| Message ID | 20161201101800.11419-1-eguan@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c index c962999..b930be0 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ xfs_vn_setattr( return error; xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL); - error = xfs_setattr_size(ip, iattr); + error = xfs_vn_setattr_size(dentry, iattr); xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL); } else { error = xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize(dentry, iattr);
Commit 6552321831dc ("xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead") introduced a regression that truncate(2) doesn't check on new size, so it succeeds even if the new size exceeds the current resource limit. Because xfs_setattr_size() was used instead of xfs_vn_setattr_size(), and the latter calls xfs_vn_change_ok() first to do sanity check on permission and new size. This is found by truncate03 test from ltp, and the following is a simplified reproducer: #!/bin/bash dev=/dev/sda5 mnt=/mnt/xfs mkfs -t xfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt # set max file size to 16k ulimit -f 16 truncate -s $((16 * 1024 + 1)) /mnt/xfs/testfile [ $? -eq 0 ] && echo "FAIL: truncate exceeded max file size" ulimit -f unlimited umount $mnt Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)