[v4,0/8] xfs: miscellaneous optimisations

Message ID	20210317045706.651306-1-david@fromorbit.com (mailing list archive)
Headers	show Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@kernel.org> From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 0/8] xfs: miscellaneous optimisations Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:56:58 +1100 Message-Id: <20210317045706.651306-1-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk
Series	xfs: miscellaneous optimisations \| expand [v4,0/8] xfs: miscellaneous optimisations [1/8] xfs: initialise attr fork on inode create [2/8] xfs: reduce buffer log item shadow allocations [3/8] xfs: xfs_buf_item_size_segment() needs to pass segment offset [4/8] xfs: optimise xfs_buf_item_size/format for contiguous regions [5/8] xfs: type verification is expensive [6/8] xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check [7/8] xfs: reduce debug overhead of dir leaf/node checks [8/8] xfs: __percpu_counter_compare() inode count debug too expensive

Message ID

20210317045706.651306-1-david@fromorbit.com (mailing list archive)

Headers

From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/8] xfs: miscellaneous optimisations
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:56:58 +1100
Message-Id: <20210317045706.651306-1-david@fromorbit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Series

xfs: miscellaneous optimisations | expand

Message

Dave Chinner March 17, 2021, 4:56 a.m. UTC

Hi folks,

These patches have been separated out of my big log patchset as
standalone optimisations and fixes (hence the "v4" version) that
was posted here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20210305051143.182133-1-david@fromorbit.com/T/#m2eceb42c20de51dccbf7d34a1e84f581d1c801cf

These are the changes that are easy to untangle from that patchset
to make it smaller and more manageable. All of the patches are
unchanged since they were last posted for review (except for rebase
noise). They pass fstests cleanly, and this posting is based on
5.12-rc3 + xfs for-next branch.

Cheers,

Dave.