From patchwork Tue May 12 15:55:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefan Berger X-Patchwork-Id: 11543485 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144D092A for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7DBB206DD for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7DBB206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXGH-0004mq-Mn for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:56:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXFV-0003oA-1K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:17 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:8198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXFU-000309-2P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04CFYc6h184972; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:14 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30wrvt78a0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:13 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 04CFYwX8187208; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:13 -0400 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30wrvt789e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:13 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04CFoAC0024184; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:12 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30wm56agwq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:12 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04CFtBBC51904886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:12 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2108B206B; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4179B2067; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Stefan Berger To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL v3 1/1] hw/tpm: fix usage of bool in tpm-tis.c Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:55:05 -0400 Message-Id: <20200512155505.1703590-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200512155505.1703590-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200512155505.1703590-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-12_04:2020-05-11, 2020-05-12 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005120117 Received-SPF: none client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/12 10:56:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Thomas Huth , Jafar Abdi , Stefan Berger Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Jafar Abdi Clean up wrong usage of FALSE and TRUE in places that use "bool" from stdbool.h. FALSE and TRUE (with capital letters) are the constants defined by glib for being used with the "gboolean" type of glib. But some parts of the code also use TRUE and FALSE for variables that are declared as "bool" (the type from ). Signed-off-by: Jafar Abdi Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger --- hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c index 9ce64d4836..1af4bce139 100644 --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, while ((TPM_TIS_IS_VALID_LOCTY(s->active_locty) && locty > s->active_locty) || !TPM_TIS_IS_VALID_LOCTY(s->active_locty)) { - bool higher_seize = FALSE; + bool higher_seize = false; /* already a pending SEIZE ? */ if ((s->loc[locty].access & TPM_TIS_ACCESS_SEIZE)) { @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, /* check for ongoing seize by a higher locality */ for (l = locty + 1; l < TPM_TIS_NUM_LOCALITIES; l++) { if ((s->loc[l].access & TPM_TIS_ACCESS_SEIZE)) { - higher_seize = TRUE; + higher_seize = true; break; } }