[V3,0/4] Large extent counters tests

Message

Chandan Babu R June 11, 2022, 11:10 a.m. UTC

Hi all,

This patchset adds two tests for verifying the behaviour of Large
extent counters feature. It also fixes xfs/270 test failure when
executed on a filesystem with Large extent counters enabled.

Changelog:
V2 -> V3:
   1. xfs/270: Fix regular expresssion used in inline awk script to
      match hex number.

V1 -> V2:
   1. xfs/270: Replace bashisms with inline awk scripts.
   2. Use _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported helper in _require_xfs_nrext64().
   3. Remove invocation of $XFS_INFO_PROG from _require_xfs_nrext64().
   4. Use xfs_db's 'path' command instead of saving test file's inode
      number in the two new tests introduced by the patchset.

Chandan Babu R (4):
  xfs/270: Fix ro mount failure when nrext64 option is enabled
  common/xfs: Add helper to check if nrext64 option is supported
  xfs: Verify that the correct inode extent counters are updated
    with/without nrext64
  xfs: Verify correctness of upgrading an fs to support large extent
    counters

 common/xfs        |  12 +++++
 tests/xfs/270     |  26 ++++++++++-
 tests/xfs/270.out |   1 -
 tests/xfs/547     |  92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/xfs/547.out |  13 ++++++
 tests/xfs/548     | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/xfs/548.out |  12 +++++
 7 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 tests/xfs/547
 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/547.out
 create mode 100755 tests/xfs/548
 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/548.out

Comments

Darrick J. Wong June 22, 2022, 5:02 p.m. UTC | #1

On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 04:40:33PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patchset adds two tests for verifying the behaviour of Large
> extent counters feature. It also fixes xfs/270 test failure when
> executed on a filesystem with Large extent counters enabled.
> 
> Changelog:
> V2 -> V3:
>    1. xfs/270: Fix regular expresssion used in inline awk script to
>       match hex number.

Why did all the patches lose their RVB tags?

--D

> V1 -> V2:
>    1. xfs/270: Replace bashisms with inline awk scripts.
>    2. Use _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported helper in _require_xfs_nrext64().
>    3. Remove invocation of $XFS_INFO_PROG from _require_xfs_nrext64().
>    4. Use xfs_db's 'path' command instead of saving test file's inode
>       number in the two new tests introduced by the patchset.
> 
> Chandan Babu R (4):
>   xfs/270: Fix ro mount failure when nrext64 option is enabled
>   common/xfs: Add helper to check if nrext64 option is supported
>   xfs: Verify that the correct inode extent counters are updated
>     with/without nrext64
>   xfs: Verify correctness of upgrading an fs to support large extent
>     counters
> 
>  common/xfs        |  12 +++++
>  tests/xfs/270     |  26 ++++++++++-
>  tests/xfs/270.out |   1 -
>  tests/xfs/547     |  92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/547.out |  13 ++++++
>  tests/xfs/548     | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/548.out |  12 +++++
>  7 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/547
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/547.out
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/548
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/548.out
> 
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>