From patchwork Tue Jun 16 17:29:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz X-Patchwork-Id: 11608383 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BB192A for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89041214F1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731079AbgFPR3V (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:29:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729272AbgFPR3U (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:29:20 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421C4C061573; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: andrzej.p) with ESMTPSA id 4CE612A2C75 From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dmitry Torokhov , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Sylvain Lemieux , Laxman Dewangan , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Barry Song , Michael Hennerich , Nick Dyer , Hans de Goede , Sangwon Jee , Peter Hutterer , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Andrzej Pietrasiewicz , =?utf-8?b?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJv?= =?utf-8?b?c8WCYXc=?= , kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH] Input: document inhibiting Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:29:09 +0200 Message-Id: <20200616172909.21625-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <40988408-8f36-3a52-6439-34084de6b129@redhat.com> References: <40988408-8f36-3a52-6439-34084de6b129@redhat.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Document inhibiting input devices and its relation to being a wakeup source. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz --- @Hans, @Dmitry, My fist attempt at documenting inhibiting. Kindly look at it to see if I haven't got anything wrong. Andrzej Documentation/input/input-programming.rst | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst b/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst index 45a4c6e05e39..0cd1ad4504fb 100644 --- a/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst +++ b/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst @@ -164,6 +164,42 @@ disconnects. Calls to both callbacks are serialized. The open() callback should return a 0 in case of success or any nonzero value in case of failure. The close() callback (which is void) must always succeed. +Inhibiting input devices +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Inhibiting a device means ignoring input events from it. As such it is about maintaining +relationships with input handlers - either an already existing relationships, or +relationships to be established while the device is in inhibited state. + +If a device is inhibited, no input handler will receive events from it. + +The fact that nobody wants events from the device is exploited further, by calling device's +close() (if there are users) and open() (if there are users) on inhibit and uninhibit +operations, respectively. Indeed, the meaning of close() is to stop providing events +to the input core and that of open() is to start providing events to the input core. + +Inhibiting and uninhibiting is orthogonal to opening and closing the device by input +handlers. Userspace might want to inhibit a device in anticipation before any handler is +positively matched against it. + +Inhibiting and uninhibiting is orthogonal to device's being a wakeup source, too. Being a +wakeup source plays a role when the system is sleeping, not when the system is operating. +How drivers should program their interaction between inhibiting, sleeping and being a wakeup +source is driver-specific. + +Taking the analogy with the network devices - bringing a network interface down doesn't mean +that it should be impossible to be wake the system up on LAN through this interface. So, there +may be input drivers which should be considered wakeup sources even when inhibited. Actually, +in many i2c input devices their interrupt is declared a wakeup interrupt and its handling +happens in driver's core, which is not aware of input-specific inhibit (nor should it be). +Composite devices containing several interfaces can be inhibited on a per-interface basis and +e.g. inhibiting one interface shouldn't affect the device's capability of being a wakeup source. + +If a device is to be considered a wakeup source while inhibited, special care must be taken when +programming its suspend(), as it might need to call device's open(). Depending on what close() +means for the device in question not opening() it before going to sleep might make it impossible +to provide any wakeup events. The device is going to sleep anyway. + Basic event types ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~