From patchwork Tue Sep 24 11:41:46 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Ujfalusi X-Patchwork-Id: 11158527 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE101747 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55545214D9 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="hUs7Kw6c"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Fkwsefpm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 55545214D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12C261676; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:41:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 12C261676 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1569325326; bh=cbmKwseRdvcFoX8W0ptCVQSC5a37TrSWrWy7IMFMY/8=; h=From:To:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From; b=hUs7Kw6cWW5zUEgd17F6kkRafM64Pd1zohp73pD1Y5NsF4R8l1Xr/KYF6wB8nx/ug ogtGlf1Cc3A8pfdy5sEz6tEUHjZgMSIYeXVbeLALU+jFTPoYGqquEiIvijl+MbVlUm LQo0oM9hqaEy5VCG43AuG36+IzzvA4pwce5Eu3Mg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9397BF803F4; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:41:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 237C4F8045F; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:41:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,PRX_BODY_78,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2EAF802BD for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:41:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 5E2EAF802BD Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Fkwsefpm" Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OBf7aR122746; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:41:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1569325267; bh=FhhJNnitdBuAjMrCRFigNGOWOuhTB01Qx3/X9Vv9CJQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date; b=FkwsefpmwabyEUVFH2TUsAxR92P75+CEhu70exVsgyPTAqGQAkx47UXOKYTrtgi+9 SHbpzYCIzbcLGMTzXzJ2Yej0fyfm+p+5sWTj0UeB7q3B4H9I9bhgGMf6JkjmNpoXVN c9Mxr+DdUALBEtSUmhfpTdI/rWmN0K5l0Is/96tI= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8OBf7PL084631 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:41:07 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:41:00 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:41:00 -0500 Received: from feketebors.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OBf4Vs102889; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:41:04 -0500 From: Peter Ujfalusi To: , Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:41:46 +0300 Message-ID: <20190924114146.8116-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Cc: tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Subject: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: Use different sequence for start/stop trigger X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On stream stop currently we stop the DMA first followed by the CPU DAI. This can cause underflow (playback) or overflow (capture) on the DAI side as the DMA is no longer feeding data while the DAI is still active. It can be observed easily if the DAI side does not have FIFO (or it is disabled) to survive the time while the DMA is stopped, but still can happen on relatively slow CPUs when relatively high sampling rate is used: the FIFO is drained between the time the DMA is stopped and the DAI is stopped. It can only fixed by using different sequence within trigger for 'stop' and 'start': case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: Start DMA first followed by CPU DAI (currently used sequence) case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: Stop CPU DAI first followed by DMA Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi --- Hi, on a new TI platform (j721e) where we can disable the McASP FIFO (the CPU dai) since the UDMA + PDMA provides the buffering I have started to see error interrupts right after pcm_trigger:STOP and in rare cases even on PAUSE that McASP underruns. I was also able to reproduce the same issue on am335x board, but it is much harder to trigger it. With this patch the underrun after trigger:STOP is gone. If I think about the issue, I'm not sure why it was not noticed before as the behavior makes sense: we stop the DMA first then we stop the CPU DAI. If between the DMA stop and DAI stop we would need a sample in the DAI (which is still running) then for sure we will underrun in the HW (or overrun in case of capture). When I run the ALSA conformance test [1] it is easier to trigger. Not sure if anyone else have seen such underrun/overrun when stopping a stream, but the fact that I have seen it with both UDMA+PDMA and EDMA on different platforms makes me wonder if the issue can be seen on other platforms as well. [1] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/audiotest/+/master/alsa_conformance_test.md Regards, Peter --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index e163dde5eab1..c96430e70752 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) return 0; } -static int soc_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) +static int soc_pcm_trigger_start(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data; struct snd_soc_component *component; @@ -1056,24 +1056,60 @@ static int soc_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai; int i, ret; + for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) { + component = rtdcom->component; + + ret = snd_soc_component_trigger(component, substream, cmd); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) { ret = snd_soc_dai_trigger(codec_dai, substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) return ret; } - for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) { - component = rtdcom->component; + snd_soc_dai_trigger(cpu_dai, substream, cmd); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; - ret = snd_soc_component_trigger(component, substream, cmd); + if (rtd->dai_link->ops->trigger) { + ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) return ret; } + return 0; +} + +static int soc_pcm_trigger_stop(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) +{ + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data; + struct snd_soc_component *component; + struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list *rtdcom; + struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = rtd->cpu_dai; + struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai; + int i, ret; + snd_soc_dai_trigger(cpu_dai, substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) return ret; + for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) { + ret = snd_soc_dai_trigger(codec_dai, substream, cmd); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) { + component = rtdcom->component; + + ret = snd_soc_component_trigger(component, substream, cmd); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + if (rtd->dai_link->ops->trigger) { ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) @@ -1083,6 +1119,28 @@ static int soc_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) return 0; } +static int soc_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) +{ + int ret; + + switch (cmd) { + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START: + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME: + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: + ret = soc_pcm_trigger_start(substream, cmd); + break; + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: + ret = soc_pcm_trigger_stop(substream, cmd); + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return ret; +} + static int soc_pcm_bespoke_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) {