Message ID | 20181121032327.8434-8-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | block: support multi-page bvec | expand |
Btw, given that this is the last user of bvec_last_segment after my other patches I think we should kill bvec_last_segment and do something like this here: diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index fa37ad52e962..af5e135d2b83 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -2981,6 +2981,14 @@ static void end_bio_bh_io_sync(struct bio *bio) bio_put(bio); } +static void zero_trailing_sectors(struct bio_vec *bvec, unsigned bytes) +{ + unsigned last_page = (bvec->bv_offset + bvec->bv_len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + + zero_user(nth_page(bvec->bv_page, last_page), + bvec->bv_offset % PAGE_SIZE + bvec->bv_len, bytes); +} + /* * This allows us to do IO even on the odd last sectors * of a device, even if the block size is some multiple @@ -3031,13 +3039,8 @@ void guard_bio_eod(int op, struct bio *bio) bvec->bv_len -= truncated_bytes; /* ..and clear the end of the buffer for reads */ - if (op == REQ_OP_READ) { - struct bio_vec bv; - - bvec_last_segment(bvec, &bv); - zero_user(bv.bv_page, bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len, - truncated_bytes); - } + if (op == REQ_OP_READ) + zero_trailing_sectors(bvec, truncated_bytes); } static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op_flags, struct buffer_head *bh,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:58:49AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Btw, given that this is the last user of bvec_last_segment after my > other patches I think we should kill bvec_last_segment and do something > like this here: > > > diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c > index fa37ad52e962..af5e135d2b83 100644 > --- a/fs/buffer.c > +++ b/fs/buffer.c > @@ -2981,6 +2981,14 @@ static void end_bio_bh_io_sync(struct bio *bio) > bio_put(bio); > } > > +static void zero_trailing_sectors(struct bio_vec *bvec, unsigned bytes) > +{ > + unsigned last_page = (bvec->bv_offset + bvec->bv_len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + zero_user(nth_page(bvec->bv_page, last_page), > + bvec->bv_offset % PAGE_SIZE + bvec->bv_len, bytes); > +} The above 'start' parameter is figured out as wrong, and the computation isn't very obvious, so I'd suggest to keep bvec_last_segment(). Thanks, Ming
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index 1286c2b95498..fa37ad52e962 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -3032,7 +3032,10 @@ void guard_bio_eod(int op, struct bio *bio) /* ..and clear the end of the buffer for reads */ if (op == REQ_OP_READ) { - zero_user(bvec->bv_page, bvec->bv_offset + bvec->bv_len, + struct bio_vec bv; + + bvec_last_segment(bvec, &bv); + zero_user(bv.bv_page, bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len, truncated_bytes); } }