diff mbox series

[06/42] xfs: don't assert fail on transaction cancel with deferred ops

Message ID 20230118224505.1964941-7-david@fromorbit.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series xfs: per-ag centric allocation alogrithms | expand

Commit Message

Dave Chinner Jan. 18, 2023, 10:44 p.m. UTC
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

We can error out of an allocation transaction when updating BMBT
blocks when things go wrong. This can be a btree corruption, and
unexpected ENOSPC, etc. In these cases, we already have deferred ops
queued for the first allocation that has been done, and we just want
to cancel out the transaction and shut down the filesystem on error.

In fact, we do just that for production systems - the assert that we
can't have a transaction with defer ops attached unless we are
already shut down is bogus and gets in the way of debugging
whatever issue is actually causing the transaction to be cancelled.

Remove the assert because it is causing spurious test failures to
hang test machines.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Allison Henderson Jan. 19, 2023, 10:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 09:44 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> We can error out of an allocation transaction when updating BMBT
> blocks when things go wrong. This can be a btree corruption, and
> unexpected ENOSPC, etc. In these cases, we already have deferred ops
> queued for the first allocation that has been done, and we just want
> to cancel out the transaction and shut down the filesystem on error.
> 
> In fact, we do just that for production systems - the assert that we
> can't have a transaction with defer ops attached unless we are
> already shut down is bogus and gets in the way of debugging
> whatever issue is actually causing the transaction to be cancelled.
> 
> Remove the assert because it is causing spurious test failures to
> hang test machines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Ok, makes sense
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 53ab544e4c2c..8afc0c080861 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -1078,10 +1078,10 @@ xfs_trans_cancel(
>         /*
>          * It's never valid to cancel a transaction with deferred ops
> attached,
>          * because the transaction is effectively dirty.  Complain
> about this
> -        * loudly before freeing the in-memory defer items.
> +        * loudly before freeing the in-memory defer items and
> shutting down the
> +        * filesystem.
>          */
>         if (!list_empty(&tp->t_dfops)) {
> -               ASSERT(xfs_is_shutdown(mp) || list_empty(&tp-
> >t_dfops));
>                 ASSERT(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES);
>                 dirty = true;
>                 xfs_defer_cancel(tp);
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 53ab544e4c2c..8afc0c080861 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -1078,10 +1078,10 @@  xfs_trans_cancel(
 	/*
 	 * It's never valid to cancel a transaction with deferred ops attached,
 	 * because the transaction is effectively dirty.  Complain about this
-	 * loudly before freeing the in-memory defer items.
+	 * loudly before freeing the in-memory defer items and shutting down the
+	 * filesystem.
 	 */
 	if (!list_empty(&tp->t_dfops)) {
-		ASSERT(xfs_is_shutdown(mp) || list_empty(&tp->t_dfops));
 		ASSERT(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES);
 		dirty = true;
 		xfs_defer_cancel(tp);