From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:13 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456369 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C38D13A4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE53920714 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="AJd3IAC7"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="JepYCPNi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EE53920714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1JPUVqjgeyUgcaPzg84qLAY8yqjzDPnUTtyFCckKOEg=; b=AJd3IAC7sRISfr GZIsufKS1zwlSNMNa7WxmN2gCh1g/GDxPq9quX6yXlBUzOcVg/IQ5ov+q1jea8Ui3amGVhMULbf+u jXYF6DYP0ziED+WJFsmhtWmOC7ySuEAaqeW13OKgLnlkvj5tgEGq1RA0AjQxIKZhFlFYCwYyHxiOH CCIW+n6F8nu+4zhkGd0r80oSPbSjJ4L6cEUVC0lsOGJaXAKepWnH6cs1MLuv73mFyN4H59cffloVH tT1URWxI75dzhioa+GLmE3X6vILhkTqgS28e3lwlTLVGmY1bClNh1Gtgcy3kNEkt6J8i+gYX0mpOW pGQoRDyllMvr8Vb8GEKw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0M-0003Iz-4b; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:30 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0J-0003I6-Ak for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:28 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIObx089240; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081104; bh=8qgGwfZnwiU6/Ir3wlJnjMa4hJEnhp9Vr0iuUASMO6M=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JepYCPNiGgj420B1JhpJuS7Ka+IMxnnobyJvzgCmwKWuHJ07sIjjxWsmDo2trprGE TiQ3wUGFXu086tg2NZAgpzncMix8DUZsrUQJEpLgIVCzX2OUbVESwBz/Gt2XUUfrnw ReQYqC1E75z1pmavpuPrPYhR37TpCCIN5GiQIba8= Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (dfle101.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.22]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKINUX110238; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKINTN083843; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIMmN084957; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:23 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 1/7] remoteproc: add prepare and unprepare ops Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131827_496690_BF41406C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.00 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Loic Pallardy , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Loic Pallardy On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading co-processor firmware. This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute platform specific function before firmware loading and after stop execution. Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 26f6947267d2..aca6d022901a 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1394,12 +1394,22 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) return ret; } + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */ + if (rproc->ops->prepare) { + ret = rproc->ops->prepare(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", + rproc->name, ret); + goto disable_iommu; + } + } + rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw); /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */ ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw); if (ret) - goto disable_iommu; + goto unprepare_rproc; /* reset max_notifyid */ rproc->max_notifyid = -1; @@ -1433,6 +1443,10 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) kfree(rproc->cached_table); rproc->cached_table = NULL; rproc->table_ptr = NULL; +unprepare_rproc: + /* release HW resources if needed */ + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); disable_iommu: rproc_disable_iommu(rproc); return ret; @@ -1838,6 +1852,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) /* clean up all acquired resources */ rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc); + /* release HW resources if needed */ + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); + rproc_disable_iommu(rproc); /* Free the copy of the resource table */ diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h index 07bd73a6d72a..ddce7a7775d1 100644 --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { /** * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop * @start: power on the device and boot it * @stop: power off the device * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter) @@ -371,6 +373,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { * @get_boot_addr: get boot address to entry point specified in firmware */ struct rproc_ops { + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc); + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc); int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc); int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc); void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid); From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:14 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456387 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1052513A4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E24208FE for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="cg2r6C62"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="rnjQeB+e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E1E24208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GSzXYOfG+DLNoLwwCyx/eB+gCgHx9V/TXMWBKZMshdk=; b=cg2r6C62F0O8i2 LDoxNhh4AzUnpKVGJTul5p83MdYWlH2OlZcGi5/reJWHmcszQI3mRukmodz3aziJtpxLqlkSZTNeF p3Ly/y1s34XRcS6V+Yj/teNvVIDaerQ4k62jPDsH13qDEt7PThCgHTqJ8F4yparFsyCxhWwtJ3Fhu ToqIXonxFj4GYlmyk+hPNWMGD90sSDwpwfTNVC1UPjbxrbYtZzoc1XzUK265/cTCk4NW2G2pyzvpb MNpQR14OWNCoMRAorpLli1rtUfESgDxMRPftBDTjyqNg6TUy6NlEh5lFBesD98gzIW8eq4XVgZsq+ 1f0c1j5bIn32DVMuLkPQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0q-0003lO-TJ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:00 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0M-0003Im-PP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:32 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIQ1j104165; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081106; bh=Yjhl9EQ14R/kACUXumM+AqugWYYqz1aQVf2tw0BsJh4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=rnjQeB+exVSr4M4lObIpZlugcIYzXomQxbjz12iVw5J1x2A9D5GRSXbR47+tCzhLb YZLJXPYIM5OJlnQtbgY0OG+zPWmosPtk14JDryoPL2YgqEG8QKSMcXeyvW05oEXLxs MZBZz9PyjwJqSwOUbF1u5jSFfveLLfEBLDeZvKfg= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02OKIQ12013610 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:26 -0500 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:26 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:26 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIPGj124170; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:25 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIPpq084965; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:25 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 2/7] remoteproc: use a local copy for the name field Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131831_000237_A5864A49 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.24 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.249 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call. The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver probe function. So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 9 ++++++++- include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index aca6d022901a..6e0b91fa6f11 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1989,6 +1989,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) kfree(rproc->firmware); kfree(rproc->ops); + kfree(rproc->name); kfree(rproc); } @@ -2061,7 +2062,13 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, } rproc->firmware = p; - rproc->name = name; + rproc->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!rproc->name) { + kfree(p); + kfree(rproc->ops); + kfree(rproc); + return NULL; + } rproc->priv = &rproc[1]; rproc->auto_boot = true; rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32; diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h index ddce7a7775d1..77788a4bb94e 100644 --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment { struct rproc { struct list_head node; struct iommu_domain *domain; - const char *name; + char *name; char *firmware; void *priv; struct rproc_ops *ops; From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:15 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456389 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB77913 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 499F92070A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="cpigG639"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="nX4t7jL5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 499F92070A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LxHaktBMDYpOtxNJgupGWKJaTK5iqqGxp3u1ILyPi4k=; b=cpigG639gCuOO4 37SgEw+BDE1NQcX7uowJARZxW++AIlomqcu/KxF7UlWRV7lQg49AnnxNPrdfxoRkwnFpEEYMBEivT 8Kx64PbpjtMRah7VBV2QbmeI5Ss0k84bJMPInqwQgCOH0is8LdRNIW7XcZtNBZyafbJQun+y1Nbuy 1pU7afX+xHHWHGTcKt90/iAC1yfKOnnhypbEG6aVqSmx08FuQXAUoEpqL1Jqq0MRs4kYd/h+Gc2Mn MmnJg/tAig/4MBDSVUylA+jBR94KxjdSsRaV4MBgjTvPaFQTZWUSox9jtzqTpIm0q83/5MNyhRrbx SGvjpSJ3ZQP525QSHzqA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq19-000490-Eu; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:19 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0M-0003Iy-8J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:33 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIRoE127622; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081107; bh=j6LS4IOsfm/RdsyQPN1G1nNYdAr7sEZSWcOzUrY9lh8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=nX4t7jL52ynqbleKUKjn4fGlZirB9T2B+cggwgt7g+s5f+/jaLW8ZbuYChB3YDdod zgPUZ/6LN4sT8iuqVjRfuxvSz+THRck2ZqTS2E6fk0wHAa8aIayOvnu6559gaBRiln SGMLQ9ByUpmyWbK/K8b5Wpl91xm4ukozBMMq7s+s= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02OKIRMD065698 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:27 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:27 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:27 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIRDF113526; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:27 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIQOE084973; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:26 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for R5F subsystem on TI K3 SoCs Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131830_418780_08B1C8FB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.10 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.248 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one or more dual-core Arm Cortex R5F processor subsystems/clusters (R5FSS). The clusters can be split between multiple voltage domains as well. Add the device tree bindings document for these R5F subsystem devices. These R5F processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. The nodes require more than one memory region, with the first memory region used for DMA allocations at runtime. The remaining memory regions are reserved and are used for the loading and running of the R5F remote processors. The R5F processors can also optionally use any internal on-chip SRAM memories either for executing code or using it as fast-access data. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the single R5FSS device present on K3 AM65x family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- Hi Rob, The dt_bindings_check seems to throw couple of warnings around the usage of ranges because the tooling is adding the #address-cells and #size-cells of 1 by default, whereas our actual code uses 2. No issues are found with dtbs_check. regards Suman .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml | 338 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 338 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..bbfc1e6ae884 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,338 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: TI K3 R5F processor subsystems + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more dual-core Arm Cortex R5F + processor subsystems/clusters (R5FSS). The dual core cluster can be used + either in a LockStep mode providing safety/fault tolerance features or in a + Split mode providing two individual compute cores for doubling the compute + capacity. These are used together with other processors present on the SoC + to achieve various system level goals. + + Each Dual-Core R5F sub-system is represented as a single DTS node + representing the cluster, with a pair of child DT nodes representing + the individual R5F cores. Each node has a number of required or optional + properties that enable the OS running on the host processor to perform + the device management of the remote processor and to communicate with the + remote processor. + +# Required properties: +# -------------------- +# The following are the mandatory properties: + +properties: + $nodename: + pattern: "^r5fss(@.*)?" + + compatible: + enum: + - ti,am654-r5fss + - ti,j721e-r5fss + + power-domains: + description: | + Should contain a phandle to a PM domain provider node and an args + specifier containing the R5FSS device id value. This property is + as per the binding, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt + maxItems: 1 + + "#address-cells": + const: 1 + + "#size-cells": + const: 1 + + ranges: + description: | + Standard ranges definition providing address translations for + local R5F TCM address spaces to bus addresses. + +# Optional properties: +# -------------------- + + lockstep-mode: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + enum: [0, 1] + description: | + Configuration Mode for the Dual R5F cores within the R5F + cluster. Should be either a value of 1 (LockStep mode) or + 0 (Split mode), default is LockStep mode if omitted. + +# R5F Processor Child Nodes: +# ========================== + +patternProperties: + "^r5f@[a-f0-9]+$": + type: object + description: | + The R5F Sub-System device node should define two R5F child nodes, each + node representing a TI instantiation of the Arm Cortex R5F core. There + are some specific integration differences for the IP like the usage of + a Region Address Translator (RAT) for translating the larger SoC bus + addresses into a 32-bit address space for the processor. + +# Required properties: +# -------------------- +# The following are the mandatory properties: + + properties: + compatible: + enum: + - ti,am654-r5f + - ti,j721e-r5f + + reg: + description: | + Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'. + Each entry should have the memory region's start address + and the size of the region, the representation matching + the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values. + maxItems: 2 + + reg-names: + description: | + Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal + internal memory regions, and should be defined in this order + maxItems: 2 + items: + - const: atcm + - const: btcm + + ti,sci: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle + description: + Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node + + ti,sci-dev-id: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: | + Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the R5F core. + Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation + for valid values for the R5F cores. + + ti,sci-proc-ids: + description: Should contain a single tuple of . + allOf: + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix + - maxItems: 1 + items: + items: + - description: TI-SCI processor id for the R5F core device + - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control + ownership should be transferred to + + resets: + description: | + Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node + managing the resets for this device, and a reset + specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings + for the reset argument specifier, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt + for AM65x and J721E SoCs + + firmware-name: + description: | + Should contain the name of the default firmware image + file located on the firmware search path + +# The following properties are mandatory for R5F Core0 in both LockStep and Split +# modes, and are mandatory for R5F Core1 _only_ in Split mode. They are unused for +# R5F Core1 in LockStep mode: + + mboxes: + description: | + OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for + communication with the remote processor. This property should match + with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The specifier + format is as per the bindings, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt + + memory-region: + minItems: 2 + description: | + phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc + device. There should be atleast two reserved memory nodes defined - the + first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring + buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image sections. The + reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as + per the bindings in + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt + +# Optional properties: +# -------------------- +# The following properties are optional properties for each of the R5F cores: + + atcm-enable: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + enum: [0, 1] + description: | + R5F core configuration mode dictating if ATCM should be enabled. R5F + view of ATCM dictated by loczrama property. Should be either a value + of 1 (enabled) or 0 (disabled), default is disabled if omitted. + + btcm-enable: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + enum: [0, 1] + description: | + R5F core configuration mode dictating if BTCM should be enabled. R5F + view of BTCM dictated by loczrama property. Should be either a value + of 1 (enabled) or 0 (disabled), default is enabled if omitted. + + loczrama: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + enum: [0, 1] + description: | + R5F core configuration mode dictating which TCM should appear at + address 0 (from core's view). Should be either a value of 1 (ATCM + at 0x0) or 0 (BTCM at 0x0), default value is 1 if omitted. + + sram: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array + minItems: 1 + description: | + pHandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM region. The regions + should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and + should be defined as per the generic bindings in, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml + + required: + - compatible + - reg + - reg-names + - ti,sci + - ti,sci-dev-id + - ti,sci-proc-ids + - resets + - firmware-name + + additionalProperties: false + +required: + - compatible + - power-domains + - "#address-cells" + - "#size-cells" + - ranges + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + + //Example: AM654 SoC + /* R5F DDR Carveout reserved memory nodes */ + reserved-memory { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + mcu_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@9b000000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0x9b000000 0x00 0x100000>; + no-map; + }; + + mcu_r5fss0_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@9b100000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0x9b100000 0x00 0xf00000>; + no-map; + }; + + mcu_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@9c000000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0x9c000000 0x00 0x100000>; + no-map; + }; + + mcu_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@9c100000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0x9c100000 0x00 0x700000>; + no-map; + }; + }; + + cbass_main: interconnect@100000 { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges = <0x00 0x41000000 0x00 0x41000000 0x00 0x00020000>, + <0x00 0x41400000 0x00 0x41400000 0x00 0x00020000>, + <0x00 0x41c00000 0x00 0x41c00000 0x00 0x00080000>; + + cbass_mcu: interconnect@28380000 { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges = <0x00 0x41000000 0x00 0x41000000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* MCU R5F Core0 */ + <0x00 0x41400000 0x00 0x41400000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* MCU R5F Core1 */ + <0x00 0x41c00000 0x00 0x41c00000 0x00 0x00080000>; /* MCU SRAM */ + + /* MCU domain SRAM node */ + mcu_ram: mcu-ram@41c00000 { + compatible = "mmio-sram"; + reg = <0x00 0x41c00000 0x00 0x80000>; + ranges = <0x0 0x00 0x41c00000 0x80000>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + mcu_r5fss0_core0_sram: r5f-sram@0 { + reg = <0x0 0x40000>; + }; + }; + + /* AM65x MCU R5FSS node */ + mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@41000000 { + compatible = "ti,am654-r5fss"; + power-domains = <&k3_pds 129>; + lockstep-mode = <1>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges = <0x41000000 0x00 0x41000000 0x20000>, + <0x41400000 0x00 0x41400000 0x20000>; + + mcu_r5f0: r5f@41000000 { + compatible = "ti,am654-r5f"; + reg = <0x41000000 0x00008000>, + <0x41010000 0x00008000>; + reg-names = "atcm", "btcm"; + ti,sci = <&dmsc>; + ti,sci-dev-id = <159>; + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x01 0xFF>; + resets = <&k3_reset 159 1>; + firmware-name = "am65x-mcu-r5f0_0-fw"; + atcm-enable = <1>; + btcm-enable = <1>; + loczrama = <1>; + mboxes = <&mailbox0 &mbox_mcu_r5fss0_core0>; + memory-region = <&mcu_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>, + <&mcu_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>; + sram = <&mcu_r5fss0_core0_sram>; + }; + + mcu_r5f1: r5f@41400000 { + compatible = "ti,am654-r5f"; + reg = <0x41400000 0x00008000>, + <0x41410000 0x00008000>; + reg-names = "atcm", "btcm"; + ti,sci = <&dmsc>; + ti,sci-dev-id = <245>; + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x02 0xFF>; + resets = <&k3_reset 245 1>; + firmware-name = "am65x-mcu-r5f0_1-fw"; + atcm-enable = <1>; + btcm-enable = <1>; + loczrama = <1>; + mboxes = <&mailbox1 &mbox_mcu_r5fss0_core1>; + }; + }; + }; + }; From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:16 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456391 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8694613A4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657852070A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="oHS8ksz3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Lfi1tquN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 657852070A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=37BOdZF9QsFlTGBM/CLD1J5QE1LsuijpVb90e2zqeGM=; b=oHS8ksz3ivLXTG 9eRVakOPew4efWV3LeROgKCeTLuYRCLbpkhpOKVbWlCTVPGNOhPmfm3pQrSrvVNDeBKXMRzG/8hgj KafvIQUg3kWdr28U3R4XKWBsfuuKVnRlQgyEI8Z3Cqlfiutz1w3x+egd0poSDTae2m2hgrFl/El9W V47uQhzdwoBvvbc/xxlAyTpl9vSbTRr7MY0WY26xx0aghe3I3Tg6/nvHa7EwR7kGdYkFRhp7T9FDW YuQMCFruCKt4QagB/IrFFw5gB2gloMmKpdZFRTp9bqNRNwt1BbTwl8Yb1tMotKi8gvjbtMRdMbIsO 49NYA32BUTfflxyYMuAw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq1N-0004Kn-3Y; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:33 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0N-0003Jn-0J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:34 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKITcl104171; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081109; bh=/kuxzVWhQryDu4syVvhJCaxGs+LdnNjgJaa46DQPxsg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Lfi1tquNp1lGpjsPXTUgPMobIoLWoQRbHoFn/kJDl+uRQCmfmF28fKpnM2QOzjeg0 yMIdYjSfYPrM8VeP0SLXyPvNCshKYs4db+/WLojoOUrUNJDYHt6f/gCwg4aNrLgrxO AQfscEzG3n/eGXi8OzNR0nIl2BMYxaOv2CtuqcN0= Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (dfle112.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.33]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKITrZ110308; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:29 -0500 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:28 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:28 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKISXI124215; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:28 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIR5J084986; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:28 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add TI-SCI processor control helper functions Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-5-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131831_167544_17BFD393 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.23 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.249 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Texas Instruments' K3 generation SoCs have specific modules/register spaces used for configuring the various aspects of a remote processor. These include power, reset, boot vector and other configuration features specific to each compute processor present on the SoC. These registers are managed by the System Controller such as DMSC on K3 AM65x SoCs. The Texas Instrument's System Control Interface (TI-SCI) Message Protocol is used to communicate to the System Controller from various compute processors to invoke specific services provided by the firmware running on the System Controller. Add a common processor control interface header file that can be used by multiple remoteproc drivers. The helper functions within this header file abstract the various TI SCI protocol ops for the remoteproc drivers, and allow them to request the System Controller to be able to program and manage various remote processors on the SoC. The remoteproc drivers are expected to manage the life-cycle of their ti_sci_proc_dev local structures. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e42d8015b8e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Processor Controller Helper Functions + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H +#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H + +/** + * struct ti_sci_proc - structure representing a processor control client + * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle + * @ops: cached TI-SCI proc ops + * @dev: cached client device pointer + * @proc_id: processor id for the consumer remoteproc device + * @host_id: host id to pass the control over for this consumer remoteproc + * device + */ +struct ti_sci_proc { + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci; + const struct ti_sci_proc_ops *ops; + struct device *dev; + u8 proc_id; + u8 host_id; +}; + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_request(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->request(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor request failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_release(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->release(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor release failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_handover(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->handover(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor handover of %d to %d failed: %d\n", + tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id, ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_config(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 boot_vector, + u32 cfg_set, u32 cfg_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_config(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_set, cfg_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_config failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_control(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u32 ctrl_set, u32 ctrl_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_control(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, ctrl_set, ctrl_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_control failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_get_status(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 *boot_vector, u32 *cfg_flags, + u32 *ctrl_flags, u32 *status_flags) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->get_status(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_flags, ctrl_flags, status_flags); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor get_status failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H */ From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:17 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456397 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E52113A4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 158AD2070A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="iPAfoCZ1"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="bmptp2AB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 158AD2070A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=H15YJHuzfKvW5sYWErfE1WQjVE+LWXO++l2+lU/YcCQ=; b=iPAfoCZ13DZa9P ekzFXDuLY86lmE8U1kK3Kz4qMWyaTTBNfkwrBoT8a4pMLUj15Y5X24cfsVMpoY/VHYJi3AQC4VE9D I7Aaiz9dDI4OLzNhgrLw/L5JZ/EwnQrKklEdmhxrTiXDNX7ZEwDEqcjHF7QdiGJ4Bi/Vp2iPIi7qj r3ARw23CcOsda5wdspra3/BdB4HINNRVB4j/8xrxx2K+H0kUrXN9ODmFDYDlCRGDcJM6QgUWrhlTY DehIu2dnttwTd7VkLLBcg4LcsZeMmZfr41vSCH2RCs07gF9uWsv8LEQQSUHKuLEaNWfdUgUam4IKr GeQ8qQRUCLB6auu1ViSA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq26-0006Hg-BH; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:20:18 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0P-0003LS-4k for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:39 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIU4p089250; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081110; bh=GrN5jUeSbtYoa0Wa++AoKI5cu0eJQ9wcRxvaxK0J0eE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=bmptp2ABL9Hzwv1vit28M6VvZkr6vyUkTTJMUsUVvGZCJSj6Kn5WaCPuCwl6dCI92 wIKNxitqJ4GBEjVo3b482FyHZDHndHQtmtEJVEH9JWiQJ/1+ouPBye32aaSB+wrDCi NNNKgoCbAGhGna3x9D6PWjXuGIOBhTgPG2XBOtQA= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIU6P110331; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:30 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:30 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:30 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIUIQ113578; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:30 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKITmV084991; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:29 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 5/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add a remoteproc driver for R5F subsystem Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:17 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-6-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131833_640699_82FF1EC0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.84 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The TI K3 family of SoCs typically have one or more dual-core Arm Cortex R5F processor clusters/subsystems (R5FSS). This R5F subsystem/cluster can be configured at boot time to be either run in a LockStep mode or in an Asymmetric Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in Split-mode. This subsystem has 64 KB each Tightly-Coupled Memory (TCM) internal memories for each core split between two banks - TCMA and TCMB (further interleaved into two banks). The subsystem does not have an MMU, but has a Region Address Translater (RAT) module that is accessible only from the R5Fs for providing translations between 32-bit CPU addresses into larger system bus addresses. Add a remoteproc driver to support this subsystem to be able to load and boot the R5F cores primarily in LockStep mode. The code also includes the base support for Split mode. Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported. Loading support includes the internal TCMs and DDR. RAT support is left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB. The R5F remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers. The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout regions will be errored out. The R5F processors on TI K3 SoCs require a specific sequence for booting and shutting down the processors. This sequence is also dependent on the mode (LockStep or Split) the R5F cluster is configured for. The R5F cores have a Memory Protection Unit (MPU) that has a default configuration that does not allow the cores to run out of DDR out of reset. This is resolved by using the TCMs for boot-strapping code that applies the appropriate executable permissions on desired DDR memory. The loading into the TCMs requires that the resets be released first with the cores in halted state. The Power Sleep Controller (PSC) module on K3 SoCs requires that the cores be in WFI/WFE states with no active bus transactions before the cores can be put back into reset. Support for this is provided by using the newly introduced .prepare() and .unprepare() ops in the remoteproc core. The .prepare() ops is invoked before any loading, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked after the remoteproc resource cleanup. The R5F core resets are deasserted in .prepare() and asserted in .unprepare(), and the cores themselves are started and halted in .start() and .stop() ops. This ensures symmetric usage and allows the R5F cores state machine to be maintained properly between using the sysfs 'state' variable, bind/unbind and regular module load/unload flows. The subsystem is represented as a single remoteproc in LockStep mode, and as two remoteprocs in Split mode. The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these cores. IPC between the A53 cores and the R5 cores is supported through the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes. The AM65x SoCs typically have a single R5FSS in the MCU voltage domain. The J721E SoCs uses a slightly revised IP and typically have three R5FSSs, with one cluster present within the MCU voltage domain (MCU_R5FSS0), and the remaining two clusters present in the MAIN voltage domain (MAIN_R5FSS0 and MAIN_R5FSS1). The integration of these clusters on J721E SoC is also slightly different in that these IPs do support an actual local reset line, while they are a no-op on AM65x SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 16 + drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 1346 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 1363 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig index de3862c15fcc..073048b4c0fb 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig @@ -224,6 +224,22 @@ config STM32_RPROC This can be either built-in or a loadable module. +config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC + tristate "TI K3 R5 remoteproc support" + depends on ARCH_K3 + select MAILBOX + select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX + help + Say y here to support TI's R5F remote processor subsystems + on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote processor + framework. + + You want to say y here in order to offload some processing + tasks to these processors + + It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing + a slave processor + endif # REMOTEPROC endmenu diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index e30a1b15fbac..00ba826818af 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile @@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ qcom_wcnss_pil-y += qcom_wcnss_iris.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..655f8f14c37d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -0,0 +1,1346 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * TI K3 R5F (MCU) Remote Processor driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "omap_remoteproc.h" +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_proc.h" + +/* This address can either be for ATCM or BTCM with the other at address 0x0 */ +#define K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR 0x41010000 + +/* R5 TI-SCI Processor Configuration Flags */ +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_DBG_EN 0x00000001 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_DBG_NIDEN 0x00000002 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP 0x00000100 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TEINIT 0x00000200 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_NMFI_EN 0x00000400 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE 0x00000800 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN 0x00001000 +#define PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN 0x00002000 + +/* R5 TI-SCI Processor Control Flags */ +#define PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT 0x00000001 + +/* R5 TI-SCI Processor Status Flags */ +#define PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_WFE 0x00000001 +#define PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_WFI 0x00000002 +#define PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_CLK_GATED 0x00000004 +#define PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP_PERMITTED 0x00000100 + +/** + * struct k3_r5_mem - internal memory structure + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region + * @dev_addr: Device address from remoteproc view + * @size: Size of the memory region + */ +struct k3_r5_mem { + void __iomem *cpu_addr; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr; + size_t size; +}; + +enum cluster_mode { + CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT = 0, + CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP, +}; + +/** + * struct k3_r5_cluster - K3 R5F Cluster structure + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @mode: Mode to configure the Cluster - Split or LockStep + * @cores: list of R5 cores within the cluster + */ +struct k3_r5_cluster { + struct device *dev; + enum cluster_mode mode; + struct list_head cores; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_r5_core - K3 R5 core structure + * @elem: linked list item + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @rproc: rproc handle representing this core + * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @reset: reset control handle + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier + * @atcm_enable: flag to control ATCM enablement + * @btcm_enable: flag to control BTCM enablement + * @loczrama: flag to dictate which TCM is at device address 0x0 + */ +struct k3_r5_core { + struct list_head elem; + struct device *dev; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct k3_r5_mem *mem; + int num_mems; + struct reset_control *reset; + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; + u32 ti_sci_id; + u32 atcm_enable; + u32 btcm_enable; + u32 loczrama; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_r5_rproc - K3 remote processor state + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @cluster: cached pointer to parent cluster structure + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel + * @rproc: rproc handle + * @core: cached pointer to r5 core structure being used + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions + */ +struct k3_r5_rproc { + struct device *dev; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster; + struct mbox_chan *mbox; + struct mbox_client client; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct k3_r5_core *core; + struct k3_r5_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; +}; + +/** + * k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel + * @data: mailbox payload + * + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor, + * and we let remoteproc core handle it. + * + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices. + */ +static void k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_r5_rproc, + client); + struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent; + const char *name = kproc->rproc->name; + u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data); + + dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg); + + switch (msg) { + case RP_MBOX_CRASH: + /* + * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not + * supported. So, just log this for now + */ + dev_err(dev, "K3 R5F rproc %s crashed\n", name); + break; + case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY: + dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name); + break; + default: + /* silently handle all other valid messages */ + if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG) + return; + if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) { + dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg); + return; + } + /* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */ + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE) + dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg); + } +} + +/* kick a virtqueue */ +static void k3_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid; + int ret; + + /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n", + ret); +} + +static int k3_r5_split_reset(struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + int ret; + + ret = reset_control_assert(core->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + if (reset_control_deassert(core->reset)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + int ret; + + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = reset_control_deassert(core->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + if (core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) +{ + struct k3_r5_core *core; + int ret; + + /* assert local reset on all applicable cores */ + list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = reset_control_assert(core->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + core = list_prev_entry(core, elem); + goto unroll_local_reset; + } + } + + /* disable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ + list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto unroll_module_reset; + } + } + + return 0; + +unroll_module_reset: + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + core = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); +unroll_local_reset: + list_for_each_entry_from_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (reset_control_deassert(core->reset)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) +{ + struct k3_r5_core *core; + int ret; + + /* enable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ + list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + core = list_next_entry(core, elem); + goto unroll_module_reset; + } + } + + /* deassert local reset on all applicable cores */ + list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = reset_control_deassert(core->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto unroll_local_reset; + } + } + + return 0; + +unroll_local_reset: + list_for_each_entry_continue(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (reset_control_assert(core->reset)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "local-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + core = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); +unroll_module_reset: + list_for_each_entry_from(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(core->ti_sci, + core->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +static inline int k3_r5_core_halt(struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + return ti_sci_proc_set_control(core->tsp, + PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT, 0); +} + +static inline int k3_r5_core_run(struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + return ti_sci_proc_set_control(core->tsp, + 0, PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT); +} + +/* + * The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code + * execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run + * from the internal TCMs. This function is used to release the resets on + * applicable cores to allow loading into the TCMs. The .prepare() ops is + * invoked by remoteproc core before any firmware loading, and is followed + * by the .start() ops after loading to actually let the R5 cores run. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = cluster->mode ? k3_r5_lockstep_release(cluster) : + k3_r5_split_release(core); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable cores for TCM loading, ret = %d\n", + ret); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the + * resets on all applicable cores for the rproc device (depending on LockStep + * or Split mode). This completes the second portion of powering down the R5F + * cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the .stop() ops, and the + * .unprepare() ops is invoked by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is + * stopped. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = cluster->mode ? k3_r5_lockstep_reset(cluster) : + k3_r5_split_reset(core); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "unable to disable cores, ret = %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * The R5F start sequence includes two different operations + * 1. Configure the boot vector for R5F core(s) + * 2. Unhalt/Run the R5F core(s) + * + * The sequence is different between LockStep and Split modes. The LockStep + * mode requires the boot vector to be configured only for Core0, and then + * unhalt both the cores to start the execution - Core1 needs to be unhalted + * first followed by Core0. The Split-mode requires that Core0 to be maintained + * always in a higher power state that Core1 (implying Core1 needs to be started + * always only after Core0 is started). + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct k3_r5_core *core; + u32 boot_addr; + int ret; + + client->dev = dev; + client->tx_done = NULL; + client->rx_callback = k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback; + client->tx_block = false; + client->knows_txdone = false; + + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) { + ret = -EBUSY; + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox)); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now; + * there is no functional effect whatsoever. + * + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted. + */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret); + goto put_mbox; + } + + boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr; + /* TODO: add boot_addr sanity checking */ + dev_err(dev, "booting R5F core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr); + + /* boot vector need not be programmed for Core1 in LockStep mode */ + core = kproc->core; + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(core->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + /* unhalt/run all applicable cores */ + if (cluster->mode) { + list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = k3_r5_core_run(core); + if (ret) + goto unroll_core_run; + } + } else { + ret = k3_r5_core_run(core); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + } + + return 0; + +unroll_core_run: + list_for_each_entry_continue(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (k3_r5_core_halt(core)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "core halt back failed\n"); + } +put_mbox: + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + return ret; +} + +/* + * The R5F stop function includes the following operations + * 1. Halt R5F core(s) + * + * The sequence is different between LockStep and Split modes, and the order + * of cores the operations are performed are also in general reverse to that + * of the start function. The LockStep mode requires each operation to be + * performed first on Core0 followed by Core1. The Split-mode requires that + * Core0 to be maintained always in a higher power state that Core1 (implying + * Core1 needs to be stopped first before Core0). + * + * Note that the R5F halt operation in general is not effective when the R5F + * core is running, but is needed to make sure the core won't run after + * deasserting the reset the subsequent time. The asserting of reset can + * be done here, but is preferred to be done in the .unprepare() ops - this + * maintains the symmetric behavior between the .start(), .stop(), .prepare() + * and .unprepare() ops, and also balances them well between sysfs 'state' + * flow and device bind/unbind or module removal. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; + int ret; + + /* halt all applicable cores */ + if (cluster->mode) { + list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core); + if (ret) { + core = list_prev_entry(core, elem); + goto unroll_core_halt; + } + } + } else { + ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core); + if (ret) + goto out; + } + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + + return 0; + +unroll_core_halt: + list_for_each_entry_from_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + if (k3_r5_core_run(core)) + dev_warn(core->dev, "core run back failed\n"); + } +out: + return ret; +} + +/* + * Internal Memory translation helper + * + * Custom function implementing the rproc .da_to_va ops to provide address + * translation (device address to kernel virtual address) for internal RAMs + * present in a DSP or IPU device). The translated addresses can be used + * either by the remoteproc core for loading, or by any rpmsg bus drivers. + */ +static void *k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; + void __iomem *va = NULL; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr, offset; + size_t size; + int i; + + if (len == 0) + return NULL; + + /* handle both R5 and SoC views of ATCM and BTCM */ + for (i = 0; i < core->num_mems; i++) { + bus_addr = core->mem[i].bus_addr; + dev_addr = core->mem[i].dev_addr; + size = core->mem[i].size; + + /* handle R5-view addresses of TCMs */ + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = core->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + + /* handle SoC-view addresses of TCMs */ + if (da >= bus_addr && ((da + len) <= (bus_addr + size))) { + offset = da - bus_addr; + va = core->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { + dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->rmem[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static const struct rproc_ops k3_r5_rproc_ops = { + .prepare = k3_r5_rproc_prepare, + .unprepare = k3_r5_rproc_unprepare, + .start = k3_r5_rproc_start, + .stop = k3_r5_rproc_stop, + .kick = k3_r5_rproc_kick, + .da_to_va = k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va, +}; + +static const char *k3_r5_rproc_get_firmware(struct device *dev) +{ + const char *fw_name; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "firmware-name", + &fw_name); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + + return fw_name; +} + +static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct k3_r5_core *core0, *core, *temp; + u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0; + u32 set_cfg = 0, clr_cfg = 0; + u64 boot_vec = 0; + bool lockstep_en; + int ret; + + core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); + core = cluster->mode ? core0 : kproc->core; + + ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, + &stat); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + dev_dbg(dev, "boot_vector = 0x%llx, cfg = 0x%x ctrl = 0x%x stat = 0x%x\n", + boot_vec, cfg, ctrl, stat); + + lockstep_en = !!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP_PERMITTED); + if (!lockstep_en && cluster->mode) { + dev_err(cluster->dev, "lockstep mode not permitted, force configuring for split-mode\n"); + cluster->mode = 0; + } + + /* always enable ARM mode and set boot vector to 0 */ + boot_vec = 0x0; + if (core == core0) { + clr_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TEINIT; + /* + * LockStep configuration bit is Read-only on Split-mode _only_ + * devices and system firmware will NACK any requests with the + * bit configured, so program it only on permitted devices + */ + if (lockstep_en) + clr_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP; + } + + if (core->atcm_enable) + set_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN; + else + clr_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN; + + if (core->btcm_enable) + set_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN; + else + clr_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN; + + if (core->loczrama) + set_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE; + else + clr_cfg |= PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE; + + if (cluster->mode) { + /* + * work around system firmware limitations to make sure both + * cores are programmed symmetrically in LockStep. LockStep + * and TEINIT config is only allowed with Core0. + */ + list_for_each_entry(temp, &cluster->cores, elem) { + ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core); + if (ret) + goto out; + + if (temp != core) { + clr_cfg &= ~PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP; + clr_cfg &= ~PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TEINIT; + } + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(temp->tsp, boot_vec, + set_cfg, clr_cfg); + if (ret) + goto out; + } + + set_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP; + clr_cfg = 0; + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(core->tsp, boot_vec, + set_cfg, clr_cfg); + } else { + ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core); + if (ret) + goto out; + + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(core->tsp, boot_vec, + set_cfg, clr_cfg); + } + +out: + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct device_node *rmem_np; + struct reserved_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + int ret, i; + + num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", + sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_rmems <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "device does not have reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (num_rmems < 2) { + dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */ + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + num_rmems--; + kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->rmem) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto release_rmem; + } + + /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */ + for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) { + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1); + if (!rmem_np) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); + if (!rmem) { + of_node_put(rmem_np); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + of_node_put(rmem_np); + + kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base; + /* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */ + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base; + kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size; + kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size); + if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n", + i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems; + + return 0; + +unmap_rmem: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kfree(kproc->rmem); +release_rmem: + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev); + return ret; +} + +static void k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(kproc->rmem); + + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); +} + +static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc; + struct k3_r5_core *core, *core1; + struct device *cdev; + const char *fw_name; + struct rproc *rproc; + int ret; + + core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); + list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + cdev = core->dev; + fw_name = k3_r5_rproc_get_firmware(cdev); + if (IS_ERR(fw_name)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(fw_name); + goto out; + } + + rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev), &k3_r5_rproc_ops, + fw_name, sizeof(*kproc)); + if (!rproc) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + + /* K3 R5s have a Region Address Translator (RAT) but no MMU */ + rproc->has_iommu = false; + /* error recovery is not supported at present */ + rproc->recovery_disabled = true; + + kproc = rproc->priv; + kproc->cluster = cluster; + kproc->core = core; + kproc->dev = cdev; + kproc->rproc = rproc; + core->rproc = rproc; + + ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure(kproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "initial configure failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto err_config; + } + + ret = k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(kproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto err_config; + } + + ret = rproc_add(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_add; + } + + /* create only one rproc in lockstep mode */ + if (cluster->mode) + break; + } + + return 0; + +err_split: + rproc_del(rproc); +err_add: + k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); +err_config: + rproc_free(rproc); + core->rproc = NULL; +out: + /* undo core0 upon any failures on core1 in split-mode */ + if (!cluster->mode && core == core1) { + core = list_prev_entry(core, elem); + rproc = core->rproc; + kproc = rproc->priv; + goto err_split; + } + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc; + struct k3_r5_core *core; + struct rproc *rproc; + + /* + * lockstep mode has only one rproc associated with first core, whereas + * split-mode has two rprocs associated with each core, and requires + * that core1 be powered down first + */ + core = cluster->mode ? + list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem) : + list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); + + list_for_each_entry_from_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { + rproc = core->rproc; + kproc = rproc->priv; + + rproc_del(rproc); + + k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); + + rproc_free(rproc); + core->rproc = NULL; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + static const char * const mem_names[] = {"atcm", "btcm"}; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct resource *res; + int num_mems; + int i, ret; + + num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names); + core->mem = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_mems, sizeof(*core->mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!core->mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, + mem_names[i]); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n", + mem_names[i]); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res), + dev_name(dev))) { + dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n", + mem_names[i]); + ret = -EBUSY; + goto fail; + } + + /* + * TCMs are designed in general to support RAM-like backing + * memories. So, map these as Normal Non-Cached memories. This + * also avoids/fixes any potential alignment faults due to + * unaligned data accesses when using memcpy() or memset() + * functions (normally seen with device type memory). + */ + core->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res)); + if (IS_ERR(core->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n", mem_names[i]); + ret = PTR_ERR(core->mem[i].cpu_addr); + devm_release_mem_region(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res)); + goto fail; + } + core->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start; + + /* + * TODO: + * The R5F cores can place ATCM & BTCM anywhere in its address + * based on the corresponding Region Registers in the System + * Control coprocessor. For now, place ATCM and BTCM at + * addresses 0 and 0x41010000 (same as the bus address on AM65x + * SoCs) based on loczrama setting + */ + if (!strcmp(mem_names[i], "atcm")) { + core->mem[i].dev_addr = core->loczrama ? + 0 : K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR; + } else { + core->mem[i].dev_addr = core->loczrama ? + K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR : 0; + } + core->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + mem_names[i], &core->mem[i].bus_addr, + core->mem[i].size, core->mem[i].cpu_addr, + core->mem[i].dev_addr); + } + core->num_mems = num_mems; + + return 0; + +fail: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + devm_iounmap(dev, core->mem[i].cpu_addr); + devm_release_mem_region(dev, core->mem[i].bus_addr, + core->mem[i].size); + } + if (core->mem) + devm_kfree(dev, core->mem); + return ret; +} + +static +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) +{ + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + u32 temp[2]; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids", + temp, 2); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tsp) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + tsp->dev = dev; + tsp->sci = sci; + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops; + tsp->proc_id = temp[0]; + tsp->host_id = temp[1]; + + return tsp; +} + +static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct k3_r5_core *core; + int ret, ret1; + + core = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*core), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!core) + return -ENOMEM; + + core->dev = dev; + core->atcm_enable = 0; + core->btcm_enable = 1; + core->loczrama = 1; + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "atcm-enable", &core->atcm_enable); + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid format for atcm-enable, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_of; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "btcm-enable", &core->btcm_enable); + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid format for btcm-enable, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_of; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "loczrama", &core->loczrama); + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid format for loczrama, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_of; + } + + core->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci"); + if (IS_ERR(core->ti_sci)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(core->ti_sci); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n", + ret); + } + core->ti_sci = NULL; + goto err_of; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &core->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); + goto err_sci_id; + } + + core->reset = reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(core->reset)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(core->reset); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset handle, ret = %d\n", + ret); + } + goto err_sci_id; + } + + core->tsp = k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(dev, core->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(core->tsp)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n", + ret); + ret = PTR_ERR(core->tsp); + goto err_sci_proc; + } + + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(core->tsp); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_proc; + } + + ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(pdev, core); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get internal memories, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto err_intmem; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, core); + + return 0; + +err_intmem: + ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(core->tsp); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret1 = %d\n", ret1); +err_proc: + kfree(core->tsp); +err_sci_proc: + reset_control_put(core->reset); +err_sci_id: + ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(core->ti_sci); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1); +err_of: + devm_kfree(dev, core); + return ret; +} + +/* + * free the resources explicitly since driver model is not being used + * for the child R5F devices + */ +static int k3_r5_core_of_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_r5_core *core = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int i, ret; + + for (i = 0; i < core->num_mems; i++) { + devm_release_mem_region(dev, core->mem[i].bus_addr, + core->mem[i].size); + devm_iounmap(dev, core->mem[i].cpu_addr); + } + if (core->mem) + devm_kfree(dev, core->mem); + + ret = ti_sci_proc_release(core->tsp); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret); + + kfree(core->tsp); + reset_control_put(core->reset); + + ret = ti_sci_put_handle(core->ti_sci); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); + devm_kfree(dev, core); + + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_cluster_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct platform_device *cpdev; + struct device_node *child; + struct k3_r5_core *core, *temp; + int ret; + + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) { + cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child); + if (!cpdev) { + ret = -ENODEV; + dev_err(dev, "could not get R5 core platform device\n"); + goto fail; + } + + ret = k3_r5_core_of_init(cpdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_core_of_init failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + put_device(&cpdev->dev); + goto fail; + } + + core = platform_get_drvdata(cpdev); + put_device(&cpdev->dev); + list_add_tail(&core->elem, &cluster->cores); + } + + return 0; + +fail: + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(core, temp, &cluster->cores, elem) { + list_del(&core->elem); + cpdev = to_platform_device(core->dev); + if (k3_r5_core_of_exit(cpdev)) + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_core_of_exit cleanup failed\n"); + } + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_cluster_of_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct platform_device *cpdev; + struct k3_r5_core *core, *temp; + int ret; + + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(core, temp, &cluster->cores, elem) { + list_del(&core->elem); + cpdev = to_platform_device(core->dev); + ret = k3_r5_core_of_exit(cpdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_core_of_exit failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + break; + } + } + + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster; + int ret, ret1; + int num_cores; + + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cluster) + return -ENOMEM; + + cluster->dev = dev; + cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster->cores); + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "lockstep-mode", &cluster->mode); + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid format for lockstep-mode, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + num_cores = of_get_available_child_count(np); + if (num_cores != 2) { + dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled, num_cores = %d\n", + num_cores); + return -ENODEV; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); + + dev_dbg(dev, "creating child devices for R5F cores\n"); + ret = of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, dev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "of_platform_populate failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = k3_r5_cluster_of_init(pdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_cluster_of_init failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto fail_of; + } + + ret = k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(pdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto fail_rproc; + } + + return 0; + +fail_rproc: + ret1 = k3_r5_cluster_of_exit(pdev); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_cluster_of_exit failed, ret = %d\n", ret1); +fail_of: + of_platform_depopulate(dev); + return ret; +} + +static int k3_r5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + ret = k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(pdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit failed, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto fail; + } + + ret = k3_r5_cluster_of_exit(pdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "k3_r5_cluster_of_exit failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto fail; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "removing child devices for R5F cores\n"); + of_platform_depopulate(dev); + +fail: + return ret; +} + +static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,am654-r5fss", }, + { .compatible = "ti,j721e-r5fss", }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_r5_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver k3_r5_rproc_driver = { + .probe = k3_r5_probe, + .remove = k3_r5_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "k3_r5_rproc", + .of_match_table = k3_r5_of_match, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver(k3_r5_rproc_driver); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 R5F remote processor driver"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna "); From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:18 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456393 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA16613A4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7BF02070A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="YMBLK1k/"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="BCOA2Haf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C7BF02070A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=i8JnubW0tL+t+Q+wKyJzIkTySy7HbzxmPJNzniMDJGQ=; b=YMBLK1k/cjLogA v3+kLd61vXTP3uhpXSQLtpsnFr9XpdNTEJRUk0kFQkTuvRDmQuYaV+0lyAKdruopYu8zSmH9lnUpd IiA+iJL3jboulMntLi2arX61wuTLx/vAFSFAOGSuq8b3tXEkLzID8mx82aneCQJ7NqxNllFcJ0sFn jYxl9XXaHjAXxWBPlqS7oJsbhYIpSMecLlELzPyDIJYx97YU8q33aqjjfKFQ/gDMpdjXBcVna7ov2 7P9Oy1fExREHJvXkwp7rQ1KGTb9xFTXPmF6D5dBzSojFgKAJkOa2CCBq+Kc5dOWU/JEG48r4zua9Y cGd6KA+2/6i/wWGxDO7g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq1Y-0004Z0-E7; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:44 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0Q-0003Mg-2p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:36 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIWFr089263; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081112; bh=KBK4nAkGYfaW/z7wnAp3kL3aRKdiM3zDk7Y34dWImPM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=BCOA2Haf/SkSB1hh68ZQJx+5tIZf56DEPfY9szr5oW/ZUVEF47U+00yzBXi18Del+ U4AY8hSHMC8Udlvl6xwC3vUzAUEJHHh1APGT0MQKHcM7RnvPkxCbiXdgzKuQsH98Q2 klTUgZgNUD6+1PG8AnYfpvr7JHRQNGaFqj/Yzz08= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02OKIWI6015823 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:32 -0500 Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:31 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:31 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIVIW071981; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIVML084995; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:31 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 6/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Initialize TCM memories for ECC Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-7-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131834_234941_7E8564BD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.33 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The R5F processors on K3 SoCs all have two TCMs (ATCM and BTCM) that support 32-bit ECC. The TCMs are typically loaded with some boot-up code to initialize the R5 MPUs to further execute code out of DDR. The ECC for the TCMs is enabled by default on K3 SoCs due to internal default tie-off values, but the TCM memories are not initialized on device power up. Any read access without the corresponding TCM memory location initialized will generate an ECC error, and any such access from a A72 or A53 core will trigger a SError. So, zero initialize both the TCM memories before loading any firmware onto a R5F in remoteproc mode. Any R5F booted from U-Boot/SPL would require a similar initialization in the bootloader. Note that both the TCMs are initialized unconditionally as the TCM enable config bits only manage the access and visibility from R5. The Core1 TCMs are not used and accessible in LockStep mode, so they are only initialized in Split-mode. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index 655f8f14c37d..8c9b7ae5d8b7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -366,6 +366,17 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) dev_err(dev, "unable to enable cores for TCM loading, ret = %d\n", ret); + /* + * Zero out both TCMs unconditionally (access from v8 Arm core is not + * affected by ATCM & BTCM enable configuration values) so that ECC + * can be effective on all TCM addresses. + */ + dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out ATCM memory\n"); + memset(core->mem[0].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[0].size); + + dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out BTCM memory\n"); + memset(core->mem[1].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[1].size); + return ret; } From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:18:19 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11456395 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECF8913 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5382070A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VRxcqNE7"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="S3lGOy1o" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0E5382070A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+byUBFk46RgkDNFSStc0SKrgZsYIbpPq9r6oPFg41ac=; b=VRxcqNE7vepPR6 zWzfnUAHmgJ/uU1iL5k31bZq2cFNAiAUjAqhubrCLxF2H49cq/a0zFnHQzs/aOmVcoZ2kLX64TdMq fWyHzm7/OF4aYExIKLG996NnQ5MeqAE2E4cBHY1Z6wdRWMZkMyvtgGeIxr7MgsxwTcBu8tRb7e0Q1 Bx/PaTIU9UYeSS+juBULv1srX9xxs6r+v1dUq+UCarfBMLTO4Pu2ThzXdXWXSdwDZQpQUbpnu8+eS 0a+JHka9VKHPpq+xEjL2AwYOEh0jJlpSotmxDE65y3ixabTDI+1oQPHu+XwDk0/alH7FwpCQsOQiq S2OKzjrD/fL+stzwl3mw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq1l-0004mb-DK; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:19:57 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jGq0S-0003Nn-El for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:18:38 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIXkY039621; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585081113; bh=rgcK0izV60vaMgOYTwIlec7ZHpQ6A2jrrTou43/lA6E=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=S3lGOy1olcbdIpBpppcydK7E44YzT0jssboimdq/4q7x9+PsNW230ogzxkIWVK99L 5m8FWf8BrfuXL69jyax0CYue7xPaul7uXtg2oTUFzPtDWGW5MkEzJCAymmyZjHsmEc 7a4KcaLuhNrRXrao9VNlsBtUsinzfYCpoazMiPOE= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02OKIXI3065754 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:33 -0500 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:32 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02OKIWb4113597; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:32 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02OKIWI1085001; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:32 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 7/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add loading support for on-chip SRAM regions Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20200324201819.23095-8-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200324201819.23095-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200324_131836_610576_1070D3F7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.93 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The K3 SoCs has various internal on-chip SRAM memories like the SRAM within the MCU domain or the shared MSMC RAM within NavSS that can be used for multiple purposes. One such purpose is to have the R5F cores use a portion of such on-chip SRAM for fast-access data or to directly execute code. Add support to the K3 R5 remoteproc driver to parse and support loading into such memories. The SRAM regions need to be mapped as normal non-cacheable memory to avoid kernel crashes when the remoteproc loader code uses the Arm64 memset library function (the "DC ZVA" instruction throws a alignment fault on device type memory). These SRAM regions are completely optional as not all firmware images require these memories, and any such memory has to be reserved as such in the DTS files. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index 8c9b7ae5d8b7..0ae0b66ec9eb 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ struct k3_r5_cluster { * @dev: cached device pointer * @rproc: rproc handle representing this core * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @sram: on-chip SRAM memory regions data * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @num_sram: number of on-chip SRAM memory regions * @reset: reset control handle * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle @@ -99,7 +101,9 @@ struct k3_r5_core { struct device *dev; struct rproc *rproc; struct k3_r5_mem *mem; + struct k3_r5_mem *sram; int num_mems; + int num_sram; struct reset_control *reset; struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; @@ -585,6 +589,18 @@ static void *k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } } + /* handle any SRAM regions using SoC-view addresses */ + for (i = 0; i < core->num_sram; i++) { + dev_addr = core->sram[i].dev_addr; + size = core->sram[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = core->sram[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; @@ -1017,6 +1033,77 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, return ret; } +static int k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *sram_np; + struct resource res; + int num_sram; + int i, ret; + + num_sram = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "sram", sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_sram <= 0) { + dev_dbg(dev, "device does not use reserved on-chip memories, num_sram = %d\n", + num_sram); + return 0; + } + + core->sram = kcalloc(num_sram, sizeof(*core->sram), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!core->sram) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_sram; i++) { + sram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "sram", i); + if (!sram_np) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } + + if (!of_device_is_available(sram_np)) { + of_node_put(sram_np); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } + + ret = of_address_to_resource(sram_np, 0, &res); + of_node_put(sram_np); + if (ret) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } + core->sram[i].bus_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].dev_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].size = resource_size(&res); + core->sram[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(res.start, + resource_size(&res)); + if (!core->sram[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse and map sram%d memory at %pad\n", + i, &res.start); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto fail; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory sram%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i, &core->sram[i].bus_addr, + core->sram[i].size, core->sram[i].cpu_addr, + core->sram[i].dev_addr); + } + core->num_sram = num_sram; + + return 0; + +fail: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + if (core->sram[i].cpu_addr) + iounmap(core->sram[i].cpu_addr); + } + kfree(core->sram); + + return ret; +} + static struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) @@ -1048,7 +1135,7 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; struct k3_r5_core *core; - int ret, ret1; + int ret, ret1, i; core = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*core), GFP_KERNEL); if (!core) @@ -1125,10 +1212,23 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_intmem; } + ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(pdev, core); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get sram memories, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err_sram; + } + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, core); return 0; +err_sram: + for (i = 0; i < core->num_mems; i++) { + devm_iounmap(dev, core->mem[i].cpu_addr); + devm_release_mem_region(dev, core->mem[i].bus_addr, + core->mem[i].size); + } + devm_kfree(dev, core->mem); err_intmem: ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(core->tsp); if (ret1) @@ -1156,6 +1256,10 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_exit(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; int i, ret; + for (i = 0; i < core->num_sram; i++) + iounmap(core->sram[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(core->sram); + for (i = 0; i < core->num_mems; i++) { devm_release_mem_region(dev, core->mem[i].bus_addr, core->mem[i].size);