diff mbox series

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the xfs tree

Message ID 20230823093852.7bf03b7e@canb.auug.org.au (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the xfs tree | expand

Commit Message

Stephen Rothwell Aug. 22, 2023, 11:38 p.m. UTC
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c

between commit:

  a76dba3b248c ("xfs: create scaffolding for creating debugfs entries")

from the xfs tree and commit:

  35a93b148b03 ("xfs: close the external block devices in xfs_mount_free")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Comments

Darrick J. Wong Aug. 23, 2023, 4:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:38:52AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   a76dba3b248c ("xfs: create scaffolding for creating debugfs entries")
> 
> from the xfs tree and commit:
> 
>   35a93b148b03 ("xfs: close the external block devices in xfs_mount_free")
> 
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 09638e8fb4ee,c79eac048456..000000000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@@ -760,7 -772,17 +774,18 @@@ static voi
>   xfs_mount_free(
>   	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
>   {
> + 	/*
> + 	 * Free the buftargs here because blkdev_put needs to be called outside
> + 	 * of sb->s_umount, which is held around the call to ->put_super.
> + 	 */
> + 	if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp)
> + 		xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_logdev_targp);
> + 	if (mp->m_rtdev_targp)
> + 		xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_rtdev_targp);
> + 	if (mp->m_ddev_targp)
> + 		xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp);
> + 
>  +	debugfs_remove(mp->m_debugfs);
>   	kfree(mp->m_rtname);
>   	kfree(mp->m_logname);
>   	kmem_free(mp);
> @@@ -1538,18 -1537,11 +1556,18 @@@ xfs_fs_fill_super
>   
>   	error = xfs_open_devices(mp);
>   	if (error)
> - 		goto out_free_names;
> + 		return error;
>   
>  +	if (xfs_debugfs) {
>  +		mp->m_debugfs = xfs_debugfs_mkdir(mp->m_super->s_id,
>  +						  xfs_debugfs);
>  +	} else {
>  +		mp->m_debugfs = NULL;
>  +	}
>  +

Yep, this looks correct.

--D

>   	error = xfs_init_mount_workqueues(mp);
>   	if (error)
> - 		goto out_close_devices;
> + 		goto out_shutdown_devices;
>   
>   	error = xfs_init_percpu_counters(mp);
>   	if (error)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 09638e8fb4ee,c79eac048456..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c