| Message ID | 4d0a8aba3ec17fa428f8d18f0008f863481b1f67.1707146506.git.oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enable build of full Xen for RISC-V | expand |
On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 16:13 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Thanks for Ack. ~ Oleksii
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b1ea91b1eb --- /dev/null +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_SMP_H +#define __ASM_RISCV_SMP_H + +#include <xen/cpumask.h> +#include <xen/percpu.h> + +DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_mask); +DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_mask); + +/* + * Do we, for platform reasons, need to actually keep CPUs online when we + * would otherwise prefer them to be off? + */ +#define park_offline_cpus false + +#endif + +/* + * Local variables: + * mode: C + * c-file-style: "BSD" + * c-basic-offset: 4 + * indent-tabs-mode: nil + * End: + */
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> --- Changes in V4: - update the V3 changes ( remove that cpu_is_offline() was droped and instead of message used subject ) - drop cpu_is_offline() as it was moved to xen/smp.h. --- Changes in V3: - add SPDX. - drop unnessary #ifdef. - fix "No new line" - update the commit subject --- Changes in V2: - Nothing changed. Only rebase. --- xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h