From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:06 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724331 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF86739 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D9120866 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 51D9120866 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 86B898D003B; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:14 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 81C2B8D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 733738D003B; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.89]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3018D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A479180AD806 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:14 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167611108.06.hat61_3112b1127028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE1E10051D5D for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30009:30012:30054:30080:30090,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.15.100 64.95.201.95;04y8zmkmu4ao7rn9cf3xfuuhcrzucopdapy64zm4sqjnn6nyq3ausuckkmjcx6j.1pieubohbokz5f46zxca3oywxbm13ej3s9gqo3hzzgxcndups5y8cimhiikkbgd.w-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:24,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: hat61_3112b1127028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6888 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf49.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EE166AAB4A298C799F77; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:53:09 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:53:09 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 1/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:06 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CDE1E10051D5D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Generic Initiators are a new ACPI concept that allows for the description of proximity domains that contain a device which performs memory access (such as a network card) but neither host CPU nor Memory. This patch has the parsing code and provides the infrastructure for an architecture to associate these new domains with their nearest memory processing node. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/base/node.c | 3 ++ include/linux/nodemask.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c index 15bbaab8500b..d27e8585132d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c @@ -130,6 +130,36 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header) } break; + case ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_AFFINITY: + { + struct acpi_srat_generic_affinity *p = + (struct acpi_srat_generic_affinity *)header; + + if (p->device_handle_type == 0) { + /* + * For pci devices this may be the only place they + * are assigned a proximity domain + */ + pr_debug("SRAT Generic Initiator(Seg:%u BDF:%u) in proximity domain %d %s\n", + *(u16 *)(&p->device_handle[0]), + *(u16 *)(&p->device_handle[2]), + p->proximity_domain, + (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GENERIC_AFFINITY_ENABLED) ? + "enabled" : "disabled"); + } else { + /* + * In this case we can rely on the device having a + * proximity domain reference + */ + pr_debug("SRAT Generic Initiator(HID=%.8s UID=%.4s) in proximity domain %d %s\n", + (char *)(&p->device_handle[0]), + (char *)(&p->device_handle[8]), + p->proximity_domain, + (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GENERIC_AFFINITY_ENABLED) ? + "enabled" : "disabled"); + } + } + break; default: pr_warn("Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n", header->type); @@ -332,6 +362,41 @@ acpi_parse_gicc_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, return 0; } +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) +static int __init +acpi_parse_gi_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, + const unsigned long end) +{ + struct acpi_srat_generic_affinity *gi_affinity; + int node; + + gi_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_generic_affinity *)header; + if (!gi_affinity) + return -EINVAL; + acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common); + + if (!(gi_affinity->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GENERIC_AFFINITY_ENABLED)) + return -EINVAL; + + node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(gi_affinity->proximity_domain); + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) { + pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains.\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); + node_set_state(node, N_GENERIC_INITIATOR); + + return 0; +} +#else +static int __init +acpi_parse_gi_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, + const unsigned long end) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined (CONFIG_ARM64) */ + static int __initdata parsed_numa_memblks; static int __init @@ -385,7 +450,7 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void) /* SRAT: System Resource Affinity Table */ if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) { - struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[3]; + struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[4]; memset(srat_proc, 0, sizeof(srat_proc)); srat_proc[0].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY; @@ -394,6 +459,8 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void) srat_proc[1].handler = acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity; srat_proc[2].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY; srat_proc[2].handler = acpi_parse_gicc_affinity; + srat_proc[3].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_AFFINITY; + srat_proc[3].handler = acpi_parse_gi_affinity; acpi_table_parse_entries_array(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat), diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c index 508b80f6329b..53383f1f683c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/node.c +++ b/drivers/base/node.c @@ -980,6 +980,8 @@ static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = { #endif [N_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_memory, N_MEMORY), [N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU), + [N_GENERIC_INITIATOR] = _NODE_ATTR(has_generic_initiator, + N_GENERIC_INITIATOR), }; static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = { @@ -991,6 +993,7 @@ static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = { #endif &node_state_attr[N_MEMORY].attr.attr, &node_state_attr[N_CPU].attr.attr, + &node_state_attr[N_GENERIC_INITIATOR].attr.attr, NULL }; diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h index 27e7fa36f707..3334ce056335 100644 --- a/include/linux/nodemask.h +++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ enum node_states { #endif N_MEMORY, /* The node has memory(regular, high, movable) */ N_CPU, /* The node has one or more cpus */ + N_GENERIC_INITIATOR, /* The node has one or more Generic Initiators */ NR_NODE_STATES }; From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:07 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724333 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB9E739 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1D820866 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C1D820866 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 314938D0041; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:45 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2EC048D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2034B8D0041; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0224.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.224]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABAA8D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:53:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BB9824805A for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167612368.30.hall52_2c1312e27028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA9C180B3C8E for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30054:30090,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.15.100 64.95.201.95;04yrybr9g4tjxcbom1ucra4gatkoayc84xg8hdnbsh1wz9t8wd3yyd7tgn8ps6y.goq8ktkcq1ngis9crpp87edufartcsdifpj55drma179izrzmri4cxzm5rrz9re.4-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:23,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: hall52_2c1312e27028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4071 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6A017F2C2594C9A58F9A; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:53:40 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:53:40 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 2/6] x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:07 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9EA9C180B3C8E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: In common with memoryless domains we only register GI domains if the proximity node is not online. If a domain is already a memory containing domain, or a memoryless domain there is nothing to do just because it also contains a Generic Initiator. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 + arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h index bbfde3d2662f..f631467272a3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h @@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ extern void numa_clear_node(int cpu); extern void __init init_cpu_to_node(void); extern void numa_add_cpu(int cpu); extern void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu); +extern void init_gi_nodes(void); #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */ static inline void numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) { } static inline void numa_clear_node(int cpu) { } static inline void init_cpu_to_node(void) { } static inline void numa_add_cpu(int cpu) { } static inline void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu) { } +static inline void init_gi_nodes(void) { } #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index 3511736fbc74..9062c146f03a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -1218,6 +1218,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) prefill_possible_map(); init_cpu_to_node(); + init_gi_nodes(); io_apic_init_mappings(); diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index aa76ec2d359b..fc630dc6764e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -747,6 +747,20 @@ static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid) */ } +/* + * Generic Initiator Nodes may have neither CPU nor Memory. + * At this stage if either of the others were present we would + * already be online. + */ +void __init init_gi_nodes(void) +{ + int nid; + + for_each_node_state(nid, N_GENERIC_INITIATOR) + if (!node_online(nid)) + init_memory_less_node(nid); +} + /* * Setup early cpu_to_node. * From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:08 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724337 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F98E14F6 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5BE20866 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0F5BE20866 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 474BB8D0047; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:16 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 424298D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3609B8D0047; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0121.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.121]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8568D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90CB181AC9BF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167613670.03.shock50_0d0b88e27028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF128A4EB for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30054,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-64.95.201.95 62.18.15.100;04y8sbc3wsh5g9g83q17ahwnkk76ayci5ksq9y3cxwwzqrg7q99px79un16bbgd.fe13qzaim8hfo5pd7wfk53dmqqnwj1rxdkkezmpfaqkpjmjii8rqmyhy8hx7np9.w-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:31,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: shock50_0d0b88e27028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3457 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EE949EF2673380C58CC7; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:54:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:54:10 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 3/6] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 87CF128A4EB X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Until we tell ACPI that we support generic initiators, it will have to operate in fall back domain mode and all _PXM entries should be on existing non GI domains. This patch sets the relevant OSC bit to make that happen. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index 54002670cb7a..113c661eb848 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -303,7 +303,11 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT; capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT; +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT; +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_X86 + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT; if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP)) { capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT; capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 1e4cdc6c7ae2..1321518a53d2 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context); #define OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000080 #define OSC_SB_OSLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000100 #define OSC_SB_CPC_DIVERSE_HIGH_SUPPORT 0x00001000 +#define OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT 0x00002000 extern bool osc_sb_apei_support_acked; extern bool osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed; From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724345 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A272B739 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693EF20888 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 693EF20888 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A17E58D0048; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:43 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9C8978D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 905478D0048; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0103.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.103]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4E98D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D9C8248D52 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167614846.14.bat02_5b0c02c27028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0779F18229818 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30012:30054,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.15.100 64.95.201.95;04yr3ftm5rsdsu3ojid9fptbrqiihypjiz6bdsyupb9zxupcdz6zjdc7x8sh5f6.o79y4ai7dhf4z5zxgxdxp3gkcqmdkjsrqhkta8nigk8r1zs4b45oeoc91wyuiqo.y-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:24,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: bat02_5b0c02c27028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3124 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 032C127994B91CF0FFE4; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:54:41 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:54:40 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0779F18229818 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: In ACPI 6.3, the Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure changed substantially. One of those changes was that the flag for "Memory Proximity Domain field is valid" was deprecated. This was because the field "Proximity Domain for the Memory" became a required field and hence having a validity flag makes no sense. So the correct logic is to always assume the field is there. Current code assumes it never is. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c index 2c32cfb72370..07cfe50136e0 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%u Memory Domain:%u\n", p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD); - if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) { + if ((p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) || hmat_revision == 2) { target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD); if (!target) { pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n"); From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:10 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724351 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9398514F6 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CE0208DB for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 54CE0208DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7F6788D0049; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:13 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7A76B8D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6BCC98D0049; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0084.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.84]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559668D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207921E16 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167616106.09.oven48_2c0538627028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BDC180AD811 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30054:30064:30070:30090,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.15.100 64.95.201.95;04yrpz9pwtp1podrik4p97k5r9z7popa7tt8np1ksyckt31cn7hsuopk5myo4mn.e3mua3bzkyoctfytybthgfw7bpobtp99f6ywu8af9b3h8xxw3wwthe69ksibsa1.6-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:24,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: oven48_2c0538627028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9397 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf34.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 493DB539CCBCBF309382; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:55:11 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:55:11 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 5/6] node: Add access1 class to represent CPU to memory characteristics Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 03BDC180AD811 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: New access1 class is nearly the same as access0, but always provides characteristics for CPUs to memory. The existing access0 class provides characteristics to nearest or direct connnect initiator which may be a Generic Initiator such as a GPU or network adapter. This new class allows thread placement on CPUs to be performed so as to give optimal access characteristics to memory, even if that memory is for example attached to a GPU or similar and only accessible to the CPU via an appropriate bus. Suggested-by: Dan Willaims Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c index 07cfe50136e0..00b4cdbefb5e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct memory_target { unsigned int memory_pxm; unsigned int processor_pxm; struct resource memregions; - struct node_hmem_attrs hmem_attrs; + struct node_hmem_attrs hmem_attrs[2]; struct list_head caches; struct node_cache_attrs cache_attrs; bool registered; @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct memory_target { struct memory_initiator { struct list_head node; unsigned int processor_pxm; + bool has_cpu; }; struct memory_locality { @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ static __init void alloc_memory_initiator(unsigned int cpu_pxm) return; initiator->processor_pxm = cpu_pxm; + initiator->has_cpu = node_state(pxm_to_node(cpu_pxm), N_CPU); list_add_tail(&initiator->node, &initiators); } @@ -215,28 +217,28 @@ static u32 hmat_normalize(u16 entry, u64 base, u8 type) } static void hmat_update_target_access(struct memory_target *target, - u8 type, u32 value) + u8 type, u32 value, int access) { switch (type) { case ACPI_HMAT_ACCESS_LATENCY: - target->hmem_attrs.read_latency = value; - target->hmem_attrs.write_latency = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].read_latency = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].write_latency = value; break; case ACPI_HMAT_READ_LATENCY: - target->hmem_attrs.read_latency = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].read_latency = value; break; case ACPI_HMAT_WRITE_LATENCY: - target->hmem_attrs.write_latency = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].write_latency = value; break; case ACPI_HMAT_ACCESS_BANDWIDTH: - target->hmem_attrs.read_bandwidth = value; - target->hmem_attrs.write_bandwidth = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].read_bandwidth = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].write_bandwidth = value; break; case ACPI_HMAT_READ_BANDWIDTH: - target->hmem_attrs.read_bandwidth = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].read_bandwidth = value; break; case ACPI_HMAT_WRITE_BANDWIDTH: - target->hmem_attrs.write_bandwidth = value; + target->hmem_attrs[access].write_bandwidth = value; break; default: break; @@ -329,8 +331,12 @@ static __init int hmat_parse_locality(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, if (mem_hier == ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY) { target = find_mem_target(targs[targ]); - if (target && target->processor_pxm == inits[init]) - hmat_update_target_access(target, type, value); + if (target && target->processor_pxm == inits[init]) { + hmat_update_target_access(target, type, value, 0); + /* If the node has a CPU, update access 1*/ + if (node_state(pxm_to_node(inits[init]), N_CPU)) + hmat_update_target_access(target, type, value, 1); + } } } } @@ -566,6 +572,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target) unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid; struct memory_locality *loc = NULL; u32 best = 0; + bool access0done = false; int i; mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm); @@ -577,7 +584,11 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target) if (target->processor_pxm != PXM_INVAL) { cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(target->processor_pxm); register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0); - return; + access0done = true; + if (node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) { + register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1); + return; + } } if (list_empty(&localities)) @@ -591,6 +602,40 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target) */ bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES); list_sort(p_nodes, &initiators, initiator_cmp); + if (!access0done) { + for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) { + loc = localities_types[i]; + if (!loc) + continue; + + best = 0; + list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) { + u32 value; + + if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes)) + continue; + + value = hmat_initiator_perf(target, initiator, + loc->hmat_loc); + if (hmat_update_best(loc->hmat_loc->data_type, value, &best)) + bitmap_clear(p_nodes, 0, initiator->processor_pxm); + if (value != best) + clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes); + } + if (best) + hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 0); + } + + for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) { + cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i); + register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0); + } + } + + /* Access 1 ignores Generic Initiators */ + bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES); + list_sort(p_nodes, &initiators, initiator_cmp); + best = 0; for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) { loc = localities_types[i]; if (!loc) @@ -600,6 +645,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target) list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) { u32 value; + if (!initiator->has_cpu) { + clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes); + continue; + } if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes)) continue; @@ -610,12 +659,11 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target) clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes); } if (best) - hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best); + hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 1); } - for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) { cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i); - register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0); + register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1); } } @@ -628,10 +676,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target) node_add_cache(mem_nid, &tcache->cache_attrs); } -static void hmat_register_target_perf(struct memory_target *target) +static void hmat_register_target_perf(struct memory_target *target, int access) { unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm); - node_set_perf_attrs(mem_nid, &target->hmem_attrs, 0); + node_set_perf_attrs(mem_nid, &target->hmem_attrs[access], access); } static void hmat_register_target_device(struct memory_target *target, @@ -733,7 +781,8 @@ static void hmat_register_target(struct memory_target *target) if (!target->registered) { hmat_register_target_initiators(target); hmat_register_target_cache(target); - hmat_register_target_perf(target); + hmat_register_target_perf(target, 0); + hmat_register_target_perf(target, 1); target->registered = true; } mutex_unlock(&target_lock); From patchwork Wed Aug 19 14:51:11 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11724357 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EBC618 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1721F20888 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1721F20888 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 511098D004A; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4BFD38D0013; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3FF2B8D004A; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0042.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDED8D0013 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BA9181AC9BF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77167617450.17.mom02_2515e9627028 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8E6180D01B8 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30054:30070,0,RBL:185.176.76.210:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.15.100 64.95.201.95;04y8jugon7qc5df56snuw4ywjnoqkoc371jzh7z1wkqqd4s69z3q75yr4j56ii3.jkiis48d7kbr1o44qn8rqk3qxubzgbkw4ggn6x19gmgs91951oner4d46g8zh9t.k-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:25,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: mom02_2515e9627028 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3264 Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BE0AA37D166D367E32FE; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:55:41 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:55:41 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , , , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , , Dan Williams , Brice Goglin , Sean V Kelley , , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH v9 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1. Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:11 +0800 Message-ID: <20200819145111.1715026-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200819145111.1715026-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.191) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1F8E6180D01B8 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that are not CPUs). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst index 4d69ef1de830..b89bb85eac75 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ nodes' access characteristics share the same performance relative to other linked initiator nodes. Each target within an initiator's access class, though, do not necessarily perform the same as each other. +The access class "1" is used to allow differentiation between initiators +that are CPUs and hence suitable for generic task scheduling, and +IO initiators such as GPUs and NICs. Unlike access class 0, only +nodes containing CPUs are considered. + ================ NUMA Performance ================ @@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds. The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth for the platform. +Access class 1, takes the same form, but only includes values for CPU to +memory activity. + ========== NUMA Cache ==========