Message ID | 20240529050507.1392041-7-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | d15b9bd42cd3b2077812d4bf32f532a9bd5c4914 |
Headers | show |
Series | [01/12] ubd: untagle discard vs write zeroes not support handling | expand |
On 5/29/24 14:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Fall through to the main call to blk_queue_max_discard_sectors given that > max_blocks has been initialized to zero above instead of duplicating the > call. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
On 5/28/24 22:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Fall through to the main call to blk_queue_max_discard_sectors given that > max_blocks has been initialized to zero above instead of duplicating the > call. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index 09ffe9d826aeac..437743e3a0d37d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -844,8 +844,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned int mode) case SD_LBP_FULL: case SD_LBP_DISABLE: - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0); - return; + break; case SD_LBP_UNMAP: max_blocks = min_not_zero(sdkp->max_unmap_blocks,
Fall through to the main call to blk_queue_max_discard_sectors given that max_blocks has been initialized to zero above instead of duplicating the call. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- drivers/scsi/sd.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)