From patchwork Mon Jun 10 17:26:06 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Amir Goldstein X-Patchwork-Id: 10985241 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D80313AD for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1660C1FFD9 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0A88C28724; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA1A1FFD9 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387773AbfFJR0S (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:26:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:46947 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387415AbfFJR0S (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:26:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id n4so9973611wrw.13; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:26:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=T2wOLlAZOy3qVuwvBdYnNU8FtvV+XZXW5B2+vkjvzz4=; b=gC3U/uassCcEoc68QCw7GSiYkAneEFa7J1H2dMA5k36Z2H99T8sFzyGqAntJVHBOm5 00OEsj68IwdLBaF9QndWlLM2ASJucU4pTMp98fSeuev4Rekvs1vebV8r8S7bbvq5Cu9E e8SbhDceZvQHD2Pazf8XZ9fLpdy6DpoeBgD9OCKZ7yiJ+7WLKYymJlcWNxIW4y3NY8iN o2/DRWzVEpPn+TOrWoPSvgMa+t0MR13t8afnqhBIkOFJg1CtLs8+1FRCzJKmmVimu8I3 zVmMNNDEcjDPnWtXm7QOMNxOMY9X6FCaGSiutrtNTsRlm1UAm1Pcu0u0spPI5KL/tF6P wxjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=T2wOLlAZOy3qVuwvBdYnNU8FtvV+XZXW5B2+vkjvzz4=; b=r10DsDbJ9Nz7iK1M9NkXWOju6W7pp64LqveiUI0/GOtAauSgfhN71Gq/5Qse7oMoxq AsQqnLoh5YGLm7Zq0ragwFgtYLpBWnm6xTL7YWrAuRWvie5Uv2hlt7mKhJWtWoG+ua59 WifIV4yEMkqAw0CyOEpvBlXNjxqd8W9IHc1XXCMugOU1RuH+yfdMg+2QvTP0H5vtT3A/ ulS7V0yyvGOhaPoxPu4xGklYmHYfoRPPzRu0oCIaI14jaOjzPnfMb6+uRuiMff8aDecx 5/gO4H7fkNR5ljkn3zF0hpcJ7TozJlCoX3yWGcBILe9r7l8MI21P6agCuyO7fdYsEy4U gdMw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfktCZ+TX95TR4y1Mc3MhZxpdtOCFdgTp9u0X/ChAKNsHb52YR wq80etUpwYmhgzyUNaEZwPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQAchO4xzDDFGFembG1wpHHtqDt0EBI1Uads7Uz0CM6SO0qeCbrz57U2YQ6cfCnMi2buFfEw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dd52:: with SMTP id u18mr7785778wrm.193.1560187575805; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([5.102.238.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10sm247626wmf.8.2019.06.10.10.26.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Amir Goldstein To: "Darrick J . Wong" Cc: Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Theodore Ts'o , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia , Luis Henriques , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] vfs: allow copy_file_range from a swapfile Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:26:06 +0300 Message-Id: <20190610172606.4119-1-amir73il@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP read(2) is allowed from a swapfile, so copy_file_range(2) should be allowed as well. Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o Fixes: 96e6e8f4a68d ("vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range") Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein --- Darrick, This fixes the generic/554 issue reported by Ted. I intend to remove the test case of copy from swap file from generic/554, so test is expected to pass with or without this fix. But if you wait for next week's xfstests update before applying this fix, then at lease maintainer that run current xfstests master could use current copy-file-range-fixes branch to pass the tests. Thanks, Amir. mm/filemap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index aac71aef4c61..f74e5ce7ca50 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode_out)) return -EPERM; - if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode_in) || IS_SWAPFILE(inode_out)) + if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode_out)) return -ETXTBSY; /* Ensure offsets don't wrap. */