From patchwork Tue Jun 23 19:50:39 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 11621673 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A640392A for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2CF214DB for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592942630; bh=97ur8RLnc6uZV2ZwBva1Z/GnkPnVj4yOtOwXI3V349k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=dkbpj2CGzLItKq2MdMYHiOEkV/0HP8TbMDS6quW0bQ5KjUribQJWEYgheCp4ETzE/ chmI481/BlzCr+KBRl++EhD5I6U7fuCeezJPghAmo6axyEiMlVVclnY43RHNNo0imY A5iNNJNKgkqAkFcP0F2JdNWKK8eWzIDwPX+Zr8zg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388096AbgFWUDt (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:03:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41708 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388104AbgFWUDs (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:03:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D64E2206C3; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:03:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592942627; bh=97ur8RLnc6uZV2ZwBva1Z/GnkPnVj4yOtOwXI3V349k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W3R8SorGbnp7S4FynSPjfO8zZdaFqqcj92WUvjGtXSGMoebZmQJ7wcTQEjOmZ9U0N G/iQbCPjn4vXt2xJ5ftZ8Z8exxZA4ywM4tx5xPgYGcSB0hpTfyu4JJbje5tkXHjiJn wfcNdLFd6gZ0Rn+wQ33ff1gkU/fbwC/dwC05F6QY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Paul Burton , Ralf Baechle , Arnd Bergmann , Long Cheng , Andy Shevchenko , Maxime Ripard , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Russell King , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.7 042/477] serial: 8250: Fix max baud limit in generic 8250 port Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:50:39 +0200 Message-Id: <20200623195409.597252000@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200623195407.572062007@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200623195407.572062007@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org From: Serge Semin [ Upstream commit 7b668c064ec33f3d687c3a413d05e355172e6c92 ] Standard 8250 UART ports are designed in a way so they can communicate with baud rates up to 1/16 of a reference frequency. It's expected from most of the currently supported UART controllers. That's why the former version of serial8250_get_baud_rate() method called uart_get_baud_rate() with min and max baud rates passed as (port->uartclk / 16 / UART_DIV_MAX) and ((port->uartclk + tolerance) / 16) respectively. Doing otherwise, like it was suggested in commit ("serial: 8250_mtk: support big baud rate."), caused acceptance of bauds, which was higher than the normal UART controllers actually supported. As a result if some user-space program requested to set a baud greater than (uartclk / 16) it would have been permitted without truncation, but then serial8250_get_divisor(baud) (which calls uart_get_divisor() to get the reference clock divisor) would have returned a zero divisor. Setting zero divisor will cause an unpredictable effect varying from chip to chip. In case of DW APB UART the communications just stop. Lets fix this problem by getting back the limitation of (uartclk + tolerance) / 16 maximum baud supported by the generic 8250 port. Mediatek 8250 UART ports driver developer shouldn't have touched it in the first place notably seeing he already provided a custom version of set_termios() callback in that glue-driver which took into account the extended baud rate values and accordingly updated the standard and vendor-specific divisor latch registers anyway. Fixes: 81bb549fdf14 ("serial: 8250_mtk: support big baud rate.") Signed-off-by: Serge Semin Cc: Alexey Malahov Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Paul Burton Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Long Cheng Cc: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Maxime Ripard Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Russell King Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506233136.11842-2-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c index f77bf820b7a30..4d83c85a7389b 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c @@ -2615,6 +2615,8 @@ static unsigned int serial8250_get_baud_rate(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios, struct ktermios *old) { + unsigned int tolerance = port->uartclk / 100; + /* * Ask the core to calculate the divisor for us. * Allow 1% tolerance at the upper limit so uart clks marginally @@ -2623,7 +2625,7 @@ static unsigned int serial8250_get_baud_rate(struct uart_port *port, */ return uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, port->uartclk / 16 / UART_DIV_MAX, - port->uartclk); + (port->uartclk + tolerance) / 16); } void