diff mbox series

[1/2] xfs: hoist refcount record merge predicates

Message ID 166975929118.3768925.9568770405264708473.stgit@magnolia (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series xfs: fix broken MAXREFCOUNT handling | expand

Commit Message

Darrick J. Wong Nov. 29, 2022, 10:01 p.m. UTC
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Hoist these multiline conditionals into separate static inline helpers
to improve readability and set the stage for corruption fixes that will
be introduced in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Dave Chinner Nov. 29, 2022, 10:35 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:01:31PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> Hoist these multiline conditionals into separate static inline helpers
> to improve readability and set the stage for corruption fixes that will
> be introduced in the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Looks OK. Minor nit below.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> index 3f34bafe18dd..8c68994d09f3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> @@ -815,11 +815,116 @@ xfs_refcount_find_right_extents(
>  /* Is this extent valid? */
>  static inline bool
>  xfs_refc_valid(
> -	struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
> +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
>  {
>  	return rc->rc_startblock != NULLAGBLOCK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool
> +xfs_refc_want_merge_center(
> +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*left,
> +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cleft,
> +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cright,
> +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*right,
> +	bool				cleft_is_cright,
> +	enum xfs_refc_adjust_op		adjust,
> +	unsigned long long		*ulenp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long		ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * To merge with a center record, both shoulder records must be
> +	 * adjacent to the record we want to adjust.  This is only true if
> +	 * find_left and find_right made all four records valid.
> +	 */
> +	if (!xfs_refc_valid(left)  || !xfs_refc_valid(right) ||
> +	    !xfs_refc_valid(cleft) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* There must only be one record for the entire range. */
> +	if (!cleft_is_cright)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* The shoulder record refcounts must match the new refcount. */
> +	if (left->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
> +		return false;
> +	if (right->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length.  The funny computation
> +	 * of ulen avoids casting.
> +	 */
> +	ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount + right->rc_blockcount;
> +	if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
> +		return false;

The comment took me a bit of spelunking to decipher what the "funny
computation" was. Better to spell it out directly (catch u32
overflows) than just hint that there's somethign special about it.
Say:

	/*
	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length. ulen is a
	 * ULL as the individual record block counts can be up to
	 * (u32 - 1) in length hence we need to catch u32 addition
	 * overflows here.
	 */

Cheers,

Dave.
Darrick J. Wong Nov. 30, 2022, 12:13 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:35:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:01:31PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Hoist these multiline conditionals into separate static inline helpers
> > to improve readability and set the stage for corruption fixes that will
> > be introduced in the next patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks OK. Minor nit below.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> > index 3f34bafe18dd..8c68994d09f3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
> > @@ -815,11 +815,116 @@ xfs_refcount_find_right_extents(
> >  /* Is this extent valid? */
> >  static inline bool
> >  xfs_refc_valid(
> > -	struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
> > +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
> >  {
> >  	return rc->rc_startblock != NULLAGBLOCK;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool
> > +xfs_refc_want_merge_center(
> > +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*left,
> > +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cleft,
> > +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cright,
> > +	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*right,
> > +	bool				cleft_is_cright,
> > +	enum xfs_refc_adjust_op		adjust,
> > +	unsigned long long		*ulenp)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long long		ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * To merge with a center record, both shoulder records must be
> > +	 * adjacent to the record we want to adjust.  This is only true if
> > +	 * find_left and find_right made all four records valid.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!xfs_refc_valid(left)  || !xfs_refc_valid(right) ||
> > +	    !xfs_refc_valid(cleft) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* There must only be one record for the entire range. */
> > +	if (!cleft_is_cright)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* The shoulder record refcounts must match the new refcount. */
> > +	if (left->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
> > +		return false;
> > +	if (right->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length.  The funny computation
> > +	 * of ulen avoids casting.
> > +	 */
> > +	ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount + right->rc_blockcount;
> > +	if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
> > +		return false;
> 
> The comment took me a bit of spelunking to decipher what the "funny
> computation" was. Better to spell it out directly (catch u32
> overflows) than just hint that there's somethign special about it.
> Say:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length. ulen is a
> 	 * ULL as the individual record block counts can be up to
> 	 * (u32 - 1) in length hence we need to catch u32 addition
> 	 * overflows here.
> 	 */

Done; thanks for the quick review!

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
Xiao Yang Nov. 30, 2022, 9:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2022/11/30 6:01, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> Hoist these multiline conditionals into separate static inline helpers
> to improve readability and set the stage for corruption fixes that will
> be introduced in the next patch.
Hi Darrick,

It's a good refactoring. LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
index 3f34bafe18dd..8c68994d09f3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount.c
@@ -815,11 +815,116 @@  xfs_refcount_find_right_extents(
 /* Is this extent valid? */
 static inline bool
 xfs_refc_valid(
-	struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*rc)
 {
 	return rc->rc_startblock != NULLAGBLOCK;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+xfs_refc_want_merge_center(
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*left,
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cleft,
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cright,
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*right,
+	bool				cleft_is_cright,
+	enum xfs_refc_adjust_op		adjust,
+	unsigned long long		*ulenp)
+{
+	unsigned long long		ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
+
+	/*
+	 * To merge with a center record, both shoulder records must be
+	 * adjacent to the record we want to adjust.  This is only true if
+	 * find_left and find_right made all four records valid.
+	 */
+	if (!xfs_refc_valid(left)  || !xfs_refc_valid(right) ||
+	    !xfs_refc_valid(cleft) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
+		return false;
+
+	/* There must only be one record for the entire range. */
+	if (!cleft_is_cright)
+		return false;
+
+	/* The shoulder record refcounts must match the new refcount. */
+	if (left->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
+		return false;
+	if (right->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length.  The funny computation
+	 * of ulen avoids casting.
+	 */
+	ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount + right->rc_blockcount;
+	if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
+		return false;
+
+	*ulenp = ulen;
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool
+xfs_refc_want_merge_left(
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*left,
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cleft,
+	enum xfs_refc_adjust_op		adjust)
+{
+	unsigned long long		ulen = left->rc_blockcount;
+
+	/*
+	 * For a left merge, the left shoulder record must be adjacent to the
+	 * start of the range.  If this is true, find_left made left and cleft
+	 * contain valid contents.
+	 */
+	if (!xfs_refc_valid(left) || !xfs_refc_valid(cleft))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Left shoulder record refcount must match the new refcount. */
+	if (left->rc_refcount != cleft->rc_refcount + adjust)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length.  The funny computation
+	 * of ulen avoids casting.
+	 */
+	ulen += cleft->rc_blockcount;
+	if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool
+xfs_refc_want_merge_right(
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*cright,
+	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*right,
+	enum xfs_refc_adjust_op		adjust)
+{
+	unsigned long long		ulen = right->rc_blockcount;
+
+	/*
+	 * For a right merge, the right shoulder record must be adjacent to the
+	 * end of the range.  If this is true, find_right made cright and right
+	 * contain valid contents.
+	 */
+	if (!xfs_refc_valid(right) || !xfs_refc_valid(cright))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Right shoulder record refcount must match the new refcount. */
+	if (right->rc_refcount != cright->rc_refcount + adjust)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The new record cannot exceed the max length.  The funny computation
+	 * of ulen avoids casting.
+	 */
+	ulen += cright->rc_blockcount;
+	if (ulen >= MAXREFCEXTLEN)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Try to merge with any extents on the boundaries of the adjustment range.
  */
@@ -861,23 +966,15 @@  xfs_refcount_merge_extents(
 		 (cleft.rc_blockcount == cright.rc_blockcount);
 
 	/* Try to merge left, cleft, and right.  cleft must == cright. */
-	ulen = (unsigned long long)left.rc_blockcount + cleft.rc_blockcount +
-			right.rc_blockcount;
-	if (xfs_refc_valid(&left) && xfs_refc_valid(&right) &&
-	    xfs_refc_valid(&cleft) && xfs_refc_valid(&cright) && cequal &&
-	    left.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
-	    right.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
-	    ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
+	if (xfs_refc_want_merge_center(&left, &cleft, &cright, &right, cequal,
+				adjust, &ulen)) {
 		*shape_changed = true;
 		return xfs_refcount_merge_center_extents(cur, &left, &cleft,
 				&right, ulen, aglen);
 	}
 
 	/* Try to merge left and cleft. */
-	ulen = (unsigned long long)left.rc_blockcount + cleft.rc_blockcount;
-	if (xfs_refc_valid(&left) && xfs_refc_valid(&cleft) &&
-	    left.rc_refcount == cleft.rc_refcount + adjust &&
-	    ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
+	if (xfs_refc_want_merge_left(&left, &cleft, adjust)) {
 		*shape_changed = true;
 		error = xfs_refcount_merge_left_extent(cur, &left, &cleft,
 				agbno, aglen);
@@ -893,10 +990,7 @@  xfs_refcount_merge_extents(
 	}
 
 	/* Try to merge cright and right. */
-	ulen = (unsigned long long)right.rc_blockcount + cright.rc_blockcount;
-	if (xfs_refc_valid(&right) && xfs_refc_valid(&cright) &&
-	    right.rc_refcount == cright.rc_refcount + adjust &&
-	    ulen < MAXREFCEXTLEN) {
+	if (xfs_refc_want_merge_right(&cright, &right, adjust)) {
 		*shape_changed = true;
 		return xfs_refcount_merge_right_extent(cur, &right, &cright,
 				aglen);