From patchwork Tue Sep 15 01:44:43 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Darrick J. Wong" X-Patchwork-Id: 11775255 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F80E618 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63335208DB for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="akX74dDu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726095AbgIOBot (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:44:49 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:45772 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726019AbgIOBos (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:44:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F1hxtO147347; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:46 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=subject : from : to : cc : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=AGvHyhQYdidQEllW/LNOOp8Px+ACBFNYf/vzQHP2Ats=; b=akX74dDuG52QWX1pBj2w1DXNF3TffA5pQwPABSHk2TtH0yzGJtiax8shDVHVjsnk3JFV GvIFPCpMUqncwOGiRVBC+2JVIYqjvmfkfUzajycVbekhe1uc3K5h//Lsvxy5RdBOrQ2y LirafI8gA7PyKkoB+yICLj9rnCpUglE+VYEuyv/B+UfI3QvPV5zmdNQaFiIdqnGAgx5n lrRoQMXVL/xJc/Nqya3mgCohMZGZmVn6eV0zcwWBHnLVys9O82mPGKCO5orm/fdNcGyx M0GB9nDvgFh97NuVObiUOo6fWpKxpvpmgXnPdgv2wUZLteL0VD6anMMwR4B91QAnphRk 4g== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gnrqsxwd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:46 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F1dsh2075961; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:45 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33h7wn6htq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:45 +0000 Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08F1ij07001487; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:45 GMT Received: from localhost (/10.159.147.241) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:44:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 17/24] xfs: refactor _xfs_check calls to the scratch device From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: darrick.wong@oracle.com, guaneryu@gmail.com Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:44:43 -0700 Message-ID: <160013428386.2923511.798805055641192515.stgit@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <160013417420.2923511.6825722200699287884.stgit@magnolia> References: <160013417420.2923511.6825722200699287884.stgit@magnolia> User-Agent: StGit/0.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150011 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150012 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org From: Darrick J. Wong Use _scratch_xfs_check, not _xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- tests/xfs/291 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/xfs/291 b/tests/xfs/291 index 8a4b1354..adef2536 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/291 +++ b/tests/xfs/291 @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ done _scratch_unmount # Can xfs_repair and xfs_check cope with this monster? _scratch_xfs_repair >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_repair failed" -_xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed" +_scratch_xfs_check >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed" # Yes they can! Now... # Can xfs_metadump cope with this monster?