diff mbox series

[13/20] xfs: merge xfs_efd_init into xfs_trans_get_efd

Message ID 20190517073119.30178-14-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [01/20] xfs: fix a trivial comment typo in the xfs_trans_committed_bulk | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig May 17, 2019, 7:31 a.m. UTC
There is no good reason to keep these two functions separate.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h  |  2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c | 26 --------------------------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Comments

Nikolay Borisov May 17, 2019, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On 17.05.19 г. 10:31 ч., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to keep these two functions separate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h  |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c | 26 --------------------------
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> index bb0b1e942d00..ccf95cb8234c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> @@ -312,32 +312,35 @@ static const struct xfs_item_ops xfs_efd_item_ops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * Allocate and initialize an efd item with the given number of extents.
> + * Allocate an "extent free done" log item that will hold nextents worth of
> + * extents.  The caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
> + * flexible about this at all.
>   */
>  struct xfs_efd_log_item *
> -xfs_efd_init(
> -	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> -	struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
> -	uint			nextents)
> -
> +xfs_trans_get_efd(
> +	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> +	struct xfs_efi_log_item		*efip,
> +	unsigned int			nextents)
>  {
> -	struct xfs_efd_log_item	*efdp;
> -	uint			size;
> +	struct xfs_efd_log_item		*efdp;
>  
>  	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
> +
>  	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
> -		size = (uint)(sizeof(xfs_efd_log_item_t) +
> -			((nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t)));
> -		efdp = kmem_zalloc(size, KM_SLEEP);
> +		efdp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
> +				(nextents - 1) * sizeof(struct xfs_extent),
> +				KM_SLEEP);

xfs_efd_log is really a struct which ends with an array. I think it will
make it slightly more obvious if you use the newly introduced
struct_size like so:

kmem_zalloc(struct_size(efdp, efd_format.efd_extents, nextents -1),
KM_SLEEP)


<snip>
Christoph Hellwig May 17, 2019, 8:27 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:16:52AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> xfs_efd_log is really a struct which ends with an array. I think it will
> make it slightly more obvious if you use the newly introduced
> struct_size like so:
> 
> kmem_zalloc(struct_size(efdp, efd_format.efd_extents, nextents -1),
> KM_SLEEP)

If we do that we should also kill the fake first entry in the array
and make it a C99 flexible array.  But that should be done in a separate
patch.
Eric Sandeen May 17, 2019, 6:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On 5/17/19 2:31 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to keep these two functions separate.

hm, do the thin ->create_done() wrappers make sense either?

/* Get an EFD so we can process all the free extents. */
STATIC void *
xfs_extent_free_create_done(
        struct xfs_trans                *tp,
        void                            *intent,
        unsigned int                    count)
{
        return xfs_trans_get_efd(tp, intent, count);
}

should we just hook xfs_trans_get_FOO() directly to ->create_done?

 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h  |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c | 26 --------------------------
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> index bb0b1e942d00..ccf95cb8234c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> @@ -312,32 +312,35 @@ static const struct xfs_item_ops xfs_efd_item_ops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * Allocate and initialize an efd item with the given number of extents.
> + * Allocate an "extent free done" log item that will hold nextents worth of
> + * extents.  The caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
> + * flexible about this at all.
>   */
>  struct xfs_efd_log_item *
> -xfs_efd_init(
> -	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> -	struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
> -	uint			nextents)
> -
> +xfs_trans_get_efd(
> +	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> +	struct xfs_efi_log_item		*efip,
> +	unsigned int			nextents)
>  {
> -	struct xfs_efd_log_item	*efdp;
> -	uint			size;
> +	struct xfs_efd_log_item		*efdp;
>  
>  	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
> +
>  	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
> -		size = (uint)(sizeof(xfs_efd_log_item_t) +
> -			((nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t)));
> -		efdp = kmem_zalloc(size, KM_SLEEP);
> +		efdp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
> +				(nextents - 1) * sizeof(struct xfs_extent),
> +				KM_SLEEP);
>  	} else {
>  		efdp = kmem_zone_zalloc(xfs_efd_zone, KM_SLEEP);
>  	}
>  
> -	xfs_log_item_init(mp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD, &xfs_efd_item_ops);
> +	xfs_log_item_init(tp->t_mountp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD,
> +			  &xfs_efd_item_ops);
>  	efdp->efd_efip = efip;
>  	efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents = nextents;
>  	efdp->efd_format.efd_efi_id = efip->efi_format.efi_id;
>  
> +	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
>  	return efdp;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> index b0dc4ebe8892..16aaab06d4ec 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> @@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efi_zone;
>  extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efd_zone;
>  
>  xfs_efi_log_item_t	*xfs_efi_init(struct xfs_mount *, uint);
> -xfs_efd_log_item_t	*xfs_efd_init(struct xfs_mount *, xfs_efi_log_item_t *,
> -				      uint);
>  int			xfs_efi_copy_format(xfs_log_iovec_t *buf,
>  					    xfs_efi_log_format_t *dst_efi_fmt);
>  void			xfs_efi_item_free(xfs_efi_log_item_t *);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> index 8ee7a3f8bb20..20ab1c9d758f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> @@ -19,32 +19,6 @@
>  #include "xfs_bmap.h"
>  #include "xfs_trace.h"
>  
> -/*
> - * This routine is called to allocate an "extent free done"
> - * log item that will hold nextents worth of extents.  The
> - * caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
> - * flexible about this at all.
> - */
> -struct xfs_efd_log_item *
> -xfs_trans_get_efd(struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> -		  struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
> -		  uint				nextents)
> -{
> -	struct xfs_efd_log_item			*efdp;
> -
> -	ASSERT(tp != NULL);
> -	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
> -
> -	efdp = xfs_efd_init(tp->t_mountp, efip, nextents);
> -	ASSERT(efdp != NULL);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Get a log_item_desc to point at the new item.
> -	 */
> -	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
> -	return efdp;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Free an extent and log it to the EFD. Note that the transaction is marked
>   * dirty regardless of whether the extent free succeeds or fails to support the
>
Christoph Hellwig May 20, 2019, 6:03 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:26:59PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> On 5/17/19 2:31 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > There is no good reason to keep these two functions separate.
> 
> hm, do the thin ->create_done() wrappers make sense either?
> 
> /* Get an EFD so we can process all the free extents. */
> STATIC void *
> xfs_extent_free_create_done(
>         struct xfs_trans                *tp,
>         void                            *intent,
>         unsigned int                    count)
> {
>         return xfs_trans_get_efd(tp, intent, count);
> }
> 
> should we just hook xfs_trans_get_FOO() directly to ->create_done?

Well, we have another callers of those in the log recovery code.

I have some ideas how to clean some of this up, but that is too much
for this series.
Brian Foster May 20, 2019, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:31:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to keep these two functions separate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Looks good, and there's only one more user of the xfs_efd_log_item_t
typedef. ;)

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h  |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c | 26 --------------------------
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> index bb0b1e942d00..ccf95cb8234c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> @@ -312,32 +312,35 @@ static const struct xfs_item_ops xfs_efd_item_ops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * Allocate and initialize an efd item with the given number of extents.
> + * Allocate an "extent free done" log item that will hold nextents worth of
> + * extents.  The caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
> + * flexible about this at all.
>   */
>  struct xfs_efd_log_item *
> -xfs_efd_init(
> -	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> -	struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
> -	uint			nextents)
> -
> +xfs_trans_get_efd(
> +	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> +	struct xfs_efi_log_item		*efip,
> +	unsigned int			nextents)
>  {
> -	struct xfs_efd_log_item	*efdp;
> -	uint			size;
> +	struct xfs_efd_log_item		*efdp;
>  
>  	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
> +
>  	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
> -		size = (uint)(sizeof(xfs_efd_log_item_t) +
> -			((nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t)));
> -		efdp = kmem_zalloc(size, KM_SLEEP);
> +		efdp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
> +				(nextents - 1) * sizeof(struct xfs_extent),
> +				KM_SLEEP);
>  	} else {
>  		efdp = kmem_zone_zalloc(xfs_efd_zone, KM_SLEEP);
>  	}
>  
> -	xfs_log_item_init(mp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD, &xfs_efd_item_ops);
> +	xfs_log_item_init(tp->t_mountp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD,
> +			  &xfs_efd_item_ops);
>  	efdp->efd_efip = efip;
>  	efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents = nextents;
>  	efdp->efd_format.efd_efi_id = efip->efi_format.efi_id;
>  
> +	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
>  	return efdp;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> index b0dc4ebe8892..16aaab06d4ec 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> @@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efi_zone;
>  extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efd_zone;
>  
>  xfs_efi_log_item_t	*xfs_efi_init(struct xfs_mount *, uint);
> -xfs_efd_log_item_t	*xfs_efd_init(struct xfs_mount *, xfs_efi_log_item_t *,
> -				      uint);
>  int			xfs_efi_copy_format(xfs_log_iovec_t *buf,
>  					    xfs_efi_log_format_t *dst_efi_fmt);
>  void			xfs_efi_item_free(xfs_efi_log_item_t *);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> index 8ee7a3f8bb20..20ab1c9d758f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
> @@ -19,32 +19,6 @@
>  #include "xfs_bmap.h"
>  #include "xfs_trace.h"
>  
> -/*
> - * This routine is called to allocate an "extent free done"
> - * log item that will hold nextents worth of extents.  The
> - * caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
> - * flexible about this at all.
> - */
> -struct xfs_efd_log_item *
> -xfs_trans_get_efd(struct xfs_trans		*tp,
> -		  struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
> -		  uint				nextents)
> -{
> -	struct xfs_efd_log_item			*efdp;
> -
> -	ASSERT(tp != NULL);
> -	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
> -
> -	efdp = xfs_efd_init(tp->t_mountp, efip, nextents);
> -	ASSERT(efdp != NULL);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Get a log_item_desc to point at the new item.
> -	 */
> -	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
> -	return efdp;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Free an extent and log it to the EFD. Note that the transaction is marked
>   * dirty regardless of whether the extent free succeeds or fails to support the
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
index bb0b1e942d00..ccf95cb8234c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
@@ -312,32 +312,35 @@  static const struct xfs_item_ops xfs_efd_item_ops = {
 };
 
 /*
- * Allocate and initialize an efd item with the given number of extents.
+ * Allocate an "extent free done" log item that will hold nextents worth of
+ * extents.  The caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
+ * flexible about this at all.
  */
 struct xfs_efd_log_item *
-xfs_efd_init(
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
-	struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
-	uint			nextents)
-
+xfs_trans_get_efd(
+	struct xfs_trans		*tp,
+	struct xfs_efi_log_item		*efip,
+	unsigned int			nextents)
 {
-	struct xfs_efd_log_item	*efdp;
-	uint			size;
+	struct xfs_efd_log_item		*efdp;
 
 	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
+
 	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
-		size = (uint)(sizeof(xfs_efd_log_item_t) +
-			((nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t)));
-		efdp = kmem_zalloc(size, KM_SLEEP);
+		efdp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
+				(nextents - 1) * sizeof(struct xfs_extent),
+				KM_SLEEP);
 	} else {
 		efdp = kmem_zone_zalloc(xfs_efd_zone, KM_SLEEP);
 	}
 
-	xfs_log_item_init(mp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD, &xfs_efd_item_ops);
+	xfs_log_item_init(tp->t_mountp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD,
+			  &xfs_efd_item_ops);
 	efdp->efd_efip = efip;
 	efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents = nextents;
 	efdp->efd_format.efd_efi_id = efip->efi_format.efi_id;
 
+	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
 	return efdp;
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
index b0dc4ebe8892..16aaab06d4ec 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
@@ -79,8 +79,6 @@  extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efi_zone;
 extern struct kmem_zone	*xfs_efd_zone;
 
 xfs_efi_log_item_t	*xfs_efi_init(struct xfs_mount *, uint);
-xfs_efd_log_item_t	*xfs_efd_init(struct xfs_mount *, xfs_efi_log_item_t *,
-				      uint);
 int			xfs_efi_copy_format(xfs_log_iovec_t *buf,
 					    xfs_efi_log_format_t *dst_efi_fmt);
 void			xfs_efi_item_free(xfs_efi_log_item_t *);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
index 8ee7a3f8bb20..20ab1c9d758f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_extfree.c
@@ -19,32 +19,6 @@ 
 #include "xfs_bmap.h"
 #include "xfs_trace.h"
 
-/*
- * This routine is called to allocate an "extent free done"
- * log item that will hold nextents worth of extents.  The
- * caller must use all nextents extents, because we are not
- * flexible about this at all.
- */
-struct xfs_efd_log_item *
-xfs_trans_get_efd(struct xfs_trans		*tp,
-		  struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip,
-		  uint				nextents)
-{
-	struct xfs_efd_log_item			*efdp;
-
-	ASSERT(tp != NULL);
-	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
-
-	efdp = xfs_efd_init(tp->t_mountp, efip, nextents);
-	ASSERT(efdp != NULL);
-
-	/*
-	 * Get a log_item_desc to point at the new item.
-	 */
-	xfs_trans_add_item(tp, &efdp->efd_item);
-	return efdp;
-}
-
 /*
  * Free an extent and log it to the EFD. Note that the transaction is marked
  * dirty regardless of whether the extent free succeeds or fails to support the