From patchwork Wed Mar 25 20:18:37 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11458575 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A9314B4 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509B520740 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="UiMVZwWb"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="d+RZYVj0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 509B520740 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=x593u6Stc623is6g3YXv/5t16Pw1qQOw1U4rAzvKTlQ=; b=UiMVZwWbK9BZr4 bGVyB95WTPZYtg6tM+zkPUDWzgo0MlsXrPJQPBmqVW9MIco2gaXHeZJvwYvuPqL7cMFEkQoSk+jGc q3wnIjdsy1JnaYTnGP8OWYxpuABh92egnChh+OOf9szelVRHv6zhOIOlXKy/zIl5V++5psPj2egc2 bP2z6k+wqbd8Wl9PdG34yQVhRTgrCVyPz4MxKo2CrhUc1VsG/WS0jTnpEuLFpCZ9o3ikicHKhJgzf Yojab7k6MDjujp5/+qADfakKyKKtwHfCFXEEM1C5T//5cnccZ05Q3nHkZhScCSgf/3s9n9nENyMgf OiGy2d+IsXKwh8XQ+/TA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCUL-00006C-5y; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:18:57 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCUH-0008WM-Re for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:18:55 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKIj6j085839; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585167525; bh=YWnbA9p3RGUrjpZGEuExQ7ejQ8cGZmK3O4zvWi+b1+8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=d+RZYVj0RwSPPge/qLJk4R6+yDy3WaPygHYxDbfzOGyWaEidrnA2sSZImU8CRS1I4 agwEpd5MguGvf8ARG05JShVCLXYZrCjEHIdTcsn+Q/ZCginBvn/h+h2WfT5q57z0mq 4bn8Vz6HrmGCbkx/3Lr1iJpsSOjzLyMTN6zLKY3g= Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (dlee114.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKIjJN019777; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKIjws098090; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02PKIjHl090856; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:45 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20200325201839.15896-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200325_131854_027661_46A313C3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.04 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.248 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem. Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml | 180 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..416e3abe7937 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: TI K3 DSP devices + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems + that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms, + for achieving various system level goals. + + These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like + L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory + controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor + cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a + TMS320C71x CorePac processor. + + Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a + number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the + host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote + processor and to communicate with the remote processor. + +properties: + compatible: + const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp + description: + Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs + + reg: + description: | + Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'. + Each entry should have the memory region's start address + and the size of the region, the representation matching + the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values. + minItems: 3 + maxItems: 3 + + reg-names: + description: | + Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal + internal memory regions, and should be defined in this order + maxItems: 3 + items: + - const: l2sram + - const: l1pram + - const: l1dram + + ti,sci: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle + description: + Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node + + ti,sci-dev-id: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: | + Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the DSP core. + Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation + for valid values for the DSP cores. + + ti,sci-proc-ids: + description: Should contain a single tuple of . + allOf: + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix + - maxItems: 1 + items: + items: + - description: TI-SCI processor id for the DSP core device + - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control + ownership should be transferred to + + resets: + description: | + Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node + managing the resets for this device, and a reset + specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings + for the reset argument specifier, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt + + firmware-name: + description: | + Should contain the name of the default firmware image + file located on the firmware search path + + mboxes: + description: | + OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for + communication with the remote processor. This property should match + with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The specifier + format is as per the bindings, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt + + memory-region: + minItems: 2 + description: | + phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc + device. There should be atleast two reserved memory nodes defined - the + first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring + buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image sections. The + reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as + per the bindings in + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt + +# Optional properties: +# -------------------- + + sram: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array + minItems: 1 + description: | + pHandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions + should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and + should be defined as per the generic bindings in, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - reg-names + - ti,sci + - ti,sci-dev-id + - ti,sci-proc-ids + - resets + - firmware-name + - mboxes + - memory-region + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + + //Example: J721E SoC + /* DSP Carveout reserved memory nodes */ + reserved-memory { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + c66_0_dma_memory_region: c66-dma-memory@a6000000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0xa6000000 0x00 0x100000>; + no-map; + }; + + c66_0_memory_region: c66-memory@a6100000 { + compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; + reg = <0x00 0xa6100000 0x00 0xf00000>; + no-map; + }; + }; + + cbass_main: interconnect@100000 { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */ + <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */ + + /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */ + c66_0: dsp@4d80800000 { + compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp"; + reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>, + <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>, + <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>; + reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram"; + ti,sci = <&dmsc>; + ti,sci-dev-id = <142>; + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>; + resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>; + firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw"; + memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>, + <&c66_0_memory_region>; + mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>; + }; + }; From patchwork Wed Mar 25 20:18:38 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11458581 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A79514B4 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076BD20774 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="DFmVUo2N"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="od0fao4w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 076BD20774 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1w9+8FAKIVFk8Zx4Buap/L6pCpDqczLEdg95TlRhyTI=; b=DFmVUo2Nkr2Gmb 55JBQnR9+JLIT0eyb0ZjkRa2E1saUyiXErpFHnC3ZG9BCzdl/aFp6EEEUBqba4HVVhP4qOiVGOf0N fFIdSNIOc17ZlKWiSO9eYWr8x/XYw09KRkdBUtTcNjnwmUJSLUbszSiw9vAmGWWN7Bgdn57FN9mTz yo+uWn1wUb8wqu6Cyx+vYICzTtzkl+9AlwhmkEplZ+ofysWRTv1ul29DOEi1jhoHHDOpewNNvlXcf TTseAtIovkGKiJOQDQhcKCnaR/873Vwo/Oof14jH1xbbpyqkulB5wwodp92PybpyPjyUmOCBi0PoE KX2P0X6YVV1e0L0suMsQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCUb-0000JG-08; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:13 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCUH-0008WP-KT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:18:56 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKImB6004735; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585167528; bh=VslfyFjtG1Kf7D27c+ZPgs6ntscxFVCF/M82uvFVYxY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=od0fao4w5w5CBoIOTlm7jr5XWjUh7GYpPDvE42xTE6GvSggblJBU25Y8/lmyHHEmu td2oQY26DzAU/keh7y0F8cXfCSh9KfqfJe7GqOe5QUCpTOEumZ7NU/Jzb0sy9XxSIm zNRy3wvSjhTFZXHyhci22ORqY8vQZWorMCTzyuyQ= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02PKImHN010810 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKImIU028510; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02PKImEL090864; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20200325201839.15896-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200325_131853_786178_5FC191A3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.24 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA), External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown Controller (PDC). A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB. Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported. The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers. The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout regions will be errored out. The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 16 + drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 736 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 753 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig index 073048b4c0fb..66a76acb15b6 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig @@ -240,6 +240,22 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing a slave processor +config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC + tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support" + depends on ARCH_K3 + select MAILBOX + select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX + help + Say y here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor + subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote + processor framework. + + You want to say m here in order to offload some processing + tasks to these processors. + + It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing + the DSP slave processors. + endif # REMOTEPROC endmenu diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index 00ba826818af..eb51cc09e47b 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile @@ -29,3 +29,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..fd0d84f46f90 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -0,0 +1,736 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "omap_remoteproc.h" +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_proc.h" + +#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK (SZ_16M - 1) + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem - internal memory structure + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view + * @size: Size of the memory region + */ +struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem { + void __iomem *cpu_addr; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr; + size_t size; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP + * @name: name for this memory entry + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry + */ +struct k3_dsp_mem_data { + const char *name; + const u32 dev_addr; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management + */ +struct k3_dsp_dev_data { + const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems; + u32 num_mems; + u32 boot_align_addr; + bool uses_lreset; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle + * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions + * @reset: reset control handle + * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel + */ +struct k3_dsp_rproc { + struct device *dev; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem *mem; + int num_mems; + struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + struct reset_control *reset; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; + u32 ti_sci_id; + struct mbox_chan *mbox; + struct mbox_client client; +}; + +/** + * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel + * @data: mailbox payload + * + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor, + * and we let remoteproc core handle it. + * + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc, + client); + struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent; + const char *name = kproc->rproc->name; + u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data); + + dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg); + + switch (msg) { + case RP_MBOX_CRASH: + /* + * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not + * supported. So, just log this for now + */ + dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name); + break; + case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY: + dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name); + break; + default: + /* silently handle all other valid messages */ + if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG) + return; + if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) { + dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg); + return; + } + /* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */ + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE) + dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg); + } +} + +/* + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages. + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register), + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid; + int ret; + + /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n", + ret); +} + +/* Put the DSP processor into reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset)) + dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* Release the DSP processor from reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Power up the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements + * were met. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + u32 boot_addr; + int ret; + + client->dev = dev; + client->tx_done = NULL; + client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback; + client->tx_block = false; + client->knows_txdone = false; + + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) { + ret = -EBUSY; + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox)); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now; + * there is no functional effect whatsoever. + * + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted. + */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret); + goto put_mbox; + } + + boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr; + if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n", + boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto put_mbox; + } + + dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr); + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + return 0; + +put_mbox: + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + return ret; +} + +/* + * Stop the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing + * of any pending messages. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a + * kernel virtual address. The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal + * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these + * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses + * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel + * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers. + */ +static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + void __iomem *va = NULL; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr, offset; + size_t size; + int i; + + if (len == 0) + return NULL; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) { + bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr; + dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->mem[i].size; + + if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) { + /* handle DSP-view addresses */ + if (da >= dev_addr && + ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } else { + /* handle SoC-view addresses */ + if (da >= bus_addr && + (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) { + offset = da - bus_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + } + + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { + dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->rmem[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, + .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, + .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, + .da_to_va = k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va, +}; + +static const char *k3_dsp_rproc_get_firmware(struct device *dev) +{ + const char *fw_name; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "firmware-name", + &fw_name); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + + return fw_name; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct resource *res; + int num_mems = 0; + int i; + + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems; + kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems, + sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, + data->mems[i].name); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res), + dev_name(dev))) { + dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EBUSY; + } + + kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res)); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start; + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr; + kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr); + + /* zero out memories to start in a pristine state */ + /* + * FIXME: comment out until kernel crash is fixed, possible + * issue with local resets. + * memset((__force void *)kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr, 0, + * kproc->mem[i].size); + */ + } + kproc->num_mems = num_mems; + + return 0; +} + +static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct device_node *rmem_np; + struct reserved_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + int ret, i; + + num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", + sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_rmems <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (num_rmems < 2) { + dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */ + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + num_rmems--; + kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->rmem) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto release_rmem; + } + + /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */ + for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) { + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1); + if (!rmem_np) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); + if (!rmem) { + of_node_put(rmem_np); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + of_node_put(rmem_np); + + kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base; + /* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */ + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base; + kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size; + kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size); + if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n", + i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems; + + return 0; + +unmap_rmem: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kfree(kproc->rmem); +release_rmem: + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); + return ret; +} + +static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(kproc->rmem); + + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); +} + +static +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) +{ + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + u32 temp[2]; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids", + temp, 2); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tsp) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + tsp->dev = dev; + tsp->sci = sci; + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops; + tsp->proc_id = temp[0]; + tsp->host_id = temp[1]; + + return tsp; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc; + struct rproc *rproc; + const char *fw_name; + int ret = 0; + int ret1; + + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); + if (!data) + return -ENODEV; + + fw_name = k3_dsp_rproc_get_firmware(dev); + if (IS_ERR(fw_name)) + return PTR_ERR(fw_name); + + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name, + sizeof(*kproc)); + if (!rproc) + return -ENOMEM; + + rproc->has_iommu = false; + rproc->recovery_disabled = true; + kproc = rproc->priv; + kproc->rproc = rproc; + kproc->dev = dev; + kproc->data = data; + + kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci"); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n", + ret); + } + kproc->ti_sci = NULL; + goto free_rproc; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset); + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n", + ret); + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp); + goto put_sci; + } + + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto free_tsp; + } + + pm_runtime_enable(dev); + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock, status = %d\n", ret); + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); + goto disable_rpm; + } + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc); + if (ret) + goto disable_clk; + + ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto disable_clk; + } + + ret = rproc_add(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc); + + return 0; + +release_mem: + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); +disable_clk: + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev); +disable_rpm: + pm_runtime_disable(dev); + ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_tsp: + kfree(kproc->tsp); +put_sci: + ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_rproc: + rproc_free(rproc); + return ret; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + rproc_del(kproc->rproc); + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); + + ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret); + + kfree(kproc->tsp); + + ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret); + + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); + rproc_free(kproc->rproc); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = { + { .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 }, + { .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 }, + { .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 }, +}; + +static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = { + .mems = c66_mems, + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems), + .boot_align_addr = SZ_1K, + .uses_lreset = true, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = { + .probe = k3_dsp_rproc_probe, + .remove = k3_dsp_rproc_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "k3-dsp-rproc", + .of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna "); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver"); From patchwork Wed Mar 25 20:18:39 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11458585 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF67B92A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D95E20740 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="n2ttB2Vs"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="A372TIB2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D95E20740 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=pz7+XnqNff1DKZUnksvYbpnf8/4fYKp9IcoDNYiF3fc=; b=n2ttB2VsLjw/6m qFaMWvDMoaX0l2mnDDP4KJlVf128O/NoUua5m8I8YdtaLwxp/QPWNzbr3p2+ndVAMIOMnUMTnR5lk BhUqvoms6hj2KgXDqaAwyoDR1Xhi1GdW56l3ys/YCs0n71VWNKbMAjZWPYRH0Ve8OqtrjI7kByV66 6GzV1LjsP9e5zFSy8gkyug8C+boIWkh16WBQPUsHfQdgalXkHsUT/9I+VWRB/qha7rg8QvblSNERd 5hMQwO9uque5YuoOrUUiQtgmSZxex9LPc399Q1P4Z/vYJtgdXzNyzv4LO347EaebOU85WWBwm4NZt BVpv68Uqw9VxB0M9BcEg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCV5-0000oO-0n; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:19:43 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jHCUI-0008WT-AB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:18:57 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKInxn053430; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585167529; bh=h6Y7kKyK0HpFuOURmmpiDpmaMkeTeq/m6EYhOH7YPZc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=A372TIB2G5ZkXvyo7xBTZU1Zk7HYMLTJN1K7MEMmVnYkGCtZpoalqEfv6b4+2L6Ak /KCkZQe3iHabYULf9HIUIn7Vh9oqQZD8Iqk+Iy9lno8fEy+X3qYHI3WsgIA5CfFD74 AaXtmPIFfkkhG2GqOPki9cKxNQPy4R8L16rlP8MY= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02PKIndn010823 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:49 -0500 Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:49 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:48 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02PKInIi064382; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:49 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.35.147]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 02PKInUQ090870; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:49 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:18:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20200325201839.15896-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200325201839.15896-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200325_131854_434484_9DE35977 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.35 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems. The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine. Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c index fd0d84f46f90..7b712ef74611 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + return ret; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -192,6 +195,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) struct device *dev = kproc->dev; int ret; + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + goto lreset; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -199,6 +205,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +lreset: ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -210,6 +217,63 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +/* + * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is + * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to + * actually let the C66x DSP cores run. The local reset on C71x cores is a + * no-op and the global reset cannot be released on C71x cores until after + * the firmware images are loaded, so this function does nothing for C71x cores. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + /* local reset is no-op on C71x processors */ + if (!kproc->data->uses_lreset) + return 0; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n", + ret); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the + * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of + * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global + * reset. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + /* local reset is no-op on C71x processors */ + if (!kproc->data->uses_lreset) + return 0; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + /* * Power up the DSP remote processor. * @@ -353,6 +417,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .prepare = k3_dsp_rproc_prepare, + .unprepare = k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare, .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, @@ -644,6 +710,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto disable_clk; } + /* + * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't + * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released. + */ + if (data->uses_lreset) { + ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } else if (ret == 0) { + dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n"); + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + } + } + ret = rproc_add(rproc); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",