From patchwork Fri Apr 23 10:53:24 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jan Beulich X-Patchwork-Id: 12220097 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1243DC43460 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F1261462 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A8F1261462 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.116149.221736 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZtR9-0003xz-GI; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:27 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 116149.221736; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZtR9-0003xs-Cs; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:27 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 116149; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:26 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZtR8-0003xd-0P for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:26 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 8e0f1d37-1d03-4cf3-acfd-84135c3bb88f; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF4DB05D; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:53:24 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 8e0f1d37-1d03-4cf3-acfd-84135c3bb88f X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1619175204; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oo1/XTyys+4AMwPBg+4apC2PyGiHm7JIfunlGllfB28=; b=SwpxV/hzcMlbMTpBYIWcnUMWSkoATeEy4BcOU4v1PPN4SDWPyT4+1c2ljejP5bqJZLXtJN M4DyyXXDJ5VAqV0U9bHLO6V/1Cm391oLlXydDfUGNvNT1yZ3LBMCsR72QYzdme9a2tRgyY IusHiwVWVlWEgNyWpZpOb/DDzIElLx4= Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/shadow: re-use variables in shadow_get_page_from_l1e() From: Jan Beulich To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Cc: Andrew Cooper , Wei Liu , =?utf-8?q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= , George Dunlap , Tim Deegan References: <4731a3a3-906a-98ac-11ba-6a0723903391@suse.com> <3e7ad009-f062-d58a-9380-103ce1573a73@suse.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:53:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e7ad009-f062-d58a-9380-103ce1573a73@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US There's little point in doing multiple mfn_to_page() or page_get_owner() on all the same MFN. Calculate them once at the start of the function. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Tim Deegan --- v5: Integrate into series. Re-base. v2: Re-base. --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/set.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/set.c @@ -88,19 +88,25 @@ static int inline shadow_get_page_from_l1e(shadow_l1e_t sl1e, struct domain *d, p2m_type_t type) { int res; - mfn_t mfn; - struct domain *owner; + mfn_t mfn = shadow_l1e_get_mfn(sl1e); + const struct page_info *pg = NULL; + struct domain *owner = NULL; ASSERT(!sh_l1e_is_magic(sl1e)); ASSERT(shadow_mode_refcounts(d)); + if ( mfn_valid(mfn) ) + { + pg = mfn_to_page(mfn); + owner = page_get_owner(pg); + } + /* * Check whether refcounting is suppressed on this page. For example, * VMX'es APIC access MFN is just a surrogate page. It doesn't actually * get accessed, and hence there's no need to refcount it. */ - mfn = shadow_l1e_get_mfn(sl1e); - if ( mfn_valid(mfn) && page_refcounting_suppressed(mfn_to_page(mfn)) ) + if ( pg && page_refcounting_suppressed(pg) ) return 0; res = get_page_from_l1e(sl1e, d, d); @@ -111,9 +117,7 @@ shadow_get_page_from_l1e(shadow_l1e_t sl */ if ( unlikely(res < 0) && !shadow_mode_translate(d) && - mfn_valid(mfn = shadow_l1e_get_mfn(sl1e)) && - (owner = page_get_owner(mfn_to_page(mfn))) && - (d != owner) ) + owner && (d != owner) ) { res = xsm_priv_mapping(XSM_TARGET, d, owner); if ( !res ) @@ -136,9 +140,8 @@ shadow_get_page_from_l1e(shadow_l1e_t sl * already have checked that we're supposed to have access, so * we can just grab a reference directly. */ - mfn = shadow_l1e_get_mfn(sl1e); - if ( mfn_valid(mfn) ) - res = get_page_from_l1e(sl1e, d, page_get_owner(mfn_to_page(mfn))); + if ( owner ) + res = get_page_from_l1e(sl1e, d, owner); } if ( unlikely(res < 0) )