Message ID | 169704721239.1773611.10087575278257926892.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | xfs: refactor rt extent unit conversions | expand |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:05:27AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > > Create helpers to do unit conversions of rt block numbers to rt extent > numbers. There are two variations -- the suffix "t" denotes the one > that returns only the truncated extent number; the other one also > returns the misalignment. Convert all the div_u64_rem users; we'll do > the do_div users in the next patch. When trying to work with thee helpers I found the t prefix here a bit weird, as it works different than the T in say XFS_B_TO_FSB vs XFS_B_TO_FSBT which give you different results for the two versions. Here we get the same returned result, just with the additional return for the remainder. Maybe have xfs_rtb_to_rtx and xfs_rtb_to_rtx_rem for the version with the modulo? We also have quite a few places that only care about the mod, so an additĘ£onal xfs_rtb_rem/mod might be useful as well.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 07:17:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:05:27AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > > > > Create helpers to do unit conversions of rt block numbers to rt extent > > numbers. There are two variations -- the suffix "t" denotes the one > > that returns only the truncated extent number; the other one also > > returns the misalignment. Convert all the div_u64_rem users; we'll do > > the do_div users in the next patch. > > When trying to work with thee helpers I found the t prefix here a bit > weird, as it works different than the T in say XFS_B_TO_FSB > vs XFS_B_TO_FSBT which give you different results for the two versions. > Here we get the same returned result, just with the additional > return for the remainder. > > Maybe have xfs_rtb_to_rtx and xfs_rtb_to_rtx_rem for the version with > the modulo? <nod> I've decided to go with: /* Convert an rt block number into an rt extent number. */ static inline xfs_rtxnum_t xfs_rtb_to_rtx( struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_rtblock_t rtbno) { return div_u64(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize); } /* Return the offset of an rt block number within an rt extent. */ static inline xfs_extlen_t xfs_rtb_to_rtxoff( struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_rtblock_t rtbno) { return do_div(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize); } /* * Crack an rt block number into an rt extent number and an offset within that * rt extent. Returns the rt extent number directly and the offset in @off. */ static inline xfs_rtxnum_t xfs_rtb_to_rtxrem( struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_rtblock_t rtbno, xfs_extlen_t *off) { return div_u64_rem(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, off); } > We also have quite a few places that only care about the mod, > so an additĘ£onal xfs_rtb_rem/mod might be useful as well. Agreed, I had noticed that there were a fair number of places where we're really only checking for rtx alignment. xfs_rtb_to_rtxoff is the new helper. --D
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:58:33AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> <nod> I've decided to go with:
This looks good to me, thanks.
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c index 82dc95944374e..463174af94333 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c @@ -5336,7 +5336,6 @@ __xfs_bunmapi( int tmp_logflags; /* partial logging flags */ int wasdel; /* was a delayed alloc extent */ int whichfork; /* data or attribute fork */ - xfs_fsblock_t sum; xfs_filblks_t len = *rlen; /* length to unmap in file */ xfs_fileoff_t end; struct xfs_iext_cursor icur; @@ -5433,8 +5432,7 @@ __xfs_bunmapi( if (!isrt || (flags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) goto delete; - sum = del.br_startblock + del.br_blockcount; - div_u64_rem(sum, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del.br_startblock + del.br_blockcount, &mod); if (mod) { /* * Realtime extent not lined up at the end. @@ -5481,7 +5479,8 @@ __xfs_bunmapi( goto error0; goto nodelete; } - div_u64_rem(del.br_startblock, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del.br_startblock, &mod); if (mod) { xfs_extlen_t off = mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize - mod; diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c index ce14436811319..de54386cf52f3 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c @@ -1031,13 +1031,13 @@ xfs_rtfree_blocks( ASSERT(rtlen <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN); - len = div_u64_rem(rtlen, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + len = xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, rtlen, &mod); if (mod) { ASSERT(mod == 0); return -EIO; } - start = div_u64_rem(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + start = xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, rtbno, &mod); if (mod) { ASSERT(mod == 0); return -EIO; diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.h index e2a36fc157c4c..bdd4858a794c2 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.h +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.h @@ -39,6 +39,23 @@ xfs_extlen_to_rtxlen( return len / mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize; } +static inline xfs_rtxnum_t +xfs_rtb_to_rtx( + struct xfs_mount *mp, + xfs_rtblock_t rtbno, + xfs_extlen_t *mod) +{ + return div_u64_rem(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, mod); +} + +static inline xfs_rtxnum_t +xfs_rtb_to_rtxt( + struct xfs_mount *mp, + xfs_rtblock_t rtbno) +{ + return div_u64(rtbno, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize); +} + /* * Functions for walking free space rtextents in the realtime bitmap. */ diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_swapext.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_swapext.c index b1d66e0cfac91..6107ec7d8d568 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_swapext.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_swapext.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #include "xfs_dir2_priv.h" #include "xfs_dir2.h" #include "xfs_symlink_remote.h" +#include "xfs_rtbitmap.h" struct kmem_cache *xfs_swapext_intent_cache; @@ -202,19 +203,19 @@ xfs_swapext_check_rt_extents( irec2.br_blockcount); /* Both mappings must be aligned to the realtime extent size. */ - div_u64_rem(irec1.br_startoff, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, irec1.br_startoff, &mod); if (mod) { ASSERT(mod == 0); return -EINVAL; } - div_u64_rem(irec2.br_startoff, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, irec1.br_startoff, &mod); if (mod) { ASSERT(mod == 0); return -EINVAL; } - div_u64_rem(irec1.br_blockcount, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &mod); + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, irec1.br_blockcount, &mod); if (mod) { ASSERT(mod == 0); return -EINVAL; diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c index 4bb776911a4fb..d3a5112f21156 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c @@ -1496,16 +1496,16 @@ xfs_rtfile_want_conversion( struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec) { xfs_fileoff_t rext_next; - uint32_t modoff, modcnt; + xfs_extlen_t modoff, modcnt; if (irec->br_state != XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN) return false; - div_u64_rem(irec->br_startoff, mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &modoff); + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, irec->br_startoff, &modoff); if (modoff == 0) { - uint64_t rexts = div_u64_rem(irec->br_blockcount, - mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, &modcnt); + xfs_rtbxlen_t rexts; + rexts = xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, irec->br_blockcount, &modcnt); if (rexts > 0) { /* * Unwritten mapping starts at an rt extent boundary