From patchwork Fri Oct 25 00:41:40 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 11211179 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E9114ED for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7967321D71 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387705AbfJYAlo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:41:44 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:65441 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726164AbfJYAlo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:41:44 -0400 Received: from 79.184.254.57.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.254.57) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.292) id 3d5b083a06540a5e; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:41:41 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: Linux PM , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:41:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2435090.1mJ0fSsrDY@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki The _PPC change notifications from the platform firmware are per-CPU, so acpi_processor_ppc_init() needs to add a frequency QoS request for each CPU covered by a cpufreq policy to take all of them into account. Even though ACPI thermal control of CPUs sets frequency limits per processor package, it also needs a frequency QoS request for each CPU in a cpufreq policy in case some of them are taken offline and the frequency limit needs to be set through the remaining online ones (this is slightly excessive, because all CPUs covered by one cpufreq policy will set the same frequency limit through their QoS requests, but it is not incorrect). Modify the code in accordance with the above observations. Fixes: d15ce412737a ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -127,26 +127,34 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigne void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - int cpu = policy->cpu; - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); - int ret; - - if (!pr) - return; - - ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &pr->thermal_req, - FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX); - if (ret < 0) - pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, - ret); + unsigned int cpu; + + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + int ret; + + if (!pr) + continue; + + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, + &pr->thermal_req, + FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX); + if (ret < 0) + pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", + cpu, ret); + } } void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu); + unsigned int cpu; + + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu); - if (pr) - freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req); + if (pr) + freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req); + } } #else /* ! CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */ static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -159,26 +159,34 @@ void acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(void void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - int cpu = policy->cpu; - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); - int ret; - - if (!pr) - return; - - ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &pr->perflib_req, - FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX); - if (ret < 0) - pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, - ret); + unsigned int cpu; + + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + int ret; + + if (!pr) + continue; + + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, + &pr->perflib_req, + FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX); + if (ret < 0) + pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", + cpu, ret); + } } void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu); + unsigned int cpu; + + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); - if (pr) - freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req); + if (pr) + freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req); + } } static int acpi_processor_get_performance_control(struct acpi_processor *pr)