8a4ad379e0 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@  extern mfn_t first_valid_mfn;
 #define node_start_pfn(nid) (mfn_x(first_valid_mfn))
 #define __node_distance(a, b) (20)
 
+static inline void numa_set_node(int cpu, nodeid_t node)
+{
+
+}
+
 #endif
 
 static inline unsigned int arch_have_default_dmazone(void)