Message ID | 594A598B0200007800165056@prv-mh.provo.novell.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 21/06/17 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote: > Both the XSA-217 fix and > lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-04/msg02945.html > make this assumption, so let's enforce it. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper@citrix.com>, although... > > --- a/xen/common/domctl.c > +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c > @@ -1071,7 +1071,9 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xe > break; > } > > - ret = xsm_set_target(XSM_HOOK, d, e); > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + if ( is_hvm_domain(e) ) > + ret = xsm_set_target(XSM_HOOK, d, e); > if ( ret ) { ... do you mind fixing this style while you are here? ~Andrew > put_domain(e); > break; > > >
--- a/xen/common/domctl.c +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c @@ -1071,7 +1071,9 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xe break; } - ret = xsm_set_target(XSM_HOOK, d, e); + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; + if ( is_hvm_domain(e) ) + ret = xsm_set_target(XSM_HOOK, d, e); if ( ret ) { put_domain(e); break;