mbox series

[PATCHv2,0/2] iomap: Optimize read_folio

Message ID cover.1715067055.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series iomap: Optimize read_folio | expand

Message

Ritesh Harjani (IBM) May 7, 2024, 8:55 a.m. UTC
Hello,

Please find these two patches which were identified while working on ext2
buffered-io conversion to iomap. One of them is a bug fix and the other one
optimizes the read_folio path. More details can be found in individual
commit messages.

[v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1714046808.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/

Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (2):
  iomap: Fix iomap_adjust_read_range for plen calculation
  iomap: Optimize iomap_read_folio

 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
2.44.0

Comments

Ritesh Harjani (IBM) June 4, 2024, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #1
+Christian

"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Please find these two patches which were identified while working on ext2
> buffered-io conversion to iomap. One of them is a bug fix and the other one
> optimizes the read_folio path. More details can be found in individual
> commit messages.
>
> [v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1714046808.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
>
> Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (2):
>   iomap: Fix iomap_adjust_read_range for plen calculation
>   iomap: Optimize iomap_read_folio

Hi Christian, 

I guess these 2 patches are not picked yet into the tree? In case if
these are missed could you please pick them up for inclusion?

-ritesh


>
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.44.0
Christoph Hellwig June 4, 2024, 4:11 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:02:41AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (2):
> >   iomap: Fix iomap_adjust_read_range for plen calculation
> >   iomap: Optimize iomap_read_folio
> 
> Hi Christian, 
> 
> I guess these 2 patches are not picked yet into the tree? In case if
> these are missed could you please pick them up for inclusion?

The first one sounds like a 6.10 candidate, the other ones is probably
6.11 material at this point.