From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671463 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD721392 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E7C2074B for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="INfCCtq3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="vCqye4rH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9E7C2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eSSE91ufik/3/AF/HlQKWPm2ea3R8PPHcaeTzUJoo9s=; b=INfCCtq3HXuaJ+UMxo312obeB xmGQFBurx4JsF4PNT7ptE3uEdLWf/V9mty/BWHKMbG0ukcwnHe/Wp703cIXFP0y1zWGSrMfS0LqJF CVJdMs6b1B2KKTCelk/Gxg0qLfrEOkPiV87UDgV4zRyTrKe5GXOSWNFqKFXugEC9nM4YqLCoh+vHV tAVu9f2ik4+7Dz7q6vuPoZQ2mlsS7gCtIRBraiWvvCYSvAtpIcLFv1RpI0ar8Bb0PP7WjQd9hOOqk KCBgo3qo7u26UNXBu9zFrQMrZ0tSeABtqte9MN1CXLeT489PUkiIvCbQ+APTZWIz9ZsEa1JxoTbiz HgfMbq8Ig==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5T-0007Ms-Ib; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:19 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5K-0007Jp-Tt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:12 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm7PJ083783; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029687; bh=jHlH05tXGOLRwWsXUTZTLlAmGKwGHC7r1J05PDf0zoA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=vCqye4rHRTzTuGZJU9erSElVcIdYgoIZxjeQ1Lw6yUoAJnA5YoGyPaura7+jnel+M lzd1BUwb4u9dygXbEIjQmWvexvNoviAJ/9W8FmYhYABVKPx96tUxmdNt1gPJht3xtD INyOV4eyUV+kzZJuBx2gIQyPsSe1YBqeiYXRsdHw= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06HNm73P042654 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm662037411; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNm6ZI108262; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194811_094866_F0F73C5E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.58 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.248 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.23.248 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v4: No changes v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602327/ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init); +/** + * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name + * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc + * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval + * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware + * name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise. + * + * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for + * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer + * in @fw_name on success. + * + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure. + */ +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name) +{ + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name", + index, fw_name); + return ret ? ret : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware); + /* * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in * enum fw_resource_type. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { void rproc_release(struct kref *kref); irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, + const char **fw_name); /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id); From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:56 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671465 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9B81392 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB30E20717 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="1Y/cbFuE"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="pre8xIF5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB30E20717 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xGSpoIHANOL9AibyUrZ0dmQ8ETTpb0D1Uc1I3L5o7Ao=; b=1Y/cbFuEnJPZQ3yu/iszfr9TW uEG+upUyO0gNayJIEaH5Ok+vPutStS0blXKH8wYlg4rZNPG4TtKB//uhDTc5eRCWOiPyvzWu1exNY a6U8bAeHG5U5IFBalwafK8nc7iqBBehzxsvPFU9uJ7bjZzlwLCPctTDDHHVOQZPcU661KjgrSHs8L iI7kLURDzVjPniSlMJu+UEmPw811t6XNKtntLNINxgxeVYXRxUjHUc773Wu3q8DnCoERz92X91+tD 1rEljEBkiG+VCKf/9xsG1WhGZcKBVCJMKQDkc8fMn8hyh+bWq7OdEWWhrGdr0WRxOkU6umnMegMmU QHJe516Fw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5a-0007OH-AK; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:26 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5L-0007Js-RD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:14 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm8Eo083788; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029688; bh=dBbdibFIdBCx0Mutp6FXFLNYrk/vosrPh9OhpywEkk8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=pre8xIF5EnuO+MujSKhNYKgwhIlc69cAjl/+du62Y6ViMHEJaAk8jBvmUvAs45ELh LvztcVYEDkTJIPvnqL8u5kY+G74JDC3B45MPfEaOmmRZ7mtiMh/2NvLL/7iB0pTd7T ELDJjvX8PWgUd0Y8ZdKAO0XSd0LcsTuSQrXgabVg= Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (dfle112.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.33]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06HNm8Kb062222 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm7xu037434; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNm70N108271; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] remoteproc: k3: Add TI-SCI processor control helper functions Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194812_035618_D174B696 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.66 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.23.248 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.248 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Texas Instruments' K3 generation SoCs have specific modules/register spaces used for configuring the various aspects of a remote processor. These include power, reset, boot vector and other configuration features specific to each compute processor present on the SoC. These registers are managed by the System Controller such as DMSC on K3 AM65x SoCs. The Texas Instrument's System Control Interface (TI-SCI) Message Protocol is used to communicate to the System Controller from various compute processors to invoke specific services provided by the firmware running on the System Controller. Add a common processor control interface header file that can be used by multiple remoteproc drivers. The helper functions within this header file abstract the various TI SCI protocol ops for the remoteproc drivers, and allow them to request the System Controller to be able to program and manage various remote processors on the SoC. The remoteproc drivers are expected to manage the life-cycle of their ti_sci_proc_dev local structures. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v4: Addressed minor comments from Mathieu and picked up his Reviewed-by tag - Moved the ti_sci_protocol.h header file from driver to here - Replaced http with https - Appended my email address after the name v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602329/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..778558abcdcc --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Processor Controller Helper Functions + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H +#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H + +#include + +/** + * struct ti_sci_proc - structure representing a processor control client + * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle + * @ops: cached TI-SCI proc ops + * @dev: cached client device pointer + * @proc_id: processor id for the consumer remoteproc device + * @host_id: host id to pass the control over for this consumer remoteproc + * device + */ +struct ti_sci_proc { + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci; + const struct ti_sci_proc_ops *ops; + struct device *dev; + u8 proc_id; + u8 host_id; +}; + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_request(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->request(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor request failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_release(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->release(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor release failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_handover(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->handover(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor handover of %d to %d failed: %d\n", + tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id, ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_config(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 boot_vector, + u32 cfg_set, u32 cfg_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_config(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_set, cfg_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_config failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_control(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u32 ctrl_set, u32 ctrl_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_control(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, ctrl_set, ctrl_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_control failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_get_status(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 *boot_vector, u32 *cfg_flags, + u32 *ctrl_flags, u32 *status_flags) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->get_status(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_flags, ctrl_flags, status_flags); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor get_status failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H */ From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:57 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671467 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0CF138C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1517920704 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="D1VLAHoj"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="tv2tlwxx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1517920704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JzKO+6p/hZRrlFJ68Uu/MnNOiocJrUWXhhJBoMVrNpI=; b=D1VLAHojYDqFKD4Ram5Jo1gdm GMbqO9RmyVL7rtZMxgcBunfvNWyQnQQjLVBqJzaQaBX7OhyM3ZhCoaX9HDm341gxbG6YxZdakpHn0 DcziSlUFSKTX1k8ebspYcWpOdXAYOqdVRM2gQWUYwidQCUC34TN1w+YDk593rDCg8MBg9dC8FZOuo ArKKQd5bpFOWAWOlhVYm2ULSe9qgJpv1oAkDUBH9mTe3gHDCLsArgdLzCzsIS4SUdtzibvVaJTjCS AFTVP9HkHK1ziViunkv/N8+ZXc3mYN/NIGHYc+Im5csF3cMsrfC5413/UwDoHgYhX9OkRxfKGGi9O Oq9WJKZZg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5X-0007Nb-6k; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:23 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5L-0007Jw-Ht for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:13 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm9pl014576; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029689; bh=9KwCpesWJC8b9T9niJbSKws+xrNpUnloOyOKSNepTfw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=tv2tlwxxLc8YjtSW0iNq2bvigjGgLiF3/NAQD+tBNTpuzAHAR4J4/Ax7uWF+ehMLL wCE+3aTdRuKpbq+VANXwtYgdn+YUNh45Y5KQ7Q9GWIQB7zIIALUOZhtL8bFgGXGb0E qOMjatzFbK8p2zSJY8JygGatOB0yKhohpT0TiBYQ= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm9D0029922; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm8aX037476; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNm89T108280; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:08 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add common TI SCI rproc bindings Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194811_718671_E84ED1D1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.07 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [198.47.19.141 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a bindings document that lists the common TI SCI properties used by the K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc devices. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- v4: Addressed both of Rob's review comments on ti,sci-proc-ids property v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602317/ .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0dca2ffdbc48 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Common TI K3 remote processor device bindings + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more remote processor sub-systems + like the dual-core R5F sub-system or a C66x or C71x DSP processor subsystem. + The device management of these remote processors is managed by a dedicated + System Processor, and the communication with that processor is managed through + the TI-SCI protocol. + + Each remote processor device node should define a common set of properties + that allows the System Processor firmware to perform the device management + such as powering the IPs, asserting/deasserting the resets for each of these + processors. + +properties: + ti,sci: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle + description: + Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node + + ti,sci-dev-id: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: | + Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the remote processor + core. Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation + for valid values. + + ti,sci-proc-ids: + description: Should contain a single tuple of . + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array + items: + - description: TI-SCI processor id for the remote processor device + - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control ownership + should be transferred to + +required: + - ti,sci + - ti,sci-dev-id + - ti,sci-proc-ids From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:58 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671471 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C1D1751 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC7920717 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="J16169Js"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="ndmgo8xU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFC7920717 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WW91usHYiRNcaRdNpyEvOc6G4aYVZluv4G/nAvNQ4B4=; b=J16169Jskwtm8iVDSMdKmXlWV /PGss4aO25HuZ+r3R0g4nUYwmZJH769+kloQH1CvRygqMZZwIBTLfn3FUdVlRJKJDOD7WwmCy479O Aog6BKV69nIS5ncBAuI6RHKQ8YsnGnvmqzfkQRtyg6DhVqfRzb5bdujavlE5DYug3tCQNNnOw09Lj /ddoCN/+j7/vS2SVW9NQfWSysskNtwNuE9TPZGcuzMmvUL9WTz2EQu6DEfIEz1KuRkb8jZcJFZP3h VSHZxTYlOo+iu2P+LKTz4jRQAhY7wyvWJwr1Eomzg0LBMFOD553Km/Je6XosloMHsFBrgm2oLFLnd 9V8VffN6Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5e-0007PM-EC; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:30 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5M-0007KP-Az for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:15 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmAqb074558; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029690; bh=OdkjPeIdiBa8i+tjj3235y24tKPnNEZ0MO18ofpr6f4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ndmgo8xUUpKRCUqy1KPXFff2umWZTxkNltnlYD7TYKj7hiJoszR25dtsEkC0ptbXK gwISxs/DGOufeOq42iGNx5qSnvB8TCvqSeoGNFJJfvhBUA9KgMvXuH60dIhNMOvyFb qU2zuoGXQ/00eebm9XsBslsS9LL/G9a4yy7AL8CM= Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (dfle113.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.34]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06HNmAoa042736 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm9EM016608; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNm9f3108295; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:09 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-5-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194812_566489_531F63F3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.54 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.19.142 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem. Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- v4: No changes, picked up Rob's Reviewed-by tag v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602325/ .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f03e88c42a6e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: TI K3 DSP devices + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems + that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms, + for achieving various system level goals. + + These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like + L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory + controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor + cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a + TMS320C71x CorePac processor. + + Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a + number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the + host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote + processor and to communicate with the remote processor. + +allOf: + - $ref: "ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml#" + +properties: + compatible: + const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp + description: + Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs + + reg: + items: + - description: Address and Size of the L2 SRAM internal memory region + - description: Address and Size of the L1 PRAM internal memory region + - description: Address and Size of the L1 DRAM internal memory region + + reg-names: + items: + - const: l2sram + - const: l1pram + - const: l1dram + + resets: + description: | + Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node managing the + local resets for this device, and a reset specifier. + maxItems: 1 + + firmware-name: + description: | + Should contain the name of the default firmware image + file located on the firmware search path + + mboxes: + description: | + OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for + communication with the remote processor. This property should match + with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. + maxItems: 1 + + memory-region: + minItems: 2 + maxItems: 8 + description: | + phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc + device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes defined. The + reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as + per the bindings in + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt + items: + - description: region used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and + vring buffers + - description: region reserved for firmware image sections + additionalItems: true + +# Optional properties: +# -------------------- + + sram: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 4 + description: | + phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions + should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and + should be defined as per the generic bindings in, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - reg-names + - resets + - firmware-name + - mboxes + - memory-region + +unevaluatedProperties: false + +examples: + - | + / { + model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC"; + compatible = "ti,j721e"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + bus@100000 { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */ + <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */ + <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */ + + /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */ + dsp@4d80800000 { + compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp"; + reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>, + <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>, + <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>; + reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram"; + ti,sci = <&dmsc>; + ti,sci-dev-id = <142>; + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>; + resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>; + firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw"; + memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>, + <&c66_0_memory_region>; + mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>; + }; + }; + }; From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:59 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671473 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E1D1392 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020FC20704 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IZc0bGtA"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Biw8IJbk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 020FC20704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+6SZz59m229jjxkHTKgqVskhOVtP9f1NH1/C+UlZ83M=; b=IZc0bGtAidUEWpnp8WIMBME97 TM9QhRWIKiYY4NANHKqh7eaPHQuIpbKchcgDILFR/7U38cmm0m9Bjkm3I/szhPZ58wzpHdZNKrwxu fle5E2StPUdy+Wt6p25IqKl5t2V+Yl05zGn1UYy3nBbjcN8esZhvqB3fFQI5tD3Hi2UTHthk9/6mj SBMFQA8E0zVrJN9+Gr4lyHpFooRJibLkzEmGTUcmi51S2+ILv0sw79XCJSs9c8ryeVhpDKkvtmsY3 INPlQARwhpD2r5tzjItlbN9mRR0YdNIOLW6Ve4Cvu+4qvVEc1sa69iNuqaY6qdyFKa5kFICOIDrDQ rDTkZlvJg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5r-0007TK-9Q; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:43 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5M-0007L1-Hd for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:17 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmBFY014581; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029691; bh=1ZyIv3sWPz9BtXghPPfKkjg7Nn7wIRgfofW9gp+kDkk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Biw8IJbk85eXnkl340LfdelzskEu9KOl5Yr0CRf9zaT6VprH0hIFtdF3b77VJg3aL bV5nb2ZHUGlcmEwpcJeSTldoVPNpkE8BLs6x1y06vH4Lo1SQZ4EfVeYniz7l8GyS0o vAYtj5NGJwAgMnj7XH8aPDq9Ino+9jgZxgwmK5wQ= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06HNmATT042756 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmA4V016620; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNmAnD108309; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-6-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194812_779013_92A720F3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 33.58 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [198.47.19.141 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA), External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown Controller (PDC). A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB. Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported. The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers. The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout regions will be errored out. The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v4: Addressed the last minor comments from Mathieu - Removed the ti_sci_protocol.h header inclusion - Removed the unnecessary cpu_addr check in failure path in k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init() [following a similar comment on R5 driver) - Replaced http with https v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602319/ drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 699 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 713 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig index c4d1731295eb..74b818b25068 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig @@ -249,6 +249,19 @@ config STM32_RPROC This can be either built-in or a loadable module. +config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC + tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support" + depends on ARCH_K3 + select MAILBOX + select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX + help + Say m here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor + subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote + processor framework. + + It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing + the DSP slave processors. + endif # REMOTEPROC endmenu diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index e8b886e511f0..d457d0f87ada 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ qcom_wcnss_pil-y += qcom_wcnss_iris.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..18f714b012df --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -0,0 +1,699 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "omap_remoteproc.h" +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_proc.h" + +#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK (SZ_16M - 1) + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_mem - internal memory structure + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view + * @size: Size of the memory region + */ +struct k3_dsp_mem { + void __iomem *cpu_addr; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr; + size_t size; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP + * @name: name for this memory entry + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry + */ +struct k3_dsp_mem_data { + const char *name; + const u32 dev_addr; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management + */ +struct k3_dsp_dev_data { + const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems; + u32 num_mems; + u32 boot_align_addr; + bool uses_lreset; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle + * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions + * @reset: reset control handle + * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel + */ +struct k3_dsp_rproc { + struct device *dev; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct k3_dsp_mem *mem; + int num_mems; + struct k3_dsp_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + struct reset_control *reset; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; + u32 ti_sci_id; + struct mbox_chan *mbox; + struct mbox_client client; +}; + +/** + * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel + * @data: mailbox payload + * + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor, + * and we let remoteproc core handle it. + * + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc, + client); + struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent; + const char *name = kproc->rproc->name; + u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data); + + dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg); + + switch (msg) { + case RP_MBOX_CRASH: + /* + * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not + * supported. So, just log this for now + */ + dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name); + break; + case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY: + dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name); + break; + default: + /* silently handle all other valid messages */ + if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG) + return; + if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) { + dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg); + return; + } + /* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */ + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE) + dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg); + } +} + +/* + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages. + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register), + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid; + int ret; + + /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n", + ret); +} + +/* Put the DSP processor into reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset)) + dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* Release the DSP processor from reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Power up the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements + * were met. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + u32 boot_addr; + int ret; + + client->dev = dev; + client->tx_done = NULL; + client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback; + client->tx_block = false; + client->knows_txdone = false; + + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) { + ret = -EBUSY; + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox)); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now; + * there is no functional effect whatsoever. + * + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted. + */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret); + goto put_mbox; + } + + boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr; + if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n", + boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto put_mbox; + } + + dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr); + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + return 0; + +put_mbox: + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + return ret; +} + +/* + * Stop the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing + * of any pending messages. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a + * kernel virtual address. The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal + * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these + * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses + * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel + * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers. + */ +static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + void __iomem *va = NULL; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr, offset; + size_t size; + int i; + + if (len == 0) + return NULL; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) { + bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr; + dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->mem[i].size; + + if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) { + /* handle DSP-view addresses */ + if (da >= dev_addr && + ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } else { + /* handle SoC-view addresses */ + if (da >= bus_addr && + (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) { + offset = da - bus_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + } + + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { + dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->rmem[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, + .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, + .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, + .da_to_va = k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va, +}; + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct resource *res; + int num_mems = 0; + int i; + + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems; + kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems, + sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, + data->mems[i].name); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res), + dev_name(dev))) { + dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EBUSY; + } + + kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res)); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start; + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr; + kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_mems = num_mems; + + return 0; +} + +static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct device_node *rmem_np; + struct reserved_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + int ret, i; + + num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", + sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_rmems <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (num_rmems < 2) { + dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */ + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + num_rmems--; + kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->rmem) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto release_rmem; + } + + /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */ + for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) { + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1); + if (!rmem_np) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); + if (!rmem) { + of_node_put(rmem_np); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + of_node_put(rmem_np); + + kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base; + /* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */ + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base; + kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size; + kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size); + if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n", + i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems; + + return 0; + +unmap_rmem: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(kproc->rmem); +release_rmem: + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); + return ret; +} + +static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(kproc->rmem); + + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); +} + +static +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) +{ + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + u32 temp[2]; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids", + temp, 2); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tsp) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + tsp->dev = dev; + tsp->sci = sci; + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops; + tsp->proc_id = temp[0]; + tsp->host_id = temp[1]; + + return tsp; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc; + struct rproc *rproc; + const char *fw_name; + int ret = 0; + int ret1; + + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); + if (!data) + return -ENODEV; + + ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name, + sizeof(*kproc)); + if (!rproc) + return -ENOMEM; + + rproc->has_iommu = false; + rproc->recovery_disabled = true; + kproc = rproc->priv; + kproc->rproc = rproc; + kproc->dev = dev; + kproc->data = data; + + kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci"); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n", + ret); + } + kproc->ti_sci = NULL; + goto free_rproc; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset); + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n", + ret); + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp); + goto put_sci; + } + + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto free_tsp; + } + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc); + if (ret) + goto release_tsp; + + ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto release_tsp; + } + + ret = rproc_add(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc); + + return 0; + +release_mem: + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); +release_tsp: + ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_tsp: + kfree(kproc->tsp); +put_sci: + ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_rproc: + rproc_free(rproc); + return ret; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + rproc_del(kproc->rproc); + + ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret); + + kfree(kproc->tsp); + + ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret); + + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); + rproc_free(kproc->rproc); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = { + { .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 }, + { .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 }, + { .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 }, +}; + +static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = { + .mems = c66_mems, + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems), + .boot_align_addr = SZ_1K, + .uses_lreset = true, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = { + .probe = k3_dsp_rproc_probe, + .remove = k3_dsp_rproc_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "k3-dsp-rproc", + .of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna "); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver"); From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:48:00 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671469 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAA314E3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9721420704 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="wQNFn97v"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="nAggGv61" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9721420704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iVhZuCoGN83aF4dVq6GGwaMbH0oLBLc3HsUcDb1YOik=; b=wQNFn97vTKliZn9ueaAJmzMwB 3yaAs2Kz3gqFLnLeAG1EEN4Haqd/CQQs2bqPQizosV7+2l59VH4T/xpUDBTM1KKJNiaEgn3gjBjSN RA9clnlRmltgIqJYWQ3zijSFVRh7qtQGWQsy9S0Cc7FZnNTGNXO22N2SYdUulXVN/EpDV6SqeaJ5o Bm1AnOZv9HLjYhHKD7ZHEX5NOg90c5koLaat++ZrccK0kfxoITaBU7pSHOBYjRit0x8F3cWyASvc9 HE8IZTuqIbZAy+JN8CvZEI59RlbBPnFQyg50ceuWme+bvTyWkKrDHQrdEy1qtY3f4goMPBFqMhXEa Wnvkffr+g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5k-0007Qv-7U; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:36 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5N-0007LK-GG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:17 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmBMP013382; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029691; bh=jq4rgHcvJJ8L4v7IzJjoMyKc+IOd8AzBCxOmX0OsqdM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=nAggGv61x1G5J2XqEiM57YhQZkQDhm1lsM0/QjH3tL7fnhWz/9v56rWSNJvkFl/P9 jbWrB0/iAysU09bNjo8mPIow1pvaw7yVGneFCF5M8SEdla9FUzAT0HX+2h50fGM9Yr ZYFRgGifaez3SHz3q/ybW/bWfxlhUkz2/VlWqgdE= Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (dfle113.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.34]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmBAr029966; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:10 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNmBTt129102; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNmAmv108326; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:11 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-7-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194813_738828_09624606 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.35 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.249 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems. The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine. Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v4: No changes v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602323/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c index 18f714b012df..43566ead7a1d 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + return ret; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -191,6 +194,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) struct device *dev = kproc->dev; int ret; + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + goto lreset; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +lreset: ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -209,6 +216,53 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +/* + * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is + * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to + * actually let the C66x DSP cores run. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n", + ret); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the + * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of + * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global + * reset. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + /* * Power up the DSP remote processor. * @@ -352,6 +406,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .prepare = k3_dsp_rproc_prepare, + .unprepare = k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare, .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, @@ -612,6 +668,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto release_tsp; } + /* + * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't + * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released. + */ + if (data->uses_lreset) { + ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } else if (ret == 0) { + dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n"); + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + } + } + ret = rproc_add(rproc); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",