diff mbox series

[2/2] xfs: don't take addresses of packed xfs_rmap_key

Message ID 89743aba-ca7f-340c-c813-b8d73cb25cd7@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series xfs: don't take addresses of packed structures | expand

Commit Message

Eric Sandeen Jan. 29, 2020, 5:45 p.m. UTC
gcc now warns about taking an address of a packed structure member.

This happens here because of how be32_add_cpu() works; just open-code
the modification using a temporary variable instead.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---

Comments

Darrick J. Wong Jan. 29, 2020, 5:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:45:05AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> gcc now warns about taking an address of a packed structure member.
> 
> This happens here because of how be32_add_cpu() works; just open-code
> the modification using a temporary variable instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
> index fc78efa52c94..ad5ead62c992 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
> @@ -182,12 +182,14 @@ xfs_rmapbt_init_high_key_from_rec(
>  	union xfs_btree_rec	*rec)
>  {
>  	uint64_t		off;
> +	xfs_agblock_t		start;
>  	int			adj;
>  
>  	adj = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_blockcount) - 1;
>  
>  	key->rmap.rm_startblock = rec->rmap.rm_startblock;

I was gonna say to kill this statement since you set it again two lines
later, but then spotted a bug two lines down...

> -	be32_add_cpu(&key->rmap.rm_startblock, adj);
> +	start = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_startblock) - adj;
> +	rec->rmap.rm_startblock = cpu_to_be32(start);

...this should be setting key->rmap.rm_startblock.

--D

>  	key->rmap.rm_owner = rec->rmap.rm_owner;
>  	key->rmap.rm_offset = rec->rmap.rm_offset;
>  	if (XFS_RMAP_NON_INODE_OWNER(be64_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_owner)) ||
> 
>
Eric Sandeen Jan. 29, 2020, 6:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On 1/29/20 11:56 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:45:05AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> gcc now warns about taking an address of a packed structure member.
>>
>> This happens here because of how be32_add_cpu() works; just open-code
>> the modification using a temporary variable instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
>> index fc78efa52c94..ad5ead62c992 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
>> @@ -182,12 +182,14 @@ xfs_rmapbt_init_high_key_from_rec(
>>  	union xfs_btree_rec	*rec)
>>  {
>>  	uint64_t		off;
>> +	xfs_agblock_t		start;
>>  	int			adj;
>>  
>>  	adj = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_blockcount) - 1;
>>  
>>  	key->rmap.rm_startblock = rec->rmap.rm_startblock;
> 
> I was gonna say to kill this statement since you set it again two lines
> later, but then spotted a bug two lines down...
> 
>> -	be32_add_cpu(&key->rmap.rm_startblock, adj);
>> +	start = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_startblock) - adj;
>> +	rec->rmap.rm_startblock = cpu_to_be32(start);

/searches for that brown paper bag

thanks

-Eric
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
index fc78efa52c94..ad5ead62c992 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
@@ -182,12 +182,14 @@  xfs_rmapbt_init_high_key_from_rec(
 	union xfs_btree_rec	*rec)
 {
 	uint64_t		off;
+	xfs_agblock_t		start;
 	int			adj;
 
 	adj = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_blockcount) - 1;
 
 	key->rmap.rm_startblock = rec->rmap.rm_startblock;
-	be32_add_cpu(&key->rmap.rm_startblock, adj);
+	start = be32_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_startblock) - adj;
+	rec->rmap.rm_startblock = cpu_to_be32(start);
 	key->rmap.rm_owner = rec->rmap.rm_owner;
 	key->rmap.rm_offset = rec->rmap.rm_offset;
 	if (XFS_RMAP_NON_INODE_OWNER(be64_to_cpu(rec->rmap.rm_owner)) ||