@@ -15,31 +15,19 @@ static inline void iomap_iter_reset_iomap(struct iomap_iter *iter)
}
/*
- * Advance to the next range we need to map.
- *
- * If the iomap is marked IOMAP_F_STALE, it means the existing map was not fully
- * processed - it was aborted because the extent the iomap spanned may have been
- * changed during the operation. In this case, the iteration behaviour is to
- * remap the unprocessed range of the iter, and that means we may need to remap
- * even when we've made no progress (i.e. count = 0). Hence the "finished
- * iterating" case needs to distinguish between (count = 0) meaning we are done
- * and (count = 0 && stale) meaning we need to remap the entire remaining range.
+ * Advance the current iterator position and return the length remaining for the
+ * current mapping.
*/
-static inline int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, s64 count)
+s64 iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, s64 count)
{
- bool stale = iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE;
- int ret = 1;
-
if (count < 0)
return count;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count > iomap_length(iter)))
return -EIO;
iter->pos += count;
iter->len -= count;
- if (!iter->len || (!count && !stale))
- ret = 0;
- return ret;
+ return iomap_length(iter);
}
static inline void iomap_iter_done(struct iomap_iter *iter)
@@ -71,9 +59,15 @@ static inline void iomap_iter_done(struct iomap_iter *iter)
*/
int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
{
- int ret;
+ s64 ret;
+ bool stale = iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE;
- if (iter->iomap.length && ops->iomap_end) {
+ if (!iter->iomap.length) {
+ trace_iomap_iter(iter, ops, _RET_IP_);
+ goto begin;
+ }
+
+ if (ops->iomap_end) {
ret = ops->iomap_end(iter->inode, iter->pos, iomap_length(iter),
iter->processed > 0 ? iter->processed : 0,
iter->flags, &iter->iomap);
@@ -81,15 +75,25 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
return ret;
}
- /* advance and clear state from the previous iteration */
+ /*
+ * Advance the iter and clear state from the previous iteration. The
+ * remaining length of the previous iteration should be zero by this
+ * point, so use iter->len to determine whether to continue onto the
+ * next mapping. Explicitly terminate in the case where the current iter
+ * has not advanced at all (i.e. no work was done for some reason)
+ * unless the mapping has been marked stale and needs to be reprocessed.
+ */
trace_iomap_iter(iter, ops, _RET_IP_);
- if (iter->iomap.length) {
- ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter, iter->processed);
- iomap_iter_reset_iomap(iter);
- if (ret <= 0)
- return ret;
- }
+ ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter, iter->processed);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = iter->len;
+ if (ret > 0 && !iter->processed && !stale)
+ ret = 0;
+ iomap_iter_reset_iomap(iter);
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ return ret;
+begin:
ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
&iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct iomap_iter {
};
int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops);
+s64 iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, s64 count);
static inline u64 iomap_length_trim(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
u64 len)
In preparation for future changes and more generic use of iomap_iter_advance(), lift the high level iter continuation logic out of iomap_iter_advance() into the caller. Also add some comments and rework iomap_iter() to jump straight to ->iomap_begin() on the first iteration. Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> --- fs/iomap/iter.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/linux/iomap.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)