From patchwork Tue May 19 11:41:28 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiongfeng Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 11557519 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0974213B1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF691207ED for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728705AbgESLsE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:48:04 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:4868 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728730AbgESLr5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:47:57 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BDB311AD85804D11C374; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:47:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:47:46 +0800 From: Xiongfeng Wang To: , , , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: change '.set_boost' to act on only one policy Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 19:41:28 +0800 Message-ID: <1589888489-13828-2-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1589888489-13828-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> References: <1589888489-13828-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Macro 'for_each_active_policy()' is defined internally. To avoid some cpufreq driver needing this macro to iterate over all the policies in '.set_boost' callback, we redefine '.set_boost' to act on only one policy and pass the policy as an argument. 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' iterate over all the policies to set boost for the system. This is preparation for adding SW BOOST support for CPPC. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 289e8ce..b0a9eb5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void boost_set_msr_each(void *p_en) boost_set_msr(enable); } -static int set_boost(int val) +static int set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int val) { get_online_cpus(); on_each_cpu(boost_set_msr_each, (void *)(long)val, 1); @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static ssize_t store_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf, if (ret || val > 1) return -EINVAL; - set_boost(val); + set_boost(policy, val); return count; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index d03f250..d0d86b1 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2532,34 +2532,29 @@ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) /********************************************************************* * BOOST * *********************************************************************/ -static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state) +static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy; - - for_each_active_policy(policy) { - int ret; - - if (!policy->freq_table) - return -ENXIO; + int ret; - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, - policy->freq_table); - if (ret) { - pr_err("%s: Policy frequency update failed\n", - __func__); - return ret; - } + if (!policy->freq_table) + return -ENXIO; - ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, policy->freq_table); + if (ret) { + pr_err("%s: Policy frequency update failed\n", __func__); + return ret; } + ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + return 0; } int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; @@ -2570,16 +2565,22 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state) cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = state; write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state); - if (ret) { - write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state; - write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - - pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", - __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable"); + for_each_active_policy(policy) { + ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state); + if (ret) + goto err_reset_state; } + return 0; + +err_reset_state: + write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); + cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state; + write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); + + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", + __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable"); + return ret; } diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 67d5950..3494f67 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver { /* platform specific boost support code */ bool boost_enabled; - int (*set_boost)(int state); + int (*set_boost)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state); }; /* flags */ From patchwork Tue May 19 11:41:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiongfeng Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 11557517 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA1C13B1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE3C207D3 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728853AbgESLsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:48:00 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:4867 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728798AbgESLr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:47:58 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B7585B6E4C3FA3958D6D; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:47:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:47:47 +0800 From: Xiongfeng Wang To: , , , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] CPPC: add support for SW BOOST Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 19:41:29 +0800 Message-ID: <1589888489-13828-3-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1589888489-13828-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> References: <1589888489-13828-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we need to get the max frequency of boost mode and non-boost mode. ACPI spec 6.2 section 8.4.7.1 describe the following two CPC registers. "Highest performance is the absolute maximum performance an individual processor may reach, assuming ideal conditions. This performance level may not be sustainable for long durations, and may only be achievable if other platform components are in a specific state; for example, it may require other processors be in an idle state. Nominal Performance is the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, assuming ideal operating conditions. In absence of an external constraint (power, thermal, etc.) this is the performance level the platform is expected to be able to maintain continuously. All processors are expected to be able to sustain their nominal performance state simultaneously." To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we can use Highest Performance as the max performance in boost mode and Nominal Performance as the max performance in non-boost mode. If the Highest Performance is greater than the Nominal Performance, we assume SW BOOST is supported. The current CPPC driver does not support SW BOOST and use 'Highest Performance' as the max performance the CPU can achieve. 'Nominal Performance' is used to convert 'performance' to 'frequency'. That means, if firmware enable boost and provide a value for Highest Performance which is greater than Nominal Performance, boost feature is enabled by default. Because SW BOOST is disabled by default, so, after this patch, boost feature is disabled by default even if boost is enabled by firmware. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index bda0b24..792ed9e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ * requested etc. */ static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data; +static bool boost_supported; struct cppc_workaround_oem_info { char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1]; @@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * Section 8.4.7.1.1.5 of ACPI 6.1 spec) */ policy->min = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf); - policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); /* * Set cpuinfo.min_freq to Lowest to make the full range of performance @@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * nonlinear perf */ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_perf); - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); policy->transition_delay_us = cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(cpu_num); policy->shared_type = cpu->shared_type; @@ -343,6 +344,13 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu->cur_policy = policy; + /* + * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost + * is supported. + */ + if (cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf > cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf) + boost_supported = true; + /* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */ policy->cur = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); @@ -410,6 +418,32 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0, fb_ctrs_t1); } +static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) +{ + struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata; + int ret = 0; + + if (!boost_supported) { + pr_err("BOOST not supported by CPU or firmware\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + cpudata = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + if (state) + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.highest_perf); + else + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; + + ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, .verify = cppc_verify_policy, @@ -417,6 +451,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) .get = cppc_cpufreq_get_rate, .init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init, .stop_cpu = cppc_cpufreq_stop_cpu, + .set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost, .name = "cppc_cpufreq", };