Message ID | 20171124073957.3z4hjwg5exqw277h@dhcp22.suse.cz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:39:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 24-11-17 09:00:46, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > > Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > Looks good, > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > I can take a stab at the quota one. > > > > > > > > > > That would be really great! > > > > > > > > > Again, it does not look good. Since kmem_free() does only kvfree(), > > > > nothing will release memory allocated by list_lru_init(). > > > > > > Hmm, you are right. I have (blindly) followed the current code flow > > > which is wrong as well. The following should do the trick. Should I > > > split that into two patches? > > > > One is fine by me - if we're need to backport one fix, then we need > > to backport both :/ > > OK > > > > --- > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > index dd0e18af990c..4c6e86d861fd 100644 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > @@ -1815,25 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg( > > > btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev; > > > > > > if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_free; > > > > > > if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_free; > > > > > > if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_lru; > > > > > > btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; > > > - if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) { > > > - percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); > > > - goto error; > > > - } > > > + if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) > > > + goto error_pcpu; > > > return btp; > > > > > > -error: > > > +error_pcpu: > > > + percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); > > > +error_lru: > > > + list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); > > > +error_free: > > > kmem_free(btp); > > > return NULL; > > > > That should do the trick. > > > > Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > > Thanks. Updated patch below > --- > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling > > percpu_counter_init failure path doesn't clean up &btp->bt_lru list. > Call list_lru_destroy in that error path. Similarly register_shrinker > error path is not handled. > > While it is unlikely to trigger these error path, it is not impossible > especially the later might fail with large NUMAs. Let's handle the > failure to make the code more robust. > > Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > Noticed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > index 4db6e8d780f6..4c6e86d861fd 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > @@ -1815,22 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg( > btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev; > > if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev)) > - goto error; > + goto error_free; > > if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) > - goto error; > + goto error_free; > > if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) > - goto error; > + goto error_lru; > > btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count; > btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan; > btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; > btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; > - register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); > + if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) > + goto error_pcpu; > return btp; > > -error: > +error_pcpu: > + percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); > +error_lru: > + list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); > +error_free: > kmem_free(btp); > return NULL; This part looks ok, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > } > -- > 2.15.0 > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote: [...] > > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling > > > > percpu_counter_init failure path doesn't clean up &btp->bt_lru list. > > Call list_lru_destroy in that error path. Similarly register_shrinker > > error path is not handled. > > > > While it is unlikely to trigger these error path, it is not impossible > > especially the later might fail with large NUMAs. Let's handle the > > failure to make the code more robust. > > > > Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > > Noticed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > --- > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > index 4db6e8d780f6..4c6e86d861fd 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > @@ -1815,22 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg( > > btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev; > > > > if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev)) > > - goto error; > > + goto error_free; > > > > if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) > > - goto error; > > + goto error_free; > > > > if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) > > - goto error; > > + goto error_lru; > > > > btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count; > > btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan; > > btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; > > btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; > > - register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); > > + if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) > > + goto error_pcpu; > > return btp; > > > > -error: > > +error_pcpu: > > + percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); > > +error_lru: > > + list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); > > +error_free: > > kmem_free(btp); > > return NULL; > > This part looks ok, > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Are you going to apply the patch or should I re-send it with acks/reviewed-by?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > [...] > > > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100 > > > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling > > > > > > percpu_counter_init failure path doesn't clean up &btp->bt_lru list. > > > Call list_lru_destroy in that error path. Similarly register_shrinker > > > error path is not handled. > > > > > > While it is unlikely to trigger these error path, it is not impossible > > > especially the later might fail with large NUMAs. Let's handle the > > > failure to make the code more robust. > > > > > > Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > > > Noticed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > > --- > > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > index 4db6e8d780f6..4c6e86d861fd 100644 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > > > @@ -1815,22 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg( > > > btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev; > > > > > > if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_free; > > > > > > if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_free; > > > > > > if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_lru; > > > > > > btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; > > > btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; > > > - register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); > > > + if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) > > > + goto error_pcpu; > > > return btp; > > > > > > -error: > > > +error_pcpu: > > > + percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); > > > +error_lru: > > > + list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); > > > +error_free: > > > kmem_free(btp); > > > return NULL; > > > > This part looks ok, > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > Are you going to apply the patch or should I re-send it with > acks/reviewed-by? I injected all of those when I added the patch to my tree: Noticed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> --D > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue 28-11-17 08:39:19, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Are you going to apply the patch or should I re-send it with > > acks/reviewed-by? > > I injected all of those when I added the patch to my tree: > > Noticed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Thanks!
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 4db6e8d780f6..4c6e86d861fd 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -1815,22 +1815,27 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg( btp->bt_daxdev = dax_dev; if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev)) - goto error; + goto error_free; if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru)) - goto error; + goto error_free; if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) - goto error; + goto error_lru; btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count; btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan; btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; - register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); + if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker)) + goto error_pcpu; return btp; -error: +error_pcpu: + percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); +error_lru: + list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); +error_free: kmem_free(btp); return NULL; }