From patchwork Fri Oct 25 10:06:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13850426 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A4CD0C5F8 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.825856.1240293 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HFg-0005FY-Qx; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:09:04 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 825856.1240293; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:09:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HFg-0005Bv-DM; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:09:04 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 825856; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:09:02 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HFe-00014t-Fx for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:09:02 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 26ba9bc5-92b9-11ef-a0bf-8be0dac302b0; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:09:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XZdmK4NFSz1ynJN; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:09:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemg200008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.35]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3CE1180043; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:08:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemg200008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:08:56 +0800 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 26ba9bc5-92b9-11ef-a0bf-8be0dac302b0 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH -next v4 18/19] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() into separate enter and exit functions Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:06:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20241025100700.3714552-19-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241025100700.3714552-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20241025100700.3714552-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemg200008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.35) Split report_syscall() to two separate enter and exit functions. So it will be more clear when arm64 switch to generic entry. No functional changes. Suggested-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c index 6c1dcfe6d25a..6ea303ab9e22 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -2290,7 +2290,7 @@ enum ptrace_syscall_dir { PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT, }; -static void report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir) +static void report_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { int regno; unsigned long saved_reg; @@ -2313,13 +2313,24 @@ static void report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir) */ regno = (is_compat_task() ? 12 : 7); saved_reg = regs->regs[regno]; - regs->regs[regno] = dir; + regs->regs[regno] = PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER; - if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER) { - if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs)) - forget_syscall(regs); - regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; - } else if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) { + if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs)) + forget_syscall(regs); + regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; +} + +static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int regno; + unsigned long saved_reg; + + /* See comment for report_syscall_enter() */ + regno = (is_compat_task() ? 12 : 7); + saved_reg = regs->regs[regno]; + regs->regs[regno] = PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT; + + if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) { ptrace_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0); regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; } else { @@ -2339,7 +2350,7 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags(); if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { - report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER); + report_syscall_enter(regs); if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) return NO_SYSCALL; } @@ -2367,7 +2378,7 @@ void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) trace_sys_exit(regs, syscall_get_return_value(current, regs)); if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SINGLESTEP)) - report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT); + report_syscall_exit(regs); rseq_syscall(regs); }