| Message ID | 152167311132.5268.8502709708606276650.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > xfs_break_dax_layouts(), similar to xfs_break_leased_layouts(), scans > for busy / pinned dax pages and waits for those pages to go idle before > any potential extent unmap operation. > > dax_layout_busy_page() handles synchronizing against new page-busy > events (get_user_pages). It invalidates all mappings to trigger the > get_user_pages slow path which will eventually block on the xfs inode > lock held in XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL mode. If dax_layout_busy_page() finds a > busy page it returns it for xfs to wait for the page-idle event that > will fire when the page reference count reaches 1 (recall ZONE_DEVICE > pages are idle at count 1, see generic_dax_pagefree()). > > While waiting, the XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL lock is dropped in order to not > deadlock the process that might be trying to elevate the page count of > more pages before arranging for any of them to go idle. I.e. the typical > case of submitting I/O is that iov_iter_get_pages() elevates the > reference count of all pages in the I/O before starting I/O on the first > page. The process of elevating the reference count of all pages involved > in an I/O may cause faults that need to take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL. > > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> > Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > index 7f37fadf007e..d4573f93fddb 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > @@ -752,6 +752,38 @@ xfs_file_write_iter( > return ret; > } > > +static void > +xfs_wait_var_event( > + struct inode *inode, > + uint iolock, > + bool *did_unlock) > +{ > + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode); > + > + *did_unlock = true; > + xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock); > + schedule(); > + xfs_ilock(ip, iolock); > +} > + > +static int > +xfs_break_dax_layouts( > + struct inode *inode, > + uint iolock, > + bool *did_unlock) > +{ > + struct page *page; > + > + *did_unlock = false; > + page = dax_layout_busy_page(inode->i_mapping); > + if (!page) > + return 0; > + > + return ___wait_var_event(&page->_refcount, > + atomic_read(&page->_refcount) == 1, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, > + 0, 0, xfs_wait_var_event(inode, iolock, did_unlock)); > +} > + > int > xfs_break_layouts( > struct inode *inode, > @@ -766,16 +798,23 @@ xfs_break_layouts( > | (reason == BREAK_UNMAPI > ? XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL : 0))); > > - switch (reason) { > - case BREAK_UNMAPI: > - /* fall through */ > - case BREAK_WRITE: > - error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &did_unlock); > - break; > - default: > - error = -EINVAL; > - break; > - } > + do { > + switch (reason) { > + case BREAK_UNMAPI: > + error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, > + &did_unlock); > + /* fall through */ > + case BREAK_WRITE: > + if (error || did_unlock) > + break; > + error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, > + &did_unlock); > + break; > + default: > + error = -EINVAL; > + break; > + } > + } while (error == 0 && did_unlock); Nitpick: I think did_unlock should probably be called done in this context, and how about something like this: for (;;) { switch (reason) { case BREAK_UNMAPI: error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, &done); if (error || done) return error; /*fallthrough*/ case BREAK_WRITE: error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &done); if (error || done) return error; break; default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return -EINVAL; } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> xfs_break_dax_layouts(), similar to xfs_break_leased_layouts(), scans >> for busy / pinned dax pages and waits for those pages to go idle before >> any potential extent unmap operation. >> >> dax_layout_busy_page() handles synchronizing against new page-busy >> events (get_user_pages). It invalidates all mappings to trigger the >> get_user_pages slow path which will eventually block on the xfs inode >> lock held in XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL mode. If dax_layout_busy_page() finds a >> busy page it returns it for xfs to wait for the page-idle event that >> will fire when the page reference count reaches 1 (recall ZONE_DEVICE >> pages are idle at count 1, see generic_dax_pagefree()). >> >> While waiting, the XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL lock is dropped in order to not >> deadlock the process that might be trying to elevate the page count of >> more pages before arranging for any of them to go idle. I.e. the typical >> case of submitting I/O is that iov_iter_get_pages() elevates the >> reference count of all pages in the I/O before starting I/O on the first >> page. The process of elevating the reference count of all pages involved >> in an I/O may cause faults that need to take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL. >> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> >> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> >> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> >> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> >> --- >> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c >> index 7f37fadf007e..d4573f93fddb 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c >> @@ -752,6 +752,38 @@ xfs_file_write_iter( >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static void >> +xfs_wait_var_event( >> + struct inode *inode, >> + uint iolock, >> + bool *did_unlock) >> +{ >> + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode); >> + >> + *did_unlock = true; >> + xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock); >> + schedule(); >> + xfs_ilock(ip, iolock); >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +xfs_break_dax_layouts( >> + struct inode *inode, >> + uint iolock, >> + bool *did_unlock) >> +{ >> + struct page *page; >> + >> + *did_unlock = false; >> + page = dax_layout_busy_page(inode->i_mapping); >> + if (!page) >> + return 0; >> + >> + return ___wait_var_event(&page->_refcount, >> + atomic_read(&page->_refcount) == 1, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, >> + 0, 0, xfs_wait_var_event(inode, iolock, did_unlock)); >> +} >> + >> int >> xfs_break_layouts( >> struct inode *inode, >> @@ -766,16 +798,23 @@ xfs_break_layouts( >> | (reason == BREAK_UNMAPI >> ? XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL : 0))); >> >> - switch (reason) { >> - case BREAK_UNMAPI: >> - /* fall through */ >> - case BREAK_WRITE: >> - error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &did_unlock); >> - break; >> - default: >> - error = -EINVAL; >> - break; >> - } >> + do { >> + switch (reason) { >> + case BREAK_UNMAPI: >> + error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, >> + &did_unlock); >> + /* fall through */ >> + case BREAK_WRITE: >> + if (error || did_unlock) >> + break; >> + error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, >> + &did_unlock); >> + break; >> + default: >> + error = -EINVAL; >> + break; >> + } >> + } while (error == 0 && did_unlock); > > Nitpick: I think did_unlock should probably be called done in this context, > and how about something like this: > > for (;;) { > switch (reason) { > case BREAK_UNMAPI: > error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, &done); > if (error || done) > return error; > /*fallthrough*/ > case BREAK_WRITE: > error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &done); > if (error || done) > return error; > break; > default: > WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > return -EINVAL; > } > } I can switch to the for() loop model, but it isn't 'done' flag, it's a 'retry' flag. I.e. if xfs_break_leased_layouts() dropped XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL we need to retry xfs_break_dax_layouts(), and if xfs_break_dax_layouts() slept we need to immediately retry it. So, how about this? for (;;) { switch (reason) { case BREAK_UNMAP: ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(XFS_I(inode), XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)); error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, &retry); if (error) return error; if (retry) continue; /* fall through */ case BREAK_WRITE: error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &retry); if (error || !retry) return error; continue; default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return -EINVAL; } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:28:11AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > I can switch to the for() loop model, but it isn't 'done' flag, it's a > 'retry' flag. I.e. if xfs_break_leased_layouts() dropped > XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL we need to retry xfs_break_dax_layouts(), and if Oh, indeed. > xfs_break_dax_layouts() slept we need to immediately retry it. > So, how > about this? Ah, with that that the loop doesn't work too well, especially the continue inside a switch statement is probably not to good. I guess we should just stick to your original, modulo better variable naming. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c index 7f37fadf007e..d4573f93fddb 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c @@ -752,6 +752,38 @@ xfs_file_write_iter( return ret; } +static void +xfs_wait_var_event( + struct inode *inode, + uint iolock, + bool *did_unlock) +{ + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode); + + *did_unlock = true; + xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock); + schedule(); + xfs_ilock(ip, iolock); +} + +static int +xfs_break_dax_layouts( + struct inode *inode, + uint iolock, + bool *did_unlock) +{ + struct page *page; + + *did_unlock = false; + page = dax_layout_busy_page(inode->i_mapping); + if (!page) + return 0; + + return ___wait_var_event(&page->_refcount, + atomic_read(&page->_refcount) == 1, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, + 0, 0, xfs_wait_var_event(inode, iolock, did_unlock)); +} + int xfs_break_layouts( struct inode *inode, @@ -766,16 +798,23 @@ xfs_break_layouts( | (reason == BREAK_UNMAPI ? XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL : 0))); - switch (reason) { - case BREAK_UNMAPI: - /* fall through */ - case BREAK_WRITE: - error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &did_unlock); - break; - default: - error = -EINVAL; - break; - } + do { + switch (reason) { + case BREAK_UNMAPI: + error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, *iolock, + &did_unlock); + /* fall through */ + case BREAK_WRITE: + if (error || did_unlock) + break; + error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, + &did_unlock); + break; + default: + error = -EINVAL; + break; + } + } while (error == 0 && did_unlock); return error; }