diff mbox series

[v1] CHANGELOG.md: Mention PCI passthrough for HVM domUs

Message ID 20250312040220.2624329-1-Jiqian.Chen@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v1] CHANGELOG.md: Mention PCI passthrough for HVM domUs | expand

Commit Message

Jiqian Chen March 12, 2025, 4:02 a.m. UTC
PCI passthrough is already supported for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH
on x86. The last related patch on Qemu side was merged after Xen4.20
release. So mention this feature in Xen4.21 entry.

Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
---
 CHANGELOG.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Jan Beulich March 12, 2025, 8:51 a.m. UTC | #1
On 12.03.2025 05:02, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> PCI passthrough is already supported for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH
> on x86. The last related patch on Qemu side was merged after Xen4.20
> release. So mention this feature in Xen4.21 entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> ---
>  CHANGELOG.md | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
> index 7201c484f899..b6de9b72ea7a 100644
> --- a/CHANGELOG.md
> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
>   - On x86:
>     - Option to attempt to fixup p2m page-faults on PVH dom0.
>     - Resizable BARs is supported for PVH dom0.
> +   - Support PCI passthrough for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH.

Aren't we still in need of SR-IOV support in order to make such an
unconditional statement?

Jan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 7201c484f899..b6de9b72ea7a 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@  The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
  - On x86:
    - Option to attempt to fixup p2m page-faults on PVH dom0.
    - Resizable BARs is supported for PVH dom0.
+   - Support PCI passthrough for HVM domUs when dom0 is PVH.
 
 ### Removed