@@ -294,14 +294,6 @@ static inline bool arm64_preempt_schedule_irq(void)
if (!need_irq_preemption())
return false;
- /*
- * Note: thread_info::preempt_count includes both thread_info::count
- * and thread_info::need_resched, and is not equivalent to
- * preempt_count().
- */
- if (READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count) != 0)
- return false;
-
/*
* DAIF.DA are cleared at the start of IRQ/FIQ handling, and when GIC
* priority masking is used the GIC irqchip driver will clear DAIF.IF
@@ -593,8 +585,10 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
irq_exit_rcu();
- if (arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
- preempt_schedule_irq();
+ if (!preempt_count() && need_resched()) {
+ if (arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
+ preempt_schedule_irq();
+ }
exit_to_kernel_mode(regs, state);
}
The generic entry code uses preempt_count() and need_resched() helpers to check if it should do preempt_schedule_irq(). Currently, arm64 use its own check logic, that is "READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count == 0", which is equivalent to "preempt_count() == 0 && need_resched()". In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, use these helpers to replace arm64's own code and move it ahead. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> --- v6: - Update the commit message. - Move this ahead before we change the preemption logic to preempt non-IRQ exceptions. --- arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)