From patchwork Thu Jul 21 04:58:17 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Darrick J. Wong" X-Patchwork-Id: 9240841 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D5160756 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA11B1FF15 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id DEC7927C38; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from oss.sgi.com (oss.sgi.com [192.48.182.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E6F1FF15 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AA57CF4; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:58:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Delivered-To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757807CED for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:58:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91A8AC001 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:58:23 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1469077102-04bdf060e2223a0001-NocioJ Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8RxXbyqXR33pYK55 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:58:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: darrick.wong@oracle.com X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: userp1040.oracle.com[156.151.31.81] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 156.151.31.81 Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u6L4wJHi022506 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:20 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6L4wJtf007760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:19 GMT Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6L4wIEY017750; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 04:58:19 GMT Received: from localhost (/24.21.211.40) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:58:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 20/47] xfs: increase XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS to fit the rmapbt From: "Darrick J. Wong" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH 20/47] xfs: increase XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS to fit the rmapbt To: david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:58:17 -0700 Message-ID: <146907709719.25461.3104352212846077948.stgit@birch.djwong.org> In-Reply-To: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> References: <146907695530.25461.3225785294902719773.stgit@birch.djwong.org> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-Barracuda-Connect: userp1040.oracle.com[156.151.31.81] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1469077102 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 X-Barracuda-URL: https://192.48.157.11:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 883 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.7 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.31417 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header 0.00 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, bfoster@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com X-BeenThere: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP By my calculations, a 1,073,741,824 block AG with a 1k block size can attain a maximum height of 9. Assuming a record size of 24 bytes, a key/ptr size of 44 bytes, and half-full btree nodes, we'd need 53,687,092 blocks for the records and ~6 million blocks for the keys. That requires a btree of height 9. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Brian Foster --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h index b8bbb21..629ef4f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ do { \ } \ } while (0) -#define XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS 8 /* max of all btrees */ +#define XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS 9 /* max of all btrees */ struct xfs_btree_ops { /* size of the key and record structures */