| Message ID | ba65356c-2b57-75fb-0436-804913285809@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@kernel.org>
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
[172.30.200.125])
by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D998414BD
for <patchwork-linux-xfs@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3A729B2C
for <patchwork-linux-xfs@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
id B052729BB0; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633B129B2C
for <patchwork-linux-xfs@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S1727453AbeIYJBi (ORCPT
<rfc822;patchwork-linux-xfs@patchwork.kernel.org>);
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:01:38 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53170 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S1726340AbeIYJBi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>);
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:01:38 -0400
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
[10.5.11.15])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0F4356EF
for <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4])
by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0B81ACBA
for <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2 V3] xfs: validate size vs format
Message-ID: <ba65356c-2b57-75fb-0436-804913285809@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:56:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted,
not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]);
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
|
| Series |
xfs: validate size vs format
|
expand
|
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:56:18PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Once more with more macros and better comments They both look fine to me... Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> --D