Message ID | 5CDE91F802000078002300B1@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | x86: IRQ management adjustments | expand |
On 17/05/2019 11:50, Jan Beulich wrote: > The subsequent cpumask_intersects() covers the "empty" case quite fine. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c @@ -650,9 +650,6 @@ void move_masked_irq(struct irq_desc *de desc->status &= ~IRQ_MOVE_PENDING; - if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(pending_mask))) - return; - if (!desc->handler->set_affinity) return;