| Message ID | 20171109132656.1649-2-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c index 00d660dcb05e..85d7f708eafc 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c @@ -555,16 +555,13 @@ xfs_iext_split_leaf( int i; /* for sequential append operations just spill over into the new node */ - if (cur->pos == KEYS_PER_NODE) { + if (cur->pos == RECS_PER_LEAF) { cur->leaf = new; cur->pos = 0; *nr_entries = 0; goto done; } - if (nr_keep & 1) - nr_keep++; - for (i = 0; i < nr_move; i++) { new->recs[i] = leaf->recs[nr_keep + i]; xfs_iext_rec_clear(&leaf->recs[nr_keep + i]);
Fix to check the correct value, and remove a duplicate handling of the uneven record number split algorith, Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)