diff mbox series

[V2,2/2] xfs: Check if rt summary/bitmap buffers are logged with correct xfs_buf type

Message ID 20200916053407.2036-2-chandanrlinux@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/2] xfs: Add realtime group | expand

Commit Message

Chandan Babu R Sept. 16, 2020, 5:34 a.m. UTC 
This commit adds a test to check if growing a real-time device can end
up logging an xfs_buf with the "type" subfield of
bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF. When this
occurs the following call trace is printed on the console,

XFS: Assertion failed: (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 331
Call Trace:
 xfs_buf_item_format+0x632/0x680
 ? kmem_alloc_large+0x29/0x90
 ? kmem_alloc+0x70/0x120
 ? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x132/0x940
 xfs_log_commit_cil+0x26f/0x940
 ? xfs_buf_item_init+0x1ad/0x240
 ? xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
 __xfs_trans_commit+0xac/0x370
 xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
 xfs_growfs_rt+0x1a0/0x5e0
 xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0xc70
 ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x174/0x220
 ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
 do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x70
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag when growing summary/bitmap
files" is required to fix this issue.

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
---
 tests/xfs/260     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/xfs/260.out |  2 ++
 tests/xfs/group   |  1 +
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/xfs/260
 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/260.out

Comments

Chandan Babu R Sept. 16, 2020, 1:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wednesday 16 September 2020 11:04:07 AM IST Chandan Babu R wrote:
> This commit adds a test to check if growing a real-time device can end
> up logging an xfs_buf with the "type" subfield of
> bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF. When this
> occurs the following call trace is printed on the console,
> 
> XFS: Assertion failed: (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 331
> Call Trace:
>  xfs_buf_item_format+0x632/0x680
>  ? kmem_alloc_large+0x29/0x90
>  ? kmem_alloc+0x70/0x120
>  ? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x132/0x940
>  xfs_log_commit_cil+0x26f/0x940
>  ? xfs_buf_item_init+0x1ad/0x240
>  ? xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
>  __xfs_trans_commit+0xac/0x370
>  xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
>  xfs_growfs_rt+0x1a0/0x5e0
>  xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0xc70
>  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x174/0x220
>  ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
>  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>  do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x70
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> The kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag when growing summary/bitmap
> files" is required to fix this issue.
>

Eryu,

Sorry, I forgot to add Darrick's RVB tag. Please let me know if I have to
resend the patch with the missing RVB.

> Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Darrick J. Wong Sept. 16, 2020, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:04:07AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> This commit adds a test to check if growing a real-time device can end
> up logging an xfs_buf with the "type" subfield of
> bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF. When this
> occurs the following call trace is printed on the console,
> 
> XFS: Assertion failed: (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 331
> Call Trace:
>  xfs_buf_item_format+0x632/0x680
>  ? kmem_alloc_large+0x29/0x90
>  ? kmem_alloc+0x70/0x120
>  ? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x132/0x940
>  xfs_log_commit_cil+0x26f/0x940
>  ? xfs_buf_item_init+0x1ad/0x240
>  ? xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
>  __xfs_trans_commit+0xac/0x370
>  xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
>  xfs_growfs_rt+0x1a0/0x5e0
>  xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0xc70
>  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x174/0x220
>  ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
>  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>  do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x70
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> The kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag when growing summary/bitmap
> files" is required to fix this issue.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/260     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/260.out |  2 ++
>  tests/xfs/group   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/260
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/260.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/260 b/tests/xfs/260
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..078d4a11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/260
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Chandan Babu R.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 260
> +#
> +# Test to check if growing a real-time device can end up logging an xfs_buf with
> +# the "type" subfield of bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to
> +# XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF.
> +#
> +# This is a regression test for the kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag
> +# when growing summary/bitmap files".
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_realtime
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs -r size=10M  >> $seqres.full
> +
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +$XFS_GROWFS_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> +
> +_scratch_unmount

Is this unmount crucial to exposing the bug?  Or does this post-test
unmount and fsck suffice?

(The rest of the logic looks ok to me.)

--D

> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/260.out b/tests/xfs/260.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..18ca517c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/260.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 260
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> index 3bb0f674..a3f5c81a 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@
>  257 auto quick clone
>  258 auto quick clone
>  259 auto quick
> +260 auto quick growfs realtime
>  261 auto quick quota
>  262 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
>  263 auto quick quota
> -- 
> 2.28.0
>
Chandan Babu R Sept. 17, 2020, 3:50 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Wednesday 16 September 2020 10:23:33 PM IST Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:04:07AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> > This commit adds a test to check if growing a real-time device can end
> > up logging an xfs_buf with the "type" subfield of
> > bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF. When this
> > occurs the following call trace is printed on the console,
> > 
> > XFS: Assertion failed: (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 331
> > Call Trace:
> >  xfs_buf_item_format+0x632/0x680
> >  ? kmem_alloc_large+0x29/0x90
> >  ? kmem_alloc+0x70/0x120
> >  ? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x132/0x940
> >  xfs_log_commit_cil+0x26f/0x940
> >  ? xfs_buf_item_init+0x1ad/0x240
> >  ? xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
> >  __xfs_trans_commit+0xac/0x370
> >  xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
> >  xfs_growfs_rt+0x1a0/0x5e0
> >  xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0xc70
> >  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x174/0x220
> >  ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
> >  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> >  do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x70
> >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > 
> > The kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag when growing summary/bitmap
> > files" is required to fix this issue.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/260     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/xfs/260.out |  2 ++
> >  tests/xfs/group   |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/260
> >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/260.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/260 b/tests/xfs/260
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..078d4a11
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/260
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2020 Chandan Babu R.  All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 260
> > +#
> > +# Test to check if growing a real-time device can end up logging an xfs_buf with
> > +# the "type" subfield of bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to
> > +# XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF.
> > +#
> > +# This is a regression test for the kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag
> > +# when growing summary/bitmap files".
> > +
> > +seq=`basename $0`
> > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > +
> > +here=`pwd`
> > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > +status=1	# failure is the default!
> > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > +	cd /
> > +	rm -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > +. ./common/rc
> > +. ./common/filter
> > +
> > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +_supported_os Linux
> > +_require_realtime
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs -r size=10M  >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +$XFS_GROWFS_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +_scratch_unmount
> 
> Is this unmount crucial to exposing the bug?  Or does this post-test
> unmount and fsck suffice?

No, the above call to _scratch_unmount isn't required for recreating the
bug. I will remove it and post the patch once again.

> 
> (The rest of the logic looks ok to me.)
> 
> --D
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tests/xfs/260 b/tests/xfs/260
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..078d4a11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/260
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ 
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2020 Chandan Babu R.  All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test 260
+#
+# Test to check if growing a real-time device can end up logging an xfs_buf with
+# the "type" subfield of bip->bli_formats->blf_flags set to
+# XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF.
+#
+# This is a regression test for the kernel patch "xfs: Set xfs_buf type flag
+# when growing summary/bitmap files".
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1	# failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+	cd /
+	rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+
+# remove previous $seqres.full before test
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs xfs
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_realtime
+
+_scratch_mkfs -r size=10M  >> $seqres.full
+
+_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
+
+$XFS_GROWFS_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
+
+_scratch_unmount
+
+echo "Silence is golden"
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/260.out b/tests/xfs/260.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..18ca517c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/260.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ 
+QA output created by 260
+Silence is golden
diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
index 3bb0f674..a3f5c81a 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/group
+++ b/tests/xfs/group
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ 
 257 auto quick clone
 258 auto quick clone
 259 auto quick
+260 auto quick growfs realtime
 261 auto quick quota
 262 dangerous_fuzzers dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
 263 auto quick quota