From patchwork Thu Apr 8 12:17:58 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jan Beulich X-Patchwork-Id: 12190885 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9019DC433ED for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E99561041 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:18:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E99561041 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.107237.204989 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUTbl-0003Zz-IA; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:18:01 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 107237.204989; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:18:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUTbl-0003Zs-EL; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:18:01 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 107237; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:17:59 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUTbj-0003ZO-T4 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:17:59 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 90761739-f7d3-4dd4-80d1-076cba7ebca2; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF1FB090; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:17:58 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 90761739-f7d3-4dd4-80d1-076cba7ebca2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1617884278; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QnmG9k8Zw1WTHYZkvL1RP6b1ZHGImCYwyft4ku4C/6U=; b=jARlKgxxgKd+LvB/iXqHR4JKLtrBD7/3V9FIdXlHV+vniPp/MLLCibRxuHF+WQxNFcZbdp SzojpNL3PZBmLmiHV7drDOaPWnEAJXsTNHahdvT7+/kC2vPdpEym1XinF+WcujsqSjmbSl 5s1M7h/eHRv274C0zjtxNc5RT3sLpM8= Subject: [PATCH 03/11] x86/MCE: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array() From: Jan Beulich To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Cc: Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Wei Liu , =?utf-8?q?R?= =?utf-8?q?oger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= References: Message-ID: <47101cea-a856-3921-dd19-89ce766aaaeb@suse.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:17:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US There is a difference in generated code: xmalloc_bytes() forces SMP_CACHE_BYTES alignment. I think we not only don't need this here, but actually don't want it. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mctelem.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mctelem.c @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ void __init mctelem_init(unsigned int da if ((mctctl.mctc_elems = xmalloc_array(struct mctelem_ent, MC_NENT)) == NULL || - (datarr = xmalloc_bytes(MC_NENT * datasz)) == NULL) { + (datarr = xmalloc_array(char, MC_NENT * datasz)) == NULL) { xfree(mctctl.mctc_elems); printk("Allocations for MCA telemetry failed\n"); return;