From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:26:42 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400947 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8C113A4 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AFDC20836 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:29:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4AFDC20836 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17892-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 19694 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 19652 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:28:59 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:26:42 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <87v9nw0x4t.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6Gb7-0007hr-Mu;;;mid=<87v9nw0x4t.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+1jB7207zqKuGkzNocTI/FE1FQ8bEJSFo= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,LotsOfNums_01,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4979] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.2 LotsOfNums_01 BODY: Lots of long strings of numbers * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=98] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=98 X-Spam-Combo: *;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 533 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.5%), b_tie_ro: 2.0 (0.4%), parse: 0.97 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 11 (2.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.63 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 15 (2.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.24 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.04 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 27 (5.0%), check_bayes: 25 (4.8%), b_tokenize: 10 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.9 (0.7%), b_finish: 0.62 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 462 (86.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (0.5%), poll_dns_idle: 0.64 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when this field is already here and serving the same purporse. Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that it is no longer sysctl specific. Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when proc_inode is initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- fs/proc/inode.c | 1 + fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index 6da18316d209..bdae442d5262 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) ei->pde = NULL; ei->sysctl = NULL; ei->sysctl_entry = NULL; + INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ei->sibling_inodes); ei->ns_ops = NULL; return &ei->vfs_inode; } diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index 41587276798e..366cd3aa690b 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct proc_inode { struct proc_dir_entry *pde; struct ctl_table_header *sysctl; struct ctl_table *sysctl_entry; - struct hlist_node sysctl_inodes; + struct hlist_node sibling_inodes; const struct proc_ns_operations *ns_ops; struct inode vfs_inode; } __randomize_layout; diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index c75bb4632ed1..42fbb7f3c587 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -279,9 +279,9 @@ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes); if (!node) break; - ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sysctl_inodes); + ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes); spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes); spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); inode = &ei->vfs_inode; @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, } ei->sysctl = head; ei->sysctl_entry = table; - hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes); + hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes, &head->inodes); head->count++; spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, void proc_sys_evict_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ctl_table_header *head) { spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sibling_inodes); if (!--head->count) kfree_rcu(head, rcu); spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:27:17 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400953 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0B913A4 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5B9A2080D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:29:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E5B9A2080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17893-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 20476 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:29:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 20434 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:29:33 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:27:17 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <87pne40x3u.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6Gbg-0007qC-Jo;;;mid=<87pne40x3u.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/UflptKI2kFaz4P7DX3c7LedTcEBcQNz8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=81] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=81 X-Spam-Combo: *;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 344 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 1.99 (0.6%), parse: 1.07 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (3.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.86 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 15 (4.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.27 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.07 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 28 (8.1%), check_bayes: 26 (7.7%), b_tokenize: 11 (3.2%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (2.1%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.7 (1.1%), b_finish: 0.66 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 271 (78.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.63 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.2 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 0.68 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 7 (2.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) This prepares the way for allowing the pid part of proc to use this dcache pruning code as well. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- fs/proc/inode.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 35 +---------------------------------- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index bdae442d5262..74ce4a8d05eb 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -103,6 +103,44 @@ void __init proc_init_kmemcache(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) >= SIZEOF_PDE); } +void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) +{ + struct inode *inode; + struct proc_inode *ei; + struct hlist_node *node; + struct super_block *sb; + + rcu_read_lock(); + for (;;) { + node = hlist_first_rcu(inodes); + if (!node) + break; + ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes); + spin_lock(lock); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes); + spin_unlock(lock); + + inode = &ei->vfs_inode; + sb = inode->i_sb; + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) + continue; + inode = igrab(inode); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (unlikely(!inode)) { + deactivate_super(sb); + rcu_read_lock(); + continue; + } + + d_prune_aliases(inode); + iput(inode); + deactivate_super(sb); + + rcu_read_lock(); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) { struct super_block *sb = root->d_sb; diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index 366cd3aa690b..ba9a991824a5 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ extern const struct inode_operations proc_pid_link_inode_operations; extern const struct super_operations proc_sops; void proc_init_kmemcache(void); +void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock); void set_proc_pid_nlink(void); extern struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *, struct proc_dir_entry *); extern void proc_entry_rundown(struct proc_dir_entry *); diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index 42fbb7f3c587..5da9d7f7ae34 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -269,40 +269,7 @@ static void unuse_table(struct ctl_table_header *p) static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) { - struct inode *inode; - struct proc_inode *ei; - struct hlist_node *node; - struct super_block *sb; - - rcu_read_lock(); - for (;;) { - node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes); - if (!node) - break; - ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes); - spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes); - spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); - - inode = &ei->vfs_inode; - sb = inode->i_sb; - if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) - continue; - inode = igrab(inode); - rcu_read_unlock(); - if (unlikely(!inode)) { - deactivate_super(sb); - rcu_read_lock(); - continue; - } - - d_prune_aliases(inode); - iput(inode); - deactivate_super(sb); - - rcu_read_lock(); - } - rcu_read_unlock(); + proc_prune_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock); } /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */ From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:27:49 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400959 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C601395 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AE5A2080D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:30:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0AE5A2080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17894-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 22265 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:30:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 22226 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:30:05 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:27:49 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <87k14c0x2y.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6GcC-0007x0-LM;;;mid=<87k14c0x2y.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/PBz/fWPf6jpbA0LkgeAc4T35MgRRLVLo= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 473 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.12 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.2 (0.7%), b_tie_ro: 2.0 (0.4%), parse: 2.1 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (3.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.62 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 16 (3.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.35 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.15 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 28 (6.0%), check_bayes: 27 (5.6%), b_tokenize: 9 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.5%), b_comp_prob: 2.5 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 6 (1.2%), b_finish: 0.95 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 390 (82.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.81 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.5 (0.5%), poll_dns_idle: 0.57 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 11 (2.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] proc: In proc_prune_siblings_dcache cache an aquired super block X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Because there are likely to be several sysctls in a row on the same superblock cache the super_block after the count has been raised and don't deactivate it until we are processing another super_block. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index 74ce4a8d05eb..fa2dc732cd77 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -108,10 +108,11 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) struct inode *inode; struct proc_inode *ei; struct hlist_node *node; - struct super_block *sb; + struct super_block *old_sb = NULL; rcu_read_lock(); for (;;) { + struct super_block *sb; node = hlist_first_rcu(inodes); if (!node) break; @@ -122,23 +123,28 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) inode = &ei->vfs_inode; sb = inode->i_sb; - if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) + if ((sb != old_sb) && !atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) continue; inode = igrab(inode); rcu_read_unlock(); + if (sb != old_sb) { + if (old_sb) + deactivate_super(old_sb); + old_sb = sb; + } if (unlikely(!inode)) { - deactivate_super(sb); rcu_read_lock(); continue; } d_prune_aliases(inode); iput(inode); - deactivate_super(sb); rcu_read_lock(); } rcu_read_unlock(); + if (old_sb) + deactivate_super(old_sb); } static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:28:22 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400967 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A555C924 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1E2B2084E for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:30:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E1E2B2084E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17895-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 24089 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 24047 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:30:39 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:28:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <87eeuk0x21.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6Gcj-00087b-GZ;;;mid=<87eeuk0x21.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/swQCQNy2YwWznsTE8zPB0PTznWyDneD8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1256 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.2%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.2%), parse: 1.05 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (1.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 30 (2.4%), tests_pri_-950: 2.0 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.43 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 49 (3.9%), check_bayes: 47 (3.8%), b_tokenize: 18 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 18 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.7 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.5 (0.4%), b_finish: 0.88 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 1142 (90.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.96 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 0.52 (0.0%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 11 (0.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] proc: Use d_invalidate in proc_prune_siblings_dcache X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) The function d_prune_aliases has the problem that it will only prune aliases thare are completely unused. It will not remove aliases for the dcache or even think of removing mounts from the dcache. For that behavior d_invalidate is needed. To use d_invalidate replace d_prune_aliases with d_find_alias followed by d_invalidate and dput. For completeness the directory and the non-directory cases are separated because in theory (although not in currently in practice for proc) directories can only ever have a single dentry while non-directories can have hardlinks and thus multiple dentries. As part of this separation use d_find_any_alias for directories to spare d_find_alias the extra work of doing that. Plus the differences between d_find_any_alias and d_find_alias makes it clear why the directory and non-directory code and not share code. To make it clear these routines now invalidate dentries rename proc_prune_siblings_dache to proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache, and rename proc_sys_prune_dcache proc_sys_invalidate_dcache. V2: Split the directory and non-directory cases. To make this code robust to future changes in proc. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/inode.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index fa2dc732cd77..ba6acd300ce1 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void __init proc_init_kmemcache(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) >= SIZEOF_PDE); } -void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) +void proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) { struct inode *inode; struct proc_inode *ei; @@ -137,7 +137,19 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) continue; } - d_prune_aliases(inode); + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { + struct dentry *dir = d_find_any_alias(inode); + if (dir) { + d_invalidate(dir); + dput(dir); + } + } else { + struct dentry *dentry; + while ((dentry = d_find_alias(inode))) { + d_invalidate(dentry); + dput(dentry); + } + } iput(inode); rcu_read_lock(); diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index ba9a991824a5..fd470172675f 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ extern const struct inode_operations proc_pid_link_inode_operations; extern const struct super_operations proc_sops; void proc_init_kmemcache(void); -void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock); +void proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock); void set_proc_pid_nlink(void); extern struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *, struct proc_dir_entry *); extern void proc_entry_rundown(struct proc_dir_entry *); diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index 5da9d7f7ae34..b6f5d459b087 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ static void unuse_table(struct ctl_table_header *p) complete(p->unregistering); } -static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) +static void proc_sys_invalidate_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) { - proc_prune_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock); + proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock); } /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */ @@ -291,10 +291,10 @@ static void start_unregistering(struct ctl_table_header *p) spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); } /* - * Prune dentries for unregistered sysctls: namespaced sysctls + * Invalidate dentries for unregistered sysctls: namespaced sysctls * can have duplicate names and contaminate dcache very badly. */ - proc_sys_prune_dcache(p); + proc_sys_invalidate_dcache(p); /* * do not remove from the list until nobody holds it; walking the * list in do_sysctl() relies on that. From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:28:52 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400973 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4BD924 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3CA22080D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C3CA22080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17896-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 25905 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 25862 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:31:07 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:28:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <878sks0x17.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6GdC-0008NS-PR;;;mid=<878sks0x17.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/NfwOWxBX9r3Z8pi4MDRB4DTaiQmzw4s0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4979] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=91] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=91 X-Spam-Combo: ;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 245 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.6 (1.1%), b_tie_ro: 1.81 (0.7%), parse: 1.25 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (6.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.56 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (7.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.56 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.24 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 28 (11.3%), check_bayes: 26 (10.8%), b_tokenize: 7 (3.0%), b_tok_get_all: 11 (4.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.9%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.5 (1.8%), b_finish: 0.62 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 164 (67.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.49 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.9%), poll_dns_idle: 0.79 (0.3%), tests_pri_10: 1.79 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 7 (2.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] proc: Clear the pieces of proc_inode that proc_evict_inode cares about X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) This just keeps everything tidier, and allows for using flags like SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU where slabs are not always cleared before reuse. I don't see reuse without reinitializing happening with the proc_inode but I had a false alarm while reworking flushing of proc dentries and indoes when a process dies that caused me to tidy this up. The code is a little easier to follow and reason about this way so I figured the changes might as well be kept. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index ba6acd300ce1..d9243b24554a 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -33,21 +33,27 @@ static void proc_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct proc_dir_entry *de; struct ctl_table_header *head; + struct proc_inode *ei = PROC_I(inode); truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data); clear_inode(inode); /* Stop tracking associated processes */ - put_pid(PROC_I(inode)->pid); + if (ei->pid) { + put_pid(ei->pid); + ei->pid = NULL; + } /* Let go of any associated proc directory entry */ - de = PDE(inode); - if (de) + de = ei->pde; + if (de) { pde_put(de); + ei->pde = NULL; + } - head = PROC_I(inode)->sysctl; + head = ei->sysctl; if (head) { - RCU_INIT_POINTER(PROC_I(inode)->sysctl, NULL); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ei->sysctl, NULL); proc_sys_evict_inode(inode, head); } } From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:29:38 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400979 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3C2924 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A2A92080D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A2A92080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17897-patchwork-kernel-hardening=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 27882 invoked by uid 550); 24 Feb 2020 16:31:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 27842 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2020 16:31:57 -0000 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:29:38 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <8736b00wzx.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6Gdx-00052X-3L;;;mid=<8736b00wzx.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19MH8OOLAnkeXKMBLr4LWC1fUGnAEgCvqg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,LotsOfNums_01, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_XMDrugObfuBody_08, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.2 LotsOfNums_01 BODY: Lots of long strings of numbers * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.4 FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD Contains multiple odd letter combinations * 1.0 T_XMDrugObfuBody_08 obfuscated drug references * 0.0 T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT Fill in a short form with personal * information X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 3638 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.09 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 8 (0.2%), b_tie_ro: 5 (0.1%), parse: 2.2 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 24 (0.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 6 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 26 (0.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.80 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.11 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 52 (1.4%), check_bayes: 50 (1.4%), b_tokenize: 23 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 14 (0.4%), b_comp_prob: 4.3 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 6 (0.2%), b_finish: 0.72 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 580 (15.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.93 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (0.1%), poll_dns_idle: 2927 (80.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 2937 (80.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Rework the flushing of proc to use a list of directory inodes that need to be flushed. The list is kept on struct pid not on struct task_struct, as there is a fixed connection between proc inodes and pids but at least for the case of de_thread the pid of a task_struct changes. This removes the dependency on proc_mnt which allows for different mounts of proc having different mount options even in the same pid namespace and this allows for the removal of proc_mnt which will trivially the first mount of proc to honor it's mount options. This flushing remains an optimization. The functions pid_delete_dentry and pid_revalidate ensure that ordinary dcache management will not attempt to use dentries past the point their respective task has died. When unused the shrinker will eventually be able to remove these dentries. There is a case in de_thread where proc_flush_pid can be called early for a given pid. Which winds up being safe (if suboptimal) as this is just an optiimization. Only pid directories are put on the list as the other per pid files are children of those directories and d_invalidate on the directory will get them as well. So that the pid can be used during flushing it's reference count is taken in release_task and dropped in proc_flush_pid. Further the call of proc_flush_pid is moved after the tasklist_lock is released in release_task so that it is certain that the pid has already been unhashed when flushing it taking place. This removes a small race where a dentry could recreated. As struct pid is supposed to be small and I need a per pid lock I reuse the only lock that currently exists in struct pid the the wait_pidfd.lock. The net result is that this adds all of this functionality with just a little extra list management overhead and a single extra pointer in struct pid. v2: Initialize pid->inodes. I somehow failed to get that initialization into the initial version of the patch. A boot failure was reported by "kernel test robot ", and failure to initialize that pid->inodes matches all of the reported symptoms. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- fs/proc/base.c | 111 +++++++++++++--------------------------- fs/proc/inode.c | 2 +- fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + include/linux/pid.h | 1 + include/linux/proc_fs.h | 4 +- kernel/exit.c | 4 +- kernel/pid.c | 1 + 7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c index c7c64272b0fa..e7efe9d6f3d6 100644 --- a/fs/proc/base.c +++ b/fs/proc/base.c @@ -1834,11 +1834,25 @@ void task_dump_owner(struct task_struct *task, umode_t mode, *rgid = gid; } +void proc_pid_evict_inode(struct proc_inode *ei) +{ + struct pid *pid = ei->pid; + + if (S_ISDIR(ei->vfs_inode.i_mode)) { + spin_lock(&pid->wait_pidfd.lock); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes); + spin_unlock(&pid->wait_pidfd.lock); + } + + put_pid(pid); +} + struct inode *proc_pid_make_inode(struct super_block * sb, struct task_struct *task, umode_t mode) { struct inode * inode; struct proc_inode *ei; + struct pid *pid; /* We need a new inode */ @@ -1856,10 +1870,18 @@ struct inode *proc_pid_make_inode(struct super_block * sb, /* * grab the reference to task. */ - ei->pid = get_task_pid(task, PIDTYPE_PID); - if (!ei->pid) + pid = get_task_pid(task, PIDTYPE_PID); + if (!pid) goto out_unlock; + /* Let the pid remember us for quick removal */ + ei->pid = pid; + if (S_ISDIR(mode)) { + spin_lock(&pid->wait_pidfd.lock); + hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes, &pid->inodes); + spin_unlock(&pid->wait_pidfd.lock); + } + task_dump_owner(task, 0, &inode->i_uid, &inode->i_gid); security_task_to_inode(task, inode); @@ -3230,90 +3252,29 @@ static const struct inode_operations proc_tgid_base_inode_operations = { .permission = proc_pid_permission, }; -static void proc_flush_task_mnt(struct vfsmount *mnt, pid_t pid, pid_t tgid) -{ - struct dentry *dentry, *leader, *dir; - char buf[10 + 1]; - struct qstr name; - - name.name = buf; - name.len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%u", pid); - /* no ->d_hash() rejects on procfs */ - dentry = d_hash_and_lookup(mnt->mnt_root, &name); - if (dentry) { - d_invalidate(dentry); - dput(dentry); - } - - if (pid == tgid) - return; - - name.name = buf; - name.len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%u", tgid); - leader = d_hash_and_lookup(mnt->mnt_root, &name); - if (!leader) - goto out; - - name.name = "task"; - name.len = strlen(name.name); - dir = d_hash_and_lookup(leader, &name); - if (!dir) - goto out_put_leader; - - name.name = buf; - name.len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%u", pid); - dentry = d_hash_and_lookup(dir, &name); - if (dentry) { - d_invalidate(dentry); - dput(dentry); - } - - dput(dir); -out_put_leader: - dput(leader); -out: - return; -} - /** - * proc_flush_task - Remove dcache entries for @task from the /proc dcache. - * @task: task that should be flushed. + * proc_flush_pid - Remove dcache entries for @pid from the /proc dcache. + * @pid: pid that should be flushed. * - * When flushing dentries from proc, one needs to flush them from global - * proc (proc_mnt) and from all the namespaces' procs this task was seen - * in. This call is supposed to do all of this job. - * - * Looks in the dcache for - * /proc/@pid - * /proc/@tgid/task/@pid - * if either directory is present flushes it and all of it'ts children - * from the dcache. + * This function walks a list of inodes (that belong to any proc + * filesystem) that are attached to the pid and flushes them from + * the dentry cache. * * It is safe and reasonable to cache /proc entries for a task until * that task exits. After that they just clog up the dcache with * useless entries, possibly causing useful dcache entries to be - * flushed instead. This routine is proved to flush those useless - * dcache entries at process exit time. + * flushed instead. This routine is provided to flush those useless + * dcache entries when a process is reaped. * * NOTE: This routine is just an optimization so it does not guarantee - * that no dcache entries will exist at process exit time it - * just makes it very unlikely that any will persist. + * that no dcache entries will exist after a process is reaped + * it just makes it very unlikely that any will persist. */ -void proc_flush_task(struct task_struct *task) +void proc_flush_pid(struct pid *pid) { - int i; - struct pid *pid, *tgid; - struct upid *upid; - - pid = task_pid(task); - tgid = task_tgid(task); - - for (i = 0; i <= pid->level; i++) { - upid = &pid->numbers[i]; - proc_flush_task_mnt(upid->ns->proc_mnt, upid->nr, - tgid->numbers[i].nr); - } + proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(&pid->inodes, &pid->wait_pidfd.lock); + put_pid(pid); } static struct dentry *proc_pid_instantiate(struct dentry * dentry, diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index d9243b24554a..1e730ea1dcd6 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void proc_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) /* Stop tracking associated processes */ if (ei->pid) { - put_pid(ei->pid); + proc_pid_evict_inode(ei); ei->pid = NULL; } diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index fd470172675f..9e294f0290e5 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ extern int proc_pid_statm(struct seq_file *, struct pid_namespace *, extern const struct dentry_operations pid_dentry_operations; extern int pid_getattr(const struct path *, struct kstat *, u32, unsigned int); extern int proc_setattr(struct dentry *, struct iattr *); +extern void proc_pid_evict_inode(struct proc_inode *); extern struct inode *proc_pid_make_inode(struct super_block *, struct task_struct *, umode_t); extern void pid_update_inode(struct task_struct *, struct inode *); extern int pid_delete_dentry(const struct dentry *); diff --git a/include/linux/pid.h b/include/linux/pid.h index 998ae7d24450..01a0d4e28506 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid.h +++ b/include/linux/pid.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct pid unsigned int level; /* lists of tasks that use this pid */ struct hlist_head tasks[PIDTYPE_MAX]; + struct hlist_head inodes; /* wait queue for pidfd notifications */ wait_queue_head_t wait_pidfd; struct rcu_head rcu; diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h index 3dfa92633af3..40a7982b7285 100644 --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct proc_ops { typedef int (*proc_write_t)(struct file *, char *, size_t); extern void proc_root_init(void); -extern void proc_flush_task(struct task_struct *); +extern void proc_flush_pid(struct pid *); extern struct proc_dir_entry *proc_symlink(const char *, struct proc_dir_entry *, const char *); @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline void proc_root_init(void) { } -static inline void proc_flush_task(struct task_struct *task) +static inline void proc_flush_pid(struct pid *pid) { } diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 2833ffb0c211..502b4995b688 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ void put_task_struct_rcu_user(struct task_struct *task) void release_task(struct task_struct *p) { struct task_struct *leader; + struct pid *thread_pid; int zap_leader; repeat: /* don't need to get the RCU readlock here - the process is dead and @@ -199,11 +200,11 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p) atomic_dec(&__task_cred(p)->user->processes); rcu_read_unlock(); - proc_flush_task(p); cgroup_release(p); write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); ptrace_release_task(p); + thread_pid = get_pid(p->thread_pid); __exit_signal(p); /* @@ -226,6 +227,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p) } write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + proc_flush_pid(thread_pid); release_thread(p); put_task_struct_rcu_user(p); diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c index 0f4ecb57214c..ca08d6a3aa77 100644 --- a/kernel/pid.c +++ b/kernel/pid.c @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t *set_tid, INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&pid->tasks[type]); init_waitqueue_head(&pid->wait_pidfd); + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&pid->inodes); upid = pid->numbers + ns->level; spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);