From patchwork Thu Jun 22 08:53:30 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qi Zheng X-Patchwork-Id: 13288744 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F13EB64D8 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231883AbjFVJEZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:04:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48766 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231682AbjFVJDo (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:03:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667F744BD for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 01:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b5466bc5f8so9657445ad.1 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 01:57:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1687424235; x=1690016235; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WJL0OVu56Nd2o0mxjMzDLbJ1YgOSFE+1vh1fraMJRQc=; b=ZL5KbVwmDDj8Gy97lbIJB7YMY8SjOouZdkJA02qk3b6DF+dyuydzFaZQylnxfC9S+S TSPs6tccznQsZMFsLcEJsyUCVw2T8A7tWiogG+8JrU9eTxXc/9BRSgGLnZUgk22umk+B SSngiAqdElEoARuVlyhvyt60KkFHlCbx7fUzwDo8HLyuhKs4MGrMo82qC5g6M3adQ/kW 5sTm4LvGQVeaef4Ot0YEMEqtMtR7HuPlighv8JjZTv9ZOAYC2jp2PBoT7dm2kyLjCYpo 2319G2aelwdOOipT4nDLl60x2b/otqGmO31pzkQB3PluAdANWpdqDdwlhTA0kEDJVKL2 ha0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687424235; x=1690016235; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WJL0OVu56Nd2o0mxjMzDLbJ1YgOSFE+1vh1fraMJRQc=; b=iksWFq+vZs1PeZgwAZRaGP5i0vQuAoSK9ZO/PrBSM3pz3ObhwxZFH0DcWmsSPV/Zfe whOqeBcsduToLO6xGvieQ1DYROz4wOZ1gqi0oduqUKGQ5S/+SGcLLhwAheDVbTMcvpir lwQyvqfyKue4D2WqyChd+u3yasTabqqnXCHgvRnS5y/a38rUQ9pUao6ruSIYDnk4JF3x dvVr8NrB9pyLB409fMZe6NN66YWXpO5KGB8jyv8MMrZWYV1K49QlnNl/olRGyoa5rts8 OsDkVsngq19qB1KYjnIZHdnkwxy05rKrX0FlYLvGiPSGcGv7mzp0KlbECXx9HAqLvDsr buxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzh8EXC4ESxdfrfWpDW7xotev+uVY+43cOzyfqWweQaSwqa4lyL soHGghhXekEaOWZtpl151OnbXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7SQ8rS1EvkM8z3rgy8xjUWZCKvjOIofntYWhPm+3TRoZDLL1AdCBUgXDGJA0nPgYbkXii2Dw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c945:b0:1ae:3ff8:7fa7 with SMTP id i5-20020a170902c94500b001ae3ff87fa7mr21702029pla.4.1687424235565; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02DW0BEMD6R.bytedance.net ([139.177.225.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h2-20020a170902f7c200b001b549fce345sm4806971plw.230.2023.06.22.01.57.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Qi Zheng To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: [PATCH 24/29] mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:53:30 +0800 Message-Id: <20230622085335.77010-25-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) In-Reply-To: <20230622085335.77010-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> References: <20230622085335.77010-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org The shrinker_rwsem is a global read-write lock in shrinkers subsystem, which protects most operations such as slab shrink, registration and unregistration of shrinkers, etc. This can easily cause problems in the following cases. 1) When the memory pressure is high and there are many filesystems mounted or unmounted at the same time, slab shrink will be affected (down_read_trylock() failed). Such as the real workload mentioned by Kirill Tkhai: ``` One of the real workloads from my experience is start of an overcommitted node containing many starting containers after node crash (or many resuming containers after reboot for kernel update). In these cases memory pressure is huge, and the node goes round in long reclaim. ``` 2) If a shrinker is blocked (such as the case mentioned in [1]) and a writer comes in (such as mount a fs), then this writer will be blocked and cause all subsequent shrinker-related operations to be blocked. Even if there is no competitor when shrinking slab, there may still be a problem. If we have a long shrinker list and we do not reclaim enough memory with each shrinker, then the down_read_trylock() may be called with high frequency. Because of the poor multicore scalability of atomic operations, this can lead to a significant drop in IPC (instructions per cycle). We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [1], but then kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [2], so we reverted it [3]. This commit uses the refcount+RCU method [4] proposed by by Dave Chinner to re-implement the lockless global slab shrink. The memcg slab shrink is handled in the subsequent patch. Currently, the shrinker instances can be divided into the following three types: a) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel, such as workingset_shadow_shrinker. b) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel modules, such as mmu_shrinker in x86. c) shrinker instance embedded in other structures. For case a, the memory of shrinker instance is never freed. For case b, the memory of shrinker instance will be freed after the module is unloaded. But we will call synchronize_rcu() in free_module() to wait for RCU read-side critical section to exit. For case c, the memory of shrinker instance will be dynamically freed by calling kfree_rcu(). So we can use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() to ensure that the shrinker instance is valid. The shrinker::refcount mechanism ensures that the shrinker instance will not be run again after unregistration. So the structure that records the pointer of shrinker instance can be safely freed without waiting for the RCU read-side critical section. In this way, while we implement the lockless slab shrink, we don't need to be blocked in unregister_shrinker() to wait RCU read-side critical section. The following are the test results: stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics-brief --ramfs 9 & 1) Before applying this patchset: setting to a 60 second run per stressor dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) ramfs 880623 60.02 7.71 226.93 14671.45 3753.09 ramfs: 1 System Management Interrupt for a 60.03s run time: 5762.40s available CPU time 7.71s user time ( 0.13%) 226.93s system time ( 3.94%) 234.64s total time ( 4.07%) load average: 8.54 3.06 2.11 passed: 9: ramfs (9) failed: 0 skipped: 0 successful run completed in 60.03s (1 min, 0.03 secs) 2) After applying this patchset: setting to a 60 second run per stressor dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) ramfs 847562 60.02 7.44 230.22 14120.66 3566.23 ramfs: 4 System Management Interrupts for a 60.12s run time: 5771.95s available CPU time 7.44s user time ( 0.13%) 230.22s system time ( 3.99%) 237.66s total time ( 4.12%) load average: 8.18 2.43 0.84 passed: 9: ramfs (9) failed: 0 skipped: 0 successful run completed in 60.12s (1 min, 0.12 secs) We can see that the ops/s has hardly changed. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313112819.38938-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/ [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/ [3]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev/ [4]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/ Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng --- include/linux/shrinker.h | 6 ++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h index 7bfeb2f25246..b0c6c2df9db8 100644 --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct shrinker { refcount_t refcount; struct completion completion_wait; + struct rcu_head rcu; void *private_data; @@ -123,6 +124,11 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc_and_init(count_objects_cb count, void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker); void unregister_and_free_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker); +static inline bool shrinker_try_get(struct shrinker *shrinker) +{ + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&shrinker->refcount); +} + static inline void shrinker_put(struct shrinker *shrinker) { if (refcount_dec_and_test(&shrinker->refcount)) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 6f9c4750effa..767569698946 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -742,7 +743,7 @@ void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker) down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); refcount_set(&shrinker->refcount, 1); init_completion(&shrinker->completion_wait); - list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); + list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED; shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker); up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); @@ -800,7 +801,7 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) wait_for_completion(&shrinker->completion_wait); down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); - list_del(&shrinker->list); + list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list); shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED; if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker); @@ -845,7 +846,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrinker_free); void unregister_and_free_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) { unregister_shrinker(shrinker); - kfree(shrinker); + kfree_rcu(shrinker, rcu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_and_free_shrinker); @@ -1067,33 +1068,27 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority); - if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem)) - goto out; - - list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) { + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) { struct shrink_control sc = { .gfp_mask = gfp_mask, .nid = nid, .memcg = memcg, }; + if (!shrinker_try_get(shrinker)) + continue; + rcu_read_unlock(); + ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority); if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) ret = 0; freed += ret; - /* - * Bail out if someone want to register a new shrinker to - * prevent the registration from being stalled for long periods - * by parallel ongoing shrinking. - */ - if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) { - freed = freed ? : 1; - break; - } - } - up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); -out: + rcu_read_lock(); + shrinker_put(shrinker); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); cond_resched(); return freed; }