| Message ID | 20210125171414.41ed957a@canb.auug.org.au (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the xfs tree | expand |
Hi all, On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > between commit: > > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") > > from the xfs tree and commit: > > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") > > from the pidfd tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid; > > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) { > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid; > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode)) > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID; > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) && > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) { > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > + inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid; > + inode->i_mode = mode; > } else { > - inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode); > - inode->i_gid = fsgid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > ++ inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode); > } > > /*
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:24:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") > > > > from the xfs tree and commit: > > > > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") > > > > from the pidfd tree. > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > complex conflicts. > > > > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode > > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid; > > > > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) { > > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid; > > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode)) > > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID; > > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) && > > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) { > > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); > > Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with > inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); I think that looks good, though Mr. Brauner is probably better equipped to tell if that change is correct. (He says watching kernel.org mail take nearly a day to come through...) --D > > > + inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid; > > + inode->i_mode = mode; > > } else { > > - inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode); > > - inode->i_gid = fsgid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > ++ inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode); > > } > > > > /* > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 07:11:15PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:24:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > > > > between commit: > > > > > > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") > > > > > > from the xfs tree and commit: > > > > > > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") > > > > > > from the pidfd tree. > > > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > > complex conflicts. > > > > > > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode > > > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > > > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid; > > > > > > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) { > > > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid; > > > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode)) > > > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID; > > > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) && > > > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) { > > > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); > > > > Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with > > inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > I think that looks good, though Mr. Brauner is probably better equipped > to tell if that change is correct. This is on top of the setgid fixup. Yes, this looks good! :) I think what I'll do is to simply build -next for every release up until the merge window and run the xfstests I added on the kernel. That should reveal regressions very quickly. > > (He says watching kernel.org mail take nearly a day to come through...) Yeah, it had crazy delays (> 1 day). I chased down a few missing mails from yesterday. Jon took that opportunity to make vger behave a little better I believe, so delivery should be faster today, hopefully. Christian
Hi all, On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:24:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") > > > > from the xfs tree and commit: > > > > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") > > > > from the pidfd tree. > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > complex conflicts. > > > > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode > > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid; > > > > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) { > > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid; > > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode)) > > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID; > > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) && > > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) { > > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); > > Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with > inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > > + inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid; > > + inode->i_mode = mode; > > } else { > > - inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode); > > - inode->i_gid = fsgid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > ++ inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode); > > } > > > > /* With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this conflict still exists.
Hi all, On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:42:43 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:24:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > > > > between commit: > > > > > > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") > > > > > > from the xfs tree and commit: > > > > > > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") > > > > > > from the pidfd tree. > > > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > > complex conflicts. > > > > > > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > > > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode > > > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > > > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid; > > > > > > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) { > > > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid; > > > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode)) > > > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID; > > > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) && > > > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) { > > > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); > > > > Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with > > inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > > > > + inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid; > > > + inode->i_mode = mode; > > > } else { > > > - inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode); > > > - inode->i_gid = fsgid_into_mnt(mnt_userns); > > > ++ inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode); > > > } > > > > > > /* > > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this > conflict still exists. This is now a conflict between the pidfd tree and Linus' tree.
diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c between commit: 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories") from the xfs tree and commit: f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts") from the pidfd tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.