From patchwork Wed Jun 19 08:49:45 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yan Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 11003707 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5083B112C for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1A128A2A for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2E6E428B59; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB47D28B7D for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdWJz-0002RC-HO for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 04:51:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdWJP-0001vC-Uw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 04:51:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdWJM-0004qO-L9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 04:51:23 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:10317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdWIm-0004Ry-HC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 04:51:18 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2019 01:50:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,392,1557212400"; d="scan'208";a="170503094" Received: from joy-desktop.sh.intel.com ([10.239.13.126]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2019 01:50:30 -0700 From: Yan Zhao To: pbonzini@redhat.com Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:49:45 +0800 Message-Id: <1560934185-14152-1-git-send-email-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.55.52.88 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: do not do out of bound notification X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yan Zhao , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP even if an entry overlaps with notifier's range, should not map/unmap out of bound part in the entry. This would cause problem in below case: 1. initially there are two notifiers with ranges 0-0xfedfffff, 0xfef00000-0xffffffffffffffff, IOVAs from 0x3c000000 - 0x3c1fffff is in shadow page table. 2. in vfio, memory_region_register_iommu_notifier() is followed by memory_region_iommu_replay(), which will first call address space unmap, and walk and add back all entries in vtd shadow page table. e.g. (1) for notifier 0-0xfedfffff, IOVAs from 0 - 0xffffffff get unmapped, and IOVAs from 0x3c000000 - 0x3c1fffff get mapped (2) for notifier 0xfef00000-0xffffffffffffffff IOVAs from 0 - 0x7fffffffff get unmapped, but IOVAs from 0x3c000000 - 0x3c1fffff cannot get mapped back. Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao --- memory.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c index 07c8315..a6b9da6 100644 --- a/memory.c +++ b/memory.c @@ -1948,6 +1948,14 @@ void memory_region_notify_one(IOMMUNotifier *notifier, return; } + if (entry->iova < notifier->start) { + entry->iova = notifier->start; + } + + if (entry->iova + entry->addr_mask > notifier->end) { + entry->addr_mask = notifier->end - entry->iova; + } + if (entry->perm & IOMMU_RW) { printf("map %lx %lx\n", entry->iova, entry->iova + entry->addr_mask); request_flags = IOMMU_NOTIFIER_MAP;