diff mbox

xfs: handle register_shrinker error

Message ID 20171123161137.ncjqskbvdm6dgb3z@dhcp22.suse.cz (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Michal Hocko Nov. 23, 2017, 4:11 p.m. UTC
On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Looks good,
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > > I can take a stab at the quota one.
> > 
> > That would be really great!
> > 
> Again, it does not look good. Since kmem_free() does only kvfree(),
> nothing will release memory allocated by list_lru_init().

Hmm, you are right. I have (blindly) followed the current code flow
which is wrong as well. The following should do the trick. Should I
split that into two patches?
---

Comments

Tetsuo Handa Nov. 23, 2017, 4:17 p.m. UTC | #1
Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hmm, you are right. I have (blindly) followed the current code flow
> which is wrong as well. The following should do the trick. Should I
> split that into two patches?

Well, xfs_alloc_buftarg() needs to be more careful.

xfs_alloc_buftarg(
        struct xfs_mount        *mp,
        struct block_device     *bdev,
        struct dax_device       *dax_dev)
{
        xfs_buftarg_t           *btp;

        btp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*btp), KM_SLEEP | KM_NOFS); // This is GFP_NOFS context. But...

        btp->bt_mount = mp;
        btp->bt_dev =  bdev->bd_dev;
        btp->bt_bdev = bdev;
        btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev;

        if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev))
                goto error;

        if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) // This is GFP_KERNEL context.
                goto error;

        if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) // This is GFP_KERNEL context.
                goto error; // Need to undo list_lru_init() before kmem_free().

        btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
        btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
        btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
        btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
        register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); // This is GFP_KERNEL context.
        return btp;

error:
        kmem_free(btp);
        return NULL;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Michal Hocko Nov. 23, 2017, 4:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri 24-11-17 01:17:12, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hmm, you are right. I have (blindly) followed the current code flow
> > which is wrong as well. The following should do the trick. Should I
> > split that into two patches?
> 
> Well, xfs_alloc_buftarg() needs to be more careful.
[...]
>         btp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*btp), KM_SLEEP | KM_NOFS); // This is GFP_NOFS context. But...
[...]
>         if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) // This is GFP_KERNEL context.

this sounds like a separate thing to cleanup or document.
Dave Chinner Nov. 23, 2017, 10 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Looks good,
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > > I can take a stab at the quota one.
> > > 
> > > That would be really great!
> > > 
> > Again, it does not look good. Since kmem_free() does only kvfree(),
> > nothing will release memory allocated by list_lru_init().
> 
> Hmm, you are right. I have (blindly) followed the current code flow
> which is wrong as well. The following should do the trick. Should I
> split that into two patches?

One is fine by me - if we're need to backport one fix, then we need
to backport both :/

> ---
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index dd0e18af990c..4c6e86d861fd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1815,25 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg(
>  	btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev;
>  
>  	if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev))
> -		goto error;
> +		goto error_free;
>  
>  	if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru))
> -		goto error;
> +		goto error_free;
>  
>  	if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
> -		goto error;
> +		goto error_lru;
>  
>  	btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
>  	btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
>  	btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
>  	btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
> -	if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) {
> -		percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
> -		goto error;
> -	}
> +	if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker))
> +		goto error_pcpu;
>  	return btp;
>  
> -error:
> +error_pcpu:
> +	percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
> +error_lru:
> +	list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
> +error_free:
>  	kmem_free(btp);
>  	return NULL;

That should do the trick.

Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index dd0e18af990c..4c6e86d861fd 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1815,25 +1815,27 @@  xfs_alloc_buftarg(
 	btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev;
 
 	if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev))
-		goto error;
+		goto error_free;
 
 	if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru))
-		goto error;
+		goto error_free;
 
 	if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
-		goto error;
+		goto error_lru;
 
 	btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
 	btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
 	btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
 	btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
-	if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) {
-		percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
-		goto error;
-	}
+	if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker))
+		goto error_pcpu;
 	return btp;
 
-error:
+error_pcpu:
+	percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
+error_lru:
+	list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
+error_free:
 	kmem_free(btp);
 	return NULL;
 }