@@ -482,9 +482,8 @@ safe."
-config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(/BUG\\(\\);/))))"}
-doc_end
--doc_begin="Switch clauses not ending with the break statement are safe if an
-explicit comment indicating the fallthrough intention is present."
--config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\* [fF]all ?through.? \\*/.*$,0..1))))"}
+-doc_begin="Switch clauses ending with an explicit comment indicating the fallthrough intention are safe."
+-config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\* [fF]all ?through\\.? \\*/.*$,0..2))))"}
-doc_end
-doc_begin="Switch statements having a controlling expression of enum type deliberately do not have a default case: gcc -Wall enables -Wswitch which warns (and breaks the build as we use -Werror) if one of the enum labels is missing from the switch."
Add missing escape for the final dot of the fallthrough comment, extend the search of a fallthrough comment up to 2 lines after the last statement and improve the text of the justification. Fixes: a128d8da91 ("automation/eclair: add deviations for MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3") Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> --- automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)